Women want to be treated equally.....

[WinterBorn]

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

Dear, you can try and explain any way you want.

 

[WinterBorn]

No idea. But then, if they engaged in porn, where ever they were would become the porn sector, now wouldn't it?

Your fixation with porn and demeaning sex speaks volumes about you.

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

 

[danielpalos]

you nonsense is more nonsensical.

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

 

[danielpalos]

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

Dear, you can try and explain any way you want.

thank you; i have, and you have nothing but fallacy for rebuttal.

 

[danielpalos]

dear; women only make considerably more, in the porn sector; simply withholding sex is a form of manipulation.

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

free is the opposite of price, in this discussion, dear.

 

[WinterBorn]

I am not the one requiring submission for sex as a requisite for equality, and then claiming it is all about honesty.

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

 

[WinterBorn]

Withholding sex is a form of manipulation that is not part of the business sector, whether porn or non-porn.

In other words, withholding sex is more about your social life than about this topic.

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

free is the opposite of price, in this discussion, dear.

Just because it does not have a price in currency does not mean it is free. The fact that you see women as a commodity to be purchased explains much.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, dear; it is about the honesty of flapping one's gums for Goodness instead of Badness.

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

 

[danielpalos]

maybe, but i also don't have much capital right now either, under our form of Capitalism. And, socialism requires social morals for free.

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

free is the opposite of price, in this discussion, dear.

Just because it does not have a price in currency does not mean it is free. The fact that you see women as a commodity to be purchased explains much.

yes, Good capitalists expect fees for services, and even may establish generous petty cash funds for such purposes.

 

[WinterBorn]

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Your "test". Lmao!

Dear little Daniel, your supposed "test" was your statement about requiring submission before they get equality? Lol

Nice try at backing away from what you said. But no one is believing that bullshit

 

[WinterBorn]

It does not require cash. It can also be a transaction based on mutual desire. But you seem unconcerned about the woman's desires. Only your own.

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

free is the opposite of price, in this discussion, dear.

Just because it does not have a price in currency does not mean it is free. The fact that you see women as a commodity to be purchased explains much.

yes, Good capitalists expect fees for services, and even may establish generous petty cash funds for such purposes.

Not every social interaction involves a cash fee. That you think it does is laughable.

 

[WinterBorn]

No dear, your position has been about your fantasies, not equality.

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Also, if there is hypocrisy here it is from you. You used the word "equality" and then made it unequal.

 

[danielpalos]

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Your "test". Lmao!

Dear little Daniel, your supposed "test" was your statement about requiring submission before they get equality? Lol

Nice try at backing away from what you said. But no one is believing that bullshit

not at all, dear; it was about the concept; i don't need to leave the non-porn sector to prove my worth.

 

[danielpalos]

dear; the Proof is, socialism requires social morals for free, like bearing True witness instead of False witness for poon. only shills do that.

I never said "free". But the exchange does not need to involve currency. It can be about desires and pleasures. But if the woman does not desire you, requiring her submission as the price of equality is depraved and manipulative.

free is the opposite of price, in this discussion, dear.

Just because it does not have a price in currency does not mean it is free. The fact that you see women as a commodity to be purchased explains much.

yes, Good capitalists expect fees for services, and even may establish generous petty cash funds for such purposes.

Not every social interaction involves a cash fee. That you think it does is laughable.

what in even more incredible, literally; is how the right ignores capitalism when claiming to believe in socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

no dear, that is your diversion due to a lack of a clue and a Cause.

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Also, if there is hypocrisy here it is from you. You used the word "equality" and then made it unequal.

not at all; everyone can flap their gums for Goodness instead of Badness, whenever they want.

 

[WinterBorn]

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Your "test". Lmao!

Dear little Daniel, your supposed "test" was your statement about requiring submission before they get equality? Lol

Nice try at backing away from what you said. But no one is believing that bullshit

not at all, dear; it was about the concept; i don't need to leave the non-porn sector to prove my worth.

It was about requiring women to submit to being used in order to prove they are serious about equality. That is depraved and manipulative.

 

[WinterBorn]

No dear. I have already explained it. You are limiting equality to only those women who will fuck a man. That is not equality, that is your fantasy.

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Also, if there is hypocrisy here it is from you. You used the word "equality" and then made it unequal.

not at all; everyone can flap their gums for Goodness instead of Badness, whenever they want.

And yet, you flap your gums for fantasies of manipulation and claim it is about honesty. It is not. It is about your inability to gain the attentions of the opposite sex. That is the sum total of your discussion thus far.

 

[danielpalos]

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Your "test". Lmao!

Dear little Daniel, your supposed "test" was your statement about requiring submission before they get equality? Lol

Nice try at backing away from what you said. But no one is believing that bullshit

not at all, dear; it was about the concept; i don't need to leave the non-porn sector to prove my worth.

It was about requiring women to submit to being used in order to prove they are serious about equality. That is depraved and manipulative.

dear, it is about honesty. why insist on your red herring?

 

[danielpalos]

yes dear, it is about that form of honesty through action--that is the concept regardless of your judgementalism. it is a good thing my first name is daniel.

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Also, if there is hypocrisy here it is from you. You used the word "equality" and then made it unequal.

not at all; everyone can flap their gums for Goodness instead of Badness, whenever they want.

And yet, you flap your gums for fantasies of manipulation and claim it is about honesty. It is not. It is about your inability to gain the attentions of the opposite sex. That is the sum total of your discussion thus far.

no dear, ad hominems are fallacies. nothing but, mr.diversion.

 

[WinterBorn]

How can you call it "equality" when you exclude so many?

dear, Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy, fail my little test, the first time. stop being such a shill.

Your "test". Lmao!

Dear little Daniel, your supposed "test" was your statement about requiring submission before they get equality? Lol

Nice try at backing away from what you said. But no one is believing that bullshit

not at all, dear; it was about the concept; i don't need to leave the non-porn sector to prove my worth.

It was about requiring women to submit to being used in order to prove they are serious about equality. That is depraved and manipulative.

dear, it is about honesty. why insist on your red herring?

No, it is not about honesty. It is about depraved manipulation for your own selfish desires.

If it were about honesty, it would not exclude every woman who would not submit.