"Yes, Gay Marriage Hurts Me Personally"

[Faun]

And now, one man and another man, or one woman and another woman.

He said marriage, not mirage marriage

So did I.

Wooosh,right over your head

Oh, I got it.

Welcome to the 21st century. I hope it isn't too hard for you.

Also;

Hi Pubes!

Not hard at all for me, I see it as the mental illness it is.

Leave it to a rightie to classify the government securing the rights of Americans as, "mental illness."

 

[Faun]

Same sex marriage

Marriage, is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And now, one man and another man, or one woman and another woman.

Marriage IS: The Joining of One Man and One Woman.

In conserva-la-la land, maybe, but here in the United States of America -- marriage is the joining of two consenting adults. And will thusly remain so no matter how butthurt that makes you

 

[Faun]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

Oh, nooo's, it's ranting now.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

"Hurts me personally..."

Good.

 

[Carla_Danger]

lol

At least Pubes has a sense of humor.

You continuously act like a mentally challenged child, off to ignore with you

Is it a pretend ignore, or the real deal?

 

[Carla_Danger]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

Thank you, Ted Haggard.

 

[gallantwarrior]

As long as you understand that "love" is a human construct and has nothing to do with otherwise "normal biological relationships.

There is no normal in biology , there is what works and what's reached it's evolutionary end.
normal is also a human construct.
Thanks for playing.

Sorry to disappoint, but biologically expressed, one male+one female = normal. Anything else is not "normal" in any other context than a human emotional construct. Unless you would claim that humanity has reached its evolutionary end and as a species should expire due to lack of "normal" biological behavior.

Oh, yeah, thanks for playing. Too bad the rules do not favor your game.
It's all OK, though. Homosexuals and lesbians, if "normal" should "breed" themselves out of existence fairly soon.

 

[gallantwarrior]

And yet your camp focuses on who marries whom?

What business is it of yours who marries who? You are an Alaskan, and of all the Americans I have known in my life, those bad boys and bad girls were the most freedom loving freaks of all. They were wonderful.

C'mon! Now you're reading nonexistence content into my statements. I have said this before...I could care less who fucks who, or how they do it. I'm not a fan of PDAs, regardless of the source. But I do believe that when one demands respect for one's opinions, one should extend the same respect to others. Doesn't seem to be the case when gays/lesbians/what-the-fuck-ever attack those whose religion guides their opinions otherwise. If the baker doesn't want to bake your cake, the photographer doesn't want to photograph your wedding, on and on... move on and find someone else who will take your money. What's the deal with all the lawsuits?

 

[gallantwarrior]

Your math is as abysmal as your English. The kooks are not on my side, and the majority is not on your side.

There is no math to it. You kooks will lose. You always do. You either ride or collide with us. There is no other option.

No, we don't always lose. We're the ones who win. You're the ones that are on the side of the Nazis. Like the idiot Germans, you don't get it.

But you will.

Funny about winning...since no real offspring can come of such "same sex" unions, eventually normalcy will reign...provided the government feel good PCers eventually fall to the wayside, as they must.

Well, you have to understand how homosexuality is manifested.

A sexual deviant molests an infant/toddler. The molestation is in the form of play, wherein there is much smiling and cooing... the play involves the stimulation of the genitals which triggers a premature hormonal reaction that imprints the experiences... associating sexual stimulation with play, resulting in the relating of sexual attraction to the gender of the molester.

Do not project your experiences on others.

The age of the rape is critical, in that during infancy and toddler development, speech and long term memory are not developed, thus there is no chance that the child could, even innocently relate its experience when "Uncle Cab touched his privates" or any memory of the encounter.

The perspective being that they 'had always been that way'... .

More projection.

This is why you will find that homosexuals relate sex with "FUN", as demonstrated by the endless parade of Deviants who demand that the human physiological standard 'conflates FUCKING with Marriage'.

Dude...sex IS fun. If not, you're doing it wrong.

Sex is merely 'fucking'... OKA: FUN.

They simply have no means to accept that sex is purposed for procreation... as they lack the objectivity to even recognize that otherwise SELF EVIDENT, thus obvious fact of nature.

