Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your thoughts?
Mathematical error.
For you and your liberal friends...
A strategic error.
Consider the charade you pulled with Kavanaugh. The same kind of character assassination you tried to pull on Trump. In both instances you failed. You lost. And you will pay dearly at the ballot box in a few weeks.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
I predicted some red State dems would vote for Kavanaugh with a confirmation vote of 56-44, now it looks like for the first time in history a supreme court justice will be confirmed with a positive vote of less than 50. 49-48 for confirmation, no one saw this one coming.
Your thoughts?
.
I predicted some red State dems would vote for Kavanaugh with a confirmation vote of 56-44, now it looks like for the first time in history a supreme court justice will be confirmed with a positive vote of less than 50. 49-48 for confirmation, no one saw this one coming.
Your thoughts?
.
Your thoughts?
Mathematical error.
For you and your liberal friends...
A strategic error.
Consider the charade you pulled with Kavanaugh. The same kind of character assassination you tried to pull on Trump. In both instances you failed. You lost. And you will pay dearly at the ballot box in a few weeks.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tell the class how you gave OJ the benefit of the doubt & thought him innocent b4 he stood trial.
oh & you might wanna throw in the 'well OJ was 'proven' innocent so accept it ' line of crap, like you are trying to peddle here on this very thread.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I predicted some red State dems would vote for Kavanaugh with a confirmation vote of 56-44, now it looks like for the first time in history a supreme court justice will be confirmed with a positive vote of less than 50. 49-48 for confirmation, no one saw this one coming.
Your thoughts?
that Democrats didn't want to put a drunk rapist on the Court... but the Republicans would put Jack the fucking Ripper on SCOTUS if it helps rich people.
Mike Drop.
Mathematical error.
For you and your liberal friends...
A strategic error.
Consider the charade you pulled with Kavanaugh. The same kind of character assassination you tried to pull on Trump. In both instances you failed. You lost. And you will pay dearly at the ballot box in a few weeks.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tell the class how you gave OJ the benefit of the doubt & thought him innocent b4 he stood trial.
oh & you might wanna throw in the 'well OJ was 'proven' innocent so accept it ' line of crap, like you are trying to peddle here on this very thread.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I still think he was innocent, because the glove was too small. Even if he was guilty, the gold-digging bitch deserved it.
On twitter, some are already asking when someone will "take one for the team" by offing Kavanaugh.
Marital rape isn't a thing.This is war. Democrats who stray from the party line would be dealt with.
You and your bullshit analogies. All of the hand wringing by powerful white men who fear reprisals from women they've molested "I fear more for my sons than my daughters". What a bullshit line.
Statistics tell us that 1/3 women will suffer serious sexual assault or rape in her lifetime. That means their daughters have a 33% chance of being sexually assaulted. But their sons only have a .003% change of being falsely accused of sexual assault or rape. Of course Republlicans are never shy about needless fear mongering, but maybe the problem is that these men have been less than gentlemanly in their interactions with women and they think, holy cow that could be me! Rather the more likely scenario.
As a group, no group of white male is more entitled than rich prep school boys, especially when it comes to girls. Trump is one of those boys, and it's not surprising that Trump has surrounded himself with these types of people, or that so many of the men in the Trump orbit have very dodgy histories with women.
Over and over Kavenaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan and a liar, either of which utterly disqualifies him to serve on the SC.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
For you and your liberal friends...
A strategic error.
Consider the charade you pulled with Kavanaugh. The same kind of character assassination you tried to pull on Trump. In both instances you failed. You lost. And you will pay dearly at the ballot box in a few weeks.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tell the class how you gave OJ the benefit of the doubt & thought him innocent b4 he stood trial.
oh & you might wanna throw in the 'well OJ was 'proven' innocent so accept it ' line of crap, like you are trying to peddle here on this very thread.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I still think he was innocent, because the glove was too small. Even if he was guilty, the gold-digging bitch deserved it.
you just made jesus cry
Marital rape isn't a thing.You and your bullshit analogies. All of the hand wringing by powerful white men who fear reprisals from women they've molested "I fear more for my sons than my daughters". What a bullshit line.
Statistics tell us that 1/3 women will suffer serious sexual assault or rape in her lifetime. That means their daughters have a 33% chance of being sexually assaulted. But their sons only have a .003% change of being falsely accused of sexual assault or rape. Of course Republlicans are never shy about needless fear mongering, but maybe the problem is that these men have been less than gentlemanly in their interactions with women and they think, holy cow that could be me! Rather the more likely scenario.
As a group, no group of white male is more entitled than rich prep school boys, especially when it comes to girls. Trump is one of those boys, and it's not surprising that Trump has surrounded himself with these types of people, or that so many of the men in the Trump orbit have very dodgy histories with women.
