Would a Progressive Society be a Free Society?

Society described in OP is

  • Free

    Votes: 6 20.0%
  • Authoritarian

    Votes: 7 23.3%
  • Totalitarian

    Votes: 17 56.7%

  • Total voters
    30
But that is true, you can NOT allow social media, that leverages the vast power of the PUBLIC Internet, to run their sites in biased, discriminatory, unequal, or abusive ways.
Yes, you can.
 
Some people are. Some people think it should be illegal to discriminate against someone because of their politics. Some people want government to regulate the social media companies - ostensibly to prevent them from discriminating. Which is kind of hilarious when you think about it: The solution to the government bullying social media is to give the government more power over social media. ???

No, the problem is not "the government bullying social media".
The problem is the government owns and is supposed to regulate social media, the Internet, but it instead does absolutely NOTHING!

The FCC has regulations that companies like Twitter agreed to, but the FCC has almost NEVER enforced any of the laws against internet discrimination, abuse, illegal censorship, etc.
 
Yes, you can.

No, the Internet is a public facility, so then has to allow all religions, age groups, political persuasion, races, etc., equal access.
The only censorship that can legally be allowed on the internet is when it is deliberately harming the rights of others with slander, libel, or inciting violence.
Twitter does not own anything, and has to abide entirely by the FCC regulations that explicitly prohibit political discrimination.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: cnm
No, the problem is not "the government bullying social media".
Yeah, it really is.
The problem is the government owns and is supposed to regulate social media, the Internet, but it instead does absolutely NOTHING!
OMG!!! "Regulators, mount up!"
The FCC has regulations that companies like Twitter agreed to, but the FCC has almost NEVER enforced any of the laws against internet discrimination, abuse, illegal censorship, etc.
See Ray - this is what I'm talking about.
 
The FBI did not "basically" tell social media to remove dissenting opinions and posts. Is that what your media is telling you?

You have a good point about college speakers, but that issue died years ago and was always a very minor issue.
Right. They didn't "basically" do it because they literally did exactly that.

The issue of college speakers hasn't died. It still happens.
 
Except the FBI didn’t and the emails prove that.

The right wing media is exaggerating and fabricating. The story isn’t scandalous unless you add fake news to it.

They didn't use the exact words but it's what they meant. The lying MSM has used the term Russian Disinformation as code word for the laptop, and that's the code word the FBI used.
 
They didn't use the exact words but it's what they meant. The lying MSM has used the term Russian Disinformation as code word for the laptop, and that's the code word the FBI used.
A big problem is that a lot of the right don’t believe in Russian disinformation in the first place so you see this all as a conspiracy.

Getting conservatives to ignore the presence of Russian disinformation pays dividends to this day.
 
The FBI did tell them. Try viewing some actual news rather than prog propaganda.
Taibbi said they didn’t. Try reading the actual source and not conservative propaganda telling you what the source said.
 
A big problem is that a lot of the right don’t believe in Russian disinformation in the first place so you see this all as a conspiracy.

Getting conservatives to ignore the presence of Russian disinformation pays dividends to this day.
Hunter's laptop was not Russian disinformation, moron. The FBI has admitted it.
 
Hunter's laptop was not Russian disinformation, moron. The FBI has admitted it.
Okay. Good thing the FBI never said it was.

The FBI is going to continue working with social media to combat foreign disinformation, especially Russian disinformation.
 
A big problem is that a lot of the right don’t believe in Russian disinformation in the first place so you see this all as a conspiracy.

Getting conservatives to ignore the presence of Russian disinformation pays dividends to this day.

The only person that used Russian disinformation and attempted election interference was Hillary Clinton. She laundered money through her lawyers that got to Russia for fake news about Trump via Steele.
 
The only person that used Russian disinformation and attempted election interference was Hillary Clinton. She laundered money through her lawyers that got to Russia for fake news about Trump via Steele.
Nothing about this is true. You should read the Mueller report. The Russians engaged in many active measures in the 2016 and 2020 campaign.

Specifically in 2020, we knew that Russia was pushing disinformation about Hunter Biden.

I guess someone like yourself who doesn’t believe the facts or Russian involvement in our elections can’t understand why the FBI would be in communication with social media companies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top