Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong again. My rights are inherit. YOU DON'T OWN ME. This tyrannical majority, led by authoritarians like you, is restricting our inherit rights.I never said it was. Yes you did Rights are for everyone------equally. Except gays right? No special rights for any minority or majority. Except heteros, right? Lots of special rights exclusive to heteros correct?
But you also are missing the point--------------the majority does rule at the polling place, in congress, and in local state and city legislatures. 51% or more voting one way decides what laws all of us will live by. This is a new thing you understand that correct? The Constitution used to bind our laws such that a simple majority could not take our liberties way you got that right?
A majority ratified the constitution, a majority approved the signing of the declaration of independence, a majority found OJ innocent. Most murder trials require a unanimous vote, not a simple majority. There is a marked difference between unanimous, super majority requirements, and simple majority requirements.
Majority rules------------why is that so hard for you to grasp?
In blue. Tyranny of the Majority is not what liberty is about, nimrod.
you are mixing two different things. rights and voting majorities. Rights are for everyone regardless of their minority or majority status. Rights are conferred on citizens by a majority vote of the citizens.
Romney didn't have any good ideas. That was his fatal flaw.
Thats what the media told you and you are sticking with it---------------------------------
I don't see you listing any good ideas Romney had.
Romney is a great man who has led an admirable life filled with accomplishments. We'd be lucky to get him! He's exactly the opposite of the dilettante in the White House now....
Just because his skin is white instead of black doesn't mean he and Obama are "exactly the opposite", racist.
Romney didn't have any good ideas. That was his fatal flaw.
Thats what the media told you and you are sticking with it---------------------------------
I don't see you listing any good ideas Romney had.
lower the corporate tax rate
peace through strength
equality in all things
fiscal dicipline
sound financial management
repeal obamacare
sane foreign policy
create jobs by growing the economy
Ok, there are 7. What were obama's good ideas?
Thx for correcting my spelling error.Wrong again. My rights are inherit. YOU DON'T OWN ME. This tyrannical majority, led by authoritarians like you, is restricting our inherit rights.I never said it was. Yes you did Rights are for everyone------equally. Except gays right? No special rights for any minority or majority. Except heteros, right? Lots of special rights exclusive to heteros correct?
But you also are missing the point--------------the majority does rule at the polling place, in congress, and in local state and city legislatures. 51% or more voting one way decides what laws all of us will live by. This is a new thing you understand that correct? The Constitution used to bind our laws such that a simple majority could not take our liberties way you got that right?
A majority ratified the constitution, a majority approved the signing of the declaration of independence, a majority found OJ innocent. Most murder trials require a unanimous vote, not a simple majority. There is a marked difference between unanimous, super majority requirements, and simple majority requirements.
Majority rules------------why is that so hard for you to grasp?
In blue. Tyranny of the Majority is not what liberty is about, nimrod.
you are mixing two different things. rights and voting majorities. Rights are for everyone regardless of their minority or majority status. Rights are conferred on citizens by a majority vote of the citizens.
I think you mean 'inherent'. Our founding documents defined the inherent rights of citizens of this country. Those founding documents were executed after a majority voted for them. Those documents "define" what the founders believed to be "inherent" rights.
This is not complicated, you are either dense or just trying to argue for the sake of argument.
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
I pray everyday for Mitt to run
into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Wish we still had negs.lol.... delish.
"Severely Conservative" Mitt Romney is obviously not Conservative enough for a number of you frothers out there.
Delightful.
lol.... delish.
"Severely Conservative" Mitt Romney is obviously not Conservative enough for a number of you frothers out there.
Delightful.
Thx for correcting my spelling error.Wrong again. My rights are inherit. YOU DON'T OWN ME. This tyrannical majority, led by authoritarians like you, is restricting our inherit rights.I never said it was. Yes you did Rights are for everyone------equally. Except gays right? No special rights for any minority or majority. Except heteros, right? Lots of special rights exclusive to heteros correct?
But you also are missing the point--------------the majority does rule at the polling place, in congress, and in local state and city legislatures. 51% or more voting one way decides what laws all of us will live by. This is a new thing you understand that correct? The Constitution used to bind our laws such that a simple majority could not take our liberties way you got that right?
A majority ratified the constitution, a majority approved the signing of the declaration of independence, a majority found OJ innocent. Most murder trials require a unanimous vote, not a simple majority. There is a marked difference between unanimous, super majority requirements, and simple majority requirements.
Majority rules------------why is that so hard for you to grasp?
In blue. Tyranny of the Majority is not what liberty is about, nimrod.
you are mixing two different things. rights and voting majorities. Rights are for everyone regardless of their minority or majority status. Rights are conferred on citizens by a majority vote of the citizens.