Over and over Kavenaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan and a liar, either of which utterly disqualifies him to serve on the SC.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
For wives or husbands.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tell the class how you gave OJ the benefit of the doubt & thought him innocent b4 he stood trial.
oh & you might wanna throw in the 'well OJ was 'proven' innocent so accept it ' line of crap, like you are trying to peddle here on this very thread.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I still think he was innocent, because the glove was too small. Even if he was guilty, the gold-digging bitch deserved it.
you just made jesus cry
Sorry, but it is what it is. Maybe the next gold-digger will think twice.
This is war. Democrats who stray from the party line would be dealt with.
You and your bullshit analogies. All of the hand wringing by powerful white men who fear reprisals from women they've molested "I fear more for my sons than my daughters". What a bullshit line.
Statistics tell us that 1/3 women will suffer serious sexual assault or rape in her lifetime. That means their daughters have a 33% chance of being sexually assaulted. But their sons only have a .003% change of being falsely accused of sexual assault or rape. Of course Republlicans are never shy about needless fear mongering, but maybe the problem is that these men have been less than gentlemanly in their interactions with women and they think, holy cow that could be me! Rather the more likely scenario.
As a group, no group of white male is more entitled than rich prep school boys, especially when it comes to girls. Trump is one of those boys, and it's not surprising that Trump has surrounded himself with these types of people, or that so many of the men in the Trump orbit have very dodgy histories with women.
Over and over Kavenaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan and a liar, either of which utterly disqualifies him to serve on the SC.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
You can't rape your spouse.Marital rape isn't a thing.Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
For wives or husbands.
that's why it's illegal now...
'cause it is a thing.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up you mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
No in any realistic numbers that would deter men from raping women. Statistics tell us that less than 30% of rapes are reported, and of those that are reported, fewer still are prosecuted. 994 out of 1000 rapists will walk free. Less than 1% of rapists end up in jail. And the process that women are put through when they do report a rape or sexual assault is often worse than the actual assault in the first place.
Saying things are fair and equal doesn't make them so. Just like saying that racial discrimination is illegal but we all know it happens. No where does it happen more than in the judicial system when no one wants to "ruin" the life of a bright young man with an allegation of rape. Like Brock Turner. And in Brock's case he was caught in the act of viciously raping an unconscious woman by two men who testified that what they saw made them throw up. And he was a fine young man whose life was ruin by a rape conviction and a six month sentence.
No woman reports the nice young man who raped her because she'll be treated like Dr. Ford is being treated in the media. Maybe not on a large scale but a small town can be just as cruel and drive you out. Especially if the boy comes from money and the girl doesn't. Women learn to shut up and wear a bathing suit under their clothes.
If you think requiring enough evidence to prove guilt is disrespecting anyone, well you're just a screw ball. And like I said, don't blame the rest of us for women who chose not to say any thing and enable bad men to continue in their ways. Ford is responsible for not having the facts and trusting a commiecrat to keep their word and recommend lawyers. BTW her lawyers should be disbarred and Ford should be fired for stupidity. It was on the news for days that the judiciary committee was willing to go to CA to speak to her privately, she swore under oath she wasn't aware of that offer. Give me a fricking break.
BTW there's no way you can prove the numbers you're spewing.
.
it wasn't a trial - it was a job interview little kitty. learn the difference. the tremendous amt of people speaking against his character & the multitude of attorneys speaking out against him & the freakin councel of churches! they even said the guy is unfit.
You and your bullshit analogies. All of the hand wringing by powerful white men who fear reprisals from women they've molested "I fear more for my sons than my daughters". What a bullshit line.
Statistics tell us that 1/3 women will suffer serious sexual assault or rape in her lifetime. That means their daughters have a 33% chance of being sexually assaulted. But their sons only have a .003% change of being falsely accused of sexual assault or rape. Of course Republlicans are never shy about needless fear mongering, but maybe the problem is that these men have been less than gentlemanly in their interactions with women and they think, holy cow that could be me! Rather the more likely scenario.
As a group, no group of white male is more entitled than rich prep school boys, especially when it comes to girls. Trump is one of those boys, and it's not surprising that Trump has surrounded himself with these types of people, or that so many of the men in the Trump orbit have very dodgy histories with women.
Over and over Kavenaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan and a liar, either of which utterly disqualifies him to serve on the SC.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
Well now that you bring it up, why would Ford go to an upstairs bedroom with two guys? Especially two guys she claims didn't live in the house and were drunk. Can't claim she was drunk, after all she's sure she only had one beer. That's just one more unanswered question in Ford's fairy tale.
.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up you mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
No in any realistic numbers that would deter men from raping women. Statistics tell us that less than 30% of rapes are reported, and of those that are reported, fewer still are prosecuted. 994 out of 1000 rapists will walk free. Less than 1% of rapists end up in jail. And the process that women are put through when they do report a rape or sexual assault is often worse than the actual assault in the first place.
