Wouldnt it be funny if Trump gave us single payer?

What if that is what he will replace it with?
We already know he liked that idea
---
There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”
60 min interview last year
“If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over... I believe in universal healthcare.”
Said that a few years ago
"I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses...
"We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan, as many individual states are doing."

"The America We Deserve"
---
Would single payer be OK then?
Millions would quit everything and live off the nanny state... just like Europe. Fact
Europe is doing better than America in Every way.

You do know all of those quantative easings that went on at the FED over the past eigh years were funneled through the IMF into the ECB, right?

With out the US central bank and government, the Eurozone would have fallen apart, and the common market would have experienced a meltdown much like the US did.

This is why the Congress would not pass Rand Paul, Bernie Sander's, and Ron Paul's audit. Hell, when it came right down to it, Sander's even REVERSED position when the vote came up, and voted against it.


It's all a scam, the FED is propping the whole western empire up. It's a house of cards waiting to collapse.
 
I would repeal it and those without insurance have the option for Medicaid. Charge a monthly premium based on income. If you don't want insurance you are not forced to buy it period. Trump has no choice because thanks to Obama you cant pull coverage without voters kicking your ass out off office...why this wasn't done to begin with I have no clue. Obama screwed everything up.


I would not have a problem of healthcare for everyone so long as we have a flat tax for everyone but this old shit of half the country getting a free ride is getting old. And, drop the free phone and other superfluous bs the taxpayer is on the hook for. We are breeding non performers!

They get rich off of us they can pay more. Look at trump doesn't pay anything, most of them don't.
They pay what the law says they have to pay, all except Al Sharpton.
 
I would repeal it and those without insurance have the option for Medicaid. Charge a monthly premium based on income. If you don't want insurance you are not forced to buy it period. Trump has no choice because thanks to Obama you cant pull coverage without voters kicking your ass out off office...why this wasn't done to begin with I have no clue. Obama screwed everything up.
Oblama followed the republican plan almost to the letter.....

Silly Obama didn't realize they were trolling him.

Mitt-Romney-Troll-Face.png
 
What if that is what he will replace it with?
We already know he liked that idea
---
There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”
60 min interview last year
“If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over... I believe in universal healthcare.”
Said that a few years ago
"I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses...
"We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan, as many individual states are doing."

"The America We Deserve"
---
Would single payer be OK then?
Millions would quit everything and live off the nanny state... just like Europe. Fact
Europe is doing better than America in Every way.

You do know all of those quantative easings that went on at the FED over the past eigh years were funneled through the IMF into the ECB, right?

With out the US central bank and government, the Eurozone would have fallen apart, and the common market would have experienced a meltdown much like the US did.

This is why the Congress would not pass Rand Paul, Bernie Sander's, and Ron Paul's audit. Hell, when it came right down to it, Sander's even REVERSED position when the vote came up, and voted against it.


It's all a scam, the FED is propping the whole western empire up. It's a house of cards waiting to collapse.
It's the opposite. If businesses fell in the West, then new ones would grow up instantly. All they did was keep the bubble inflated.
 
Considering he has no policies anything is possible. :dunno:

I don't see Rump pushing for anything on any front unless it's kicking back something personally to Numero Uno. That's all he's ever been about all his life and there's zero reason to think that would suddenly change. So he might do Single Payer if there's a way to do it that funnels cash back to his mythological fortune, but other than that he's got no incentive.

You know I've always been suspicious of government, and I'm here to discuss and debate the merits, the legitimacy of the State.


For the past four years, when ever a poster referred to the POTUS as Oblammer, Obummer, Bammy, ObaMao, Obamadinejad, Oblowme, Odrama, Maobama, LOLbama, Bam-Bam, Bambi, Bammy, B.O., etc. I've always taken the opinion of a poster using such terms with a general grain of salt. I get that hatred and partisan vitriol informs their posts, not an informed analysis of issues.

Why? Because it is apparent to the board that the posting comes from a place of hate and vitriol, not from reasoned, critical thought. Do you want to be viewed by those in the center, and those non-members that come through, that just read our board, as someone whose posts can't be taken seriously?

If you continually use Ad hominem fallacy, the entirety of your posts won't be taken seriously by anyone with intellectual integrity. We know the sort of characters on the right that constantly disparage Obama. Like him or hate him, he is the POTUS, and he was elected by the laws of the land. The same is true for the current clown that leads the lemmings.

Using ad hominem in your arguments weakens them, and you tend to be a poster that doesn't need to resort to this. . .


Just an observation. Think about how you felt when ever bullet heads on the right would use these disparaging terms for Obama, and then how seriously you would proceed to consider their ideas.

You're taking "Rump" as ad hominem?

I use it as a title, one he's worked very hard to earn. And no I cannot ---as in not capable of --- take him seriously as a President given what I already know about him. That's all a given.

But the analysis is the same. I could replace the letter T on his name and the post would say exactly the same thing. And it would return to the same point of origin, that being a description of a completely self-absorbed asshole who's concerned about absolutely nothing but Himself --- whether that applies to policies on Single Payer or anything else, or whether it applies to "Rump".

Far as I'm concerned he'll earn his full name when he earns it. Until then he has nothing but contempt. Because that's exactly what he's earned.

And I might add, *NONE* of that is mitigated by being elected President --- had he lost the election he would still be "Rump".

Point taken about apparent objectivity and granted, it is a valid point. When and if I think I need that image I'll work it in (and in fact I already do when taking pains to be objective such as a poll). But for now bowdlerizing my own term would be tantamount to awarding a level of respect he simply does not by any definition deserve.

Calling someone by their given birth name is not a sign of respect, it only shows you are an adult rather than a petulant child.
 
What if that is what he will replace it with?
We already know he liked that idea
---
There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”
60 min interview last year
“If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over... I believe in universal healthcare.”
Said that a few years ago
"I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses...
"We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan, as many individual states are doing."

"The America We Deserve"
---
Would single payer be OK then?
Millions would quit everything and live off the nanny state... just like Europe. Fact
Europe is doing better than America in Every way.
:lmao:
 
What if that is what he will replace it with?
We already know he liked that idea
---
There’s many different ways, by the way. Everybody’s got to be covered. This is an un-Republican thing for me to say because a lot of times they say, “No, no, the lower 25 percent that can’t afford private. But–”
60 min interview last year
“If you can’t take care of your sick in the country, forget it, it’s all over... I believe in universal healthcare.”
Said that a few years ago
"I'm a conservative on most issues but a liberal on this one. We should not hear so many stories of families ruined by healthcare expenses...
"We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan, as many individual states are doing."

"The America We Deserve"
---
Would single payer be OK then?
Millions would quit everything and live off the nanny state... just like Europe. Fact
Europe is doing better than America in Every way.

You do know all of those quantative easings that went on at the FED over the past eigh years were funneled through the IMF into the ECB, right?

With out the US central bank and government, the Eurozone would have fallen apart, and the common market would have experienced a meltdown much like the US did.

This is why the Congress would not pass Rand Paul, Bernie Sander's, and Ron Paul's audit. Hell, when it came right down to it, Sander's even REVERSED position when the vote came up, and voted against it.


It's all a scam, the FED is propping the whole western empire up. It's a house of cards waiting to collapse.
It's the opposite. If businesses fell in the West, then new ones would grow up instantly. All they did was keep the bubble inflated.
Oh, I'm not disagreeing with you.

All I'm saying is that, when you claim that socialist policies of Europe enable them to excel in every way, that this is only because of the Keynesian bubble that has been created by the reserve currency.

Otherwise, all of Europe would first go the way of Cypress before it could go the way of Iceland.
 

Forum List

Back
Top