Most sex is not for procreation.

You are right, most sex is for control.

 

[gallantwarrior]

Ok you believe Gallup. Bless your heart.

Umm, Gallup wasn't alone in finding those results. Virtually every pollster determined most Americans supported gay marriage. Just how fragile is your position?

No they don't. You like guys we get it for God's sake. You have your rights with no judgement. Why does everyone have to agree with your position? Straight people don't. Get gay married butt fuck and move on already.

You're simply wrong. Like I said, virtually every poll showed a majority of people favored legalizing gay marriage.

Civil Rights

You can wish this wasn't the case, but you can't change reality.

You do understand that polls can, and are, often skewed the way the pollster wants, don't you.

 

[gallantwarrior]

And we are not anywhere near interested support in polygamous marriage.

Support for polygamy is rising. But it s not the new gay marriage. - The Washington Post

But while support for polygamy is rising, it has a ways to go before it catches up with same-sex marriage, and there are plenty of reasons it's unlikely to catch on in anywhere near the same way.

For now, it's illegal nationwide, recent legal attempt to overturn bans have been unsuccessful, and public support is low. But that support is increasing.

According to data from Gallup, support has increased from 5 percent in 2006 to 16 percent today. The biggest one-year jump happened in 2011, after TLC's "Sister Wives," about a polygamist family who lived in Utah and later Nevada (the Colliers also have appeared on the show), first aired.

Based upon the logic used to legitimize "gay" marriage, polygamy and polyandry cannot be legitimately denied.

 

[gallantwarrior]

"Gay Activists Demand Churches Lose Their Tax Exempt Status… Already?!"

Remember how the leftists said all of the Christian worrying over the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage was bunk? Christians pointed to other countries where the church had lost its religious liberties. The left said they were crazy. Well, leftists are already foaming at the mouth calling for just that. Hold onto your butts…

Well—it just so happens the New York Times published an article literally titled…

“Now’s the Time To End Tax Exemptions for Religious Institutions”
The argument in a nutshell: churches should now be considered “political” entities, therefore the government should be allowed to take away their tax exempt status. Of course the entire goal here is to effectively terminate the church.

Boom. Would an ‘I told you so’ here be too cliché? In record time too!



Read more: Gay Activists Demand Churches Lose Their Tax Exempt Status... Already Louder With Crowder

Now... knowing that, it should be clear to you the deception in which our in-house cultists have been advising you.

Again... they are Relativists, thus unworthy of your trust.

Churches should never have had tax exempt status.

LOL! That's because the Constitution precludes congress from establishing any law that precludes the free exercise of Religion.

(The Constitution is a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed; see: The US Constitution.)

Wait...I have been led to believe that the Constitution was pretty much like an unfortunate piece of toilet paper trailing Obama's shoe...

 

[Jarlaxle]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

No matter how many times you shriek that to the heavens, it is still bullshit.

 

[Jarlaxle]

You are right, most sex is for control.

Actually, no...most sex is recreational!

 

[gallantwarrior]

You are right, most sex is for control.

Actually, no...most sex is recreational!

It's a toss up.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

No matter how many times you shriek that to the heavens, it is still bullshit.

ROFLMNAO...

Irony.

Marriage IS the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

Thank you, Ted Haggard.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[konradv]

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Carla_Danger]

POLITICO SAID:

“Why does everyone have to agree with your position?”

They don't, and no one says they must agree.

Anyone is at liberty to believe marriage is between only a man and a woman in the context of religious marriage ritual, with the understanding that as a fact of law that's not the case.

Marriage IS, in the context of Nature and the design of the Human Species: THE JOINING of ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN!

Thank you, Ted Haggard.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Syriusly]

Same sex marriage

Marriage, is the Joining of One Man and One Woman.

And now, one man and another man, or one woman and another woman.

He said marriage, not mirage marriage

Marriage is marriage- Americans can get married in all 50 states now- regardless of the race of their spouse- or the gender of their spouse.

You can call legal marriage whatever the hell you want- but then again you are the kind of Christian who hopes that Americans who disagree with you get kneecapped.