Saying things are fair and equal doesn't make them so. Just like saying that racial discrimination is illegal but we all know it happens. No where does it happen more than in the judicial system when no one wants to "ruin" the life of a bright young man with an allegation of rape. Like Brock Turner. And in Brock's case he was caught in the act of viciously raping an unconscious woman by two men who testified that what they saw made them throw up. And he was a fine young man whose life was ruin by a rape conviction and a six month sentence.
No woman reports the nice young man who raped her because she'll be treated like Dr. Ford is being treated in the media. Maybe not on a large scale but a small town can be just as cruel and drive you out. Especially if the boy comes from money and the girl doesn't. Women learn to shut up and wear a bathing suit under their clothes.
If you think requiring enough evidence to prove guilt is disrespecting anyone, well you're just a screw ball. And like I said, don't blame the rest of us for women who chose not to say any thing and enable bad men to continue in their ways. Ford is responsible for not having the facts and trusting a commiecrat to keep their word and recommend lawyers. BTW her lawyers should be disbarred and Ford should be fired for stupidity. It was on the news for days that the judiciary committee was willing to go to CA to speak to her privately, she swore under oath she wasn't aware of that offer. Give me a fricking break.
BTW there's no way you can prove the numbers you're spewing.
.
it wasn't a trial - it was a job interview little kitty. learn the difference. the tremendous amt of people speaking against his character & the multitude of attorneys speaking out against him & the freakin councel of churches! they even said the guy is unfit.
Well you hit all the regressive talking points. A presumption of innocence is a bedrock of our society, not just the judicial system. Define tremendous amount, that don't include left wing whores.
.
You and your bullshit analogies. All of the hand wringing by powerful white men who fear reprisals from women they've molested "I fear more for my sons than my daughters". What a bullshit line.
Statistics tell us that 1/3 women will suffer serious sexual assault or rape in her lifetime. That means their daughters have a 33% chance of being sexually assaulted. But their sons only have a .003% change of being falsely accused of sexual assault or rape. Of course Republlicans are never shy about needless fear mongering, but maybe the problem is that these men have been less than gentlemanly in their interactions with women and they think, holy cow that could be me! Rather the more likely scenario.
As a group, no group of white male is more entitled than rich prep school boys, especially when it comes to girls. Trump is one of those boys, and it's not surprising that Trump has surrounded himself with these types of people, or that so many of the men in the Trump orbit have very dodgy histories with women.
Over and over Kavenaugh demonstrated that he is a partisan and a liar, either of which utterly disqualifies him to serve on the SC.
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
Well now that you bring it up, why would Ford go to an upstairs bedroom with two guys? Especially two guys she claims didn't live in the house and were drunk. Can't claim she was drunk, after all she's sure she only had one beer. That's just one more unanswered question in Ford's fairy tale.
.
Your thoughts?
Mathematical error.
For you and your liberal friends...
A strategic error.
Consider the charade you pulled with Kavanaugh. The same kind of character assassination you tried to pull on Trump. In both instances you failed. You lost. And you will pay dearly at the ballot box in a few weeks.
First of all, I'm not a liberal.
Second: Stealing defeat from the jaws of victory. How Democrats confirmed Kavvy.
I agree 100% that Democrats failed at every step of the way.
So you believe guilty until proven innocent? That doesn't make you a liberal, it makes you a commie.
.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tell the class how you gave OJ the benefit of the doubt & thought him innocent b4 he stood trial.
oh & you might wanna throw in the 'well OJ was 'proven' innocent so accept it ' line of crap, like you are trying to peddle here on this very thread.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Here's a thought, maybe women who remained silent should accept their responsibility as enablers. Prompt criminal prosecution is the answer, not sitting on allegations for years or decades when there's no way to prove what happened. Now women are blaming everyone else for their decisions. And before you start you're rant about me being insensitive, sensitivity has nothing to do with it, I'm just stating facts.
Now would you like to get back on topic.
getting the fucking 'good guys' with badges to believe you back then was not a top priority for them in many MANY cases.
More commie bullshit, men have been prosecuted for rape and assault forever. You folks keep telling me how women are equal to men, then you cry that you somehow can't get fair treatment for yourself. Make up your mind, are you some frail little thing that deserves protection or are you an equal?
.
uh-huh. more ignorant poorly educated bullshit.... it wasn't that long ago a woman could be questioned about her clothing, or where she was or who she was with(date rape) or even about her past boyfriends & if she 'slept' around when she took the stand; as if she deserved it .
1979 ---which really wasn't that long ago ---was the first time a woman was legally able to have her husband charged with marital rape.
Well now that you bring it up, why would Ford go to an upstairs bedroom with two guys? Especially two guys she claims didn't live in the house and were drunk. Can't claim she was drunk, after all she's sure she only had one beer. That's just one more unanswered question in Ford's fairy tale.
.
The more important question? Why would she name 4 people who weren't at this party as her witnesses? And her best Friend at that?