I think you mean 'inherent'. Our founding documents defined the inherent rights of citizens of this country. Those founding documents were executed after a majority voted for them. Those documents "define" what the founders believed to be "inherent" rights.
This is not complicated, you are either dense or just trying to argue for the sake of argument.
You are 100% wrong about the founders defining our inherent rights. But I'm not surprised. Most people don't understand the Constitution.
What the founders did is provide a certain list of explicit restrictions on federal government then waved their hands in a wide arc restricting our federal government from everything else not already listed.
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
I pray everyday for Mitt to run
into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Romney is another W...a moderate progressive who is even more likely than W to do the bidding of the MSM and D Party...so do not be surprised if the MSM and D Party are covertly pushing for Mitt to run again...along with the sizeable progressive/statist wing of the R Party
.
Hillary or Mitt...a win-win for Progressives...and a complete disaster for America.
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
I pray everyday for Mitt to run
into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Romney is another W...a moderate progressive who is even more likely than W to do the bidding of the MSM and D Party...so do not be surprised if the MSM and D Party are covertly pushing for Mitt to run again...along with the sizeable progressive/statist wing of the R Party
.
Hillary or Mitt...a win-win for Progressives...and a complete disaster for America.
That kind of thinking will ensure that we have a president hillary---------is that what you really want?
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
I pray everyday for Mitt to run
into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Romney is another W...a moderate progressive who is even more likely than W to do the bidding of the MSM and D Party...so do not be surprised if the MSM and D Party are covertly pushing for Mitt to run again...along with the sizeable progressive/statist wing of the R Party
.
Hillary or Mitt...a win-win for Progressives...and a complete disaster for America.
That kind of thinking will ensure that we have a president hillary---------is that what you really want?
I want people to stop compromising their principles.
Looks like neither one of us are going to get what they want, champ.
Base pay is unimportant, it's the perks that are sought after.Romney would be taking a pay cut to be president."No, proven loser."
Better reason though he's a uber wealthy who has nothing in common with the average American and is likely looking at the Presidency more as a way to accrue even more wealth doing favors for special interests.
I hate Romney and all, but I just don't get that vibe.
He doesn't need the presidency to accrue wealth. Look at his history, it's a fact. The man's King Midas, lol.
Romney was never in it for the money or perks. He has all the money he and his family will ever need.
Why is it so hard to believe someone would run for president because he wants to help the country?
Romney didn't have any good ideas. That was his fatal flaw.
Thats what the media told you and you are sticking with it---------------------------------
I don't see you listing any good ideas Romney had.
lower the corporate tax rate
peace through strength
equality in all things
fiscal dicipline
sound financial management
repeal obamacare
sane foreign policy
create jobs by growing the economy
Ok, there are 7. What were obama's good ideas?
No one draws 2016 speculation like Mitt.
I pray everyday for Mitt to run
into the path of an oncoming vehicle.
Romney is another W...a moderate progressive who is even more likely than W to do the bidding of the MSM and D Party...so do not be surprised if the MSM and D Party are covertly pushing for Mitt to run again...along with the sizeable progressive/statist wing of the R Party
.
Hillary or Mitt...a win-win for Progressives...and a complete disaster for America.
That kind of thinking will ensure that we have a president hillary---------is that what you really want?
I want people to stop compromising their principles.
Looks like neither one of us are going to get what they want, champ.
Life is a series of compromises. No one ever gets exactly what they want. Choosing the lesser of two evils is a smart compromise.--------- champ!
Romney didn't have any good ideas. That was his fatal flaw.
Thats what the media told you and you are sticking with it---------------------------------
I don't see you listing any good ideas Romney had.
lower the corporate tax rate
peace through strength
equality in all things
fiscal dicipline
sound financial management
repeal obamacare
sane foreign policy
create jobs by growing the economy
Ok, there are 7. What were obama's good ideas?
Fair and flat taxes
Get rid of corporate and individual welfare which distorts the incentive system
Reign in the regulatory "4th branch" of government so that it is not writing laws instead of Congress
Romney didn't have any good ideas. That was his fatal flaw.
Thats what the media told you and you are sticking with it---------------------------------
I don't see you listing any good ideas Romney had.
lower the corporate tax rate
peace through strength
equality in all things
fiscal dicipline
sound financial management
repeal obamacare
sane foreign policy
create jobs by growing the economy
Ok, there are 7. What were obama's good ideas?
Fair and flat taxes
Get rid of corporate and individual welfare which distorts the incentive system
Reign in the regulatory "4th branch" of government so that it is not writing laws instead of Congress
you aren't claiming that obozo did those things are you?
