Care4all
Warrior Princess
- Mar 24, 2007
- 73,644
- 28,646
Yes, you're busy, I can see that by how many posts you have posted on this thread....How does, fuck you and the horse you rode in on you bitch, sound to you? I'm busy.If the document included evidence of editing as you CLAIM, then PLEASE SHOW US THE EDITS you say it had.....what was retouched as you claim....SURELY if your claim is TRUE, you would be able to show the editing that occurred....what was changed....SHOW IT, or eat your words.Cause the document they provided includes evidence of the editing. It has been widely reported that the editing, at least by software, occurred. Being an expert on image files, I looked at the file and they correctly reported the fact that an odd tool was used in the steps of getting the image to us. A tool that is typically used to "EDIT" documents. Not a tool that is used to make an actual image of the document. Basically the document they gave us is at best a mess. I'd like to see an un-retouched high resolution image of the original document please. And I'd like to have a data forensics expert look at the original file and attest to the originality of said document.Because it has. The handlers used adobe to scan it then print it again during a couple steps in the handling of what we eventually saw, it's not a high res photo of what they originally received. The only reason I know of to use adobe for this is when you want to add stuff to it such as comments or adding additional text that you want to look like it was originally there.Your response didn't confuse me- your response didn't address the question- why do you think that photo has been edited?
'because it has'- and how do you know this? I mean other than waving your magic Birther wand over your monitor?
WHAT WAS EDITED?
busy? sure....