Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

[toobfreak]

Mr. Heston was well paid to say it

What was he paid?

 

[Pop23]

Trump better keep his tiny little hands off my guns

I doubt there are many that want their hands on "your gun"........

We know Trumps hands are too small for that

I doubt anyone's hands are that small

 

[Pop23]

More Guns Do Not Stop More Crimes, Evidence Shows

More firearms do not keep people safe, hard numbers show. Why do so many Americans believe the opposite?

More Guns Do Not Stop More Crimes, Evidence Shows

Assume that's true.

Are you saying that a home invasion or mass shooting is equally survivable for one who is armed and one who is not?



Gun may not decrease crime, but that's not really the point.

How would we know?. Criminals that decide not to commit crimes because they found out their victims owned a gun don't report that fact.

 

[toobfreak]

Do you know WHY they want to ban and confiscate guns? Because they hate the right and this is a way to attack something the right holds dear. If liberals thought banning toilet paper would piss off the right they would ban it. Yes they are that petty.

Some may do it out of spite, but the real objective is the communist revolution. Free people with guns will never bow to the communist state or except the naive communist ideal.

if the big bad gov'ment wanted to come after your guns, there ain't enough AKs in the nation to help defend y'all.

Really, fool? I think you have it the other way around. The gun owners of America are more numerous than all the armies of the world combined, and are supported by state and local police, not to mention active and ex-vets. The only way they will ever be disarmed is by one tiny small group at a time, which is why it is important to never give an inch.

 

[Astrostar]

The anti-gun movement has held out the falsehood that they are not coming after people’s guns as a central core of their effort to hide their existential goal. The lid was blown off that charade when a 97-year-old man who previously occupied a position at the top level of our country (retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens) advocated for the abolition of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the paper of record – The New York Times.

The Second Amendment was put in place and obtained its lofty position as the “Second Amendment” right behind the most essential amendment giving us free speech etc., etc., for a reason. The people who founded this country did not trust government. Even though they were possibly the most talented, intelligent and capable group of people ever assembled for one cause, they lacked the arrogance of most people in government that government was or is the answer.
The IRS has 2,300 Special Agents armed with AR-15s, P90 tactical rifles and other heavy weaponry. The IRS recently spent $12 million on ammo and weapons.Why Are Federal Bureaucrats Buying Guns And Ammo? $158 Million Spent By Non-Military Agencies
The fact is that deaths from long guns average one per day. If you exclude suicides, gun death by hand guns are 42 per day. If you include all gun deaths (suicides) by hand guns it is 104 per day. We are led to believe by their rhetoric that once the anti-gun goal of banning certain long guns has been achieved (guns responsible for one death per day), they will stop and not go after guns that are used to kill 104 per day. Balderdash.
Those of us who have some experience in life know that is not the way it works with the Left. They play a long game and are happy to move the ball forward with mini steps until they achieve their goal.
I don’t trust the government and this country was established on that bedrock principle. I don’t trust the people who are lying to us about what their true intentions are about gun control just like they lied to us about government-run health care. They want all guns in the control of government-controlled apparatchiks.

As Charlton Heston said: “From my cold, dead hands.”

"Charleston Heston movies are no longer in demand."

The anti-gun movement has held out the falsehood that they are not coming after people’s guns as a central core of their effort to hide their existential goal. The lid was blown off that charade when a 97-year-old man who previously occupied a position at the top level of our country (retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens) advocated for the abolition of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the paper of record – The New York Times.

The Second Amendment was put in place and obtained its lofty position as the “Second Amendment” right behind the most essential amendment giving us free speech etc., etc., for a reason. The people who founded this country did not trust government. Even though they were possibly the most talented, intelligent and capable group of people ever assembled for one cause, they lacked the arrogance of most people in government that government was or is the answer.
The IRS has 2,300 Special Agents armed with AR-15s, P90 tactical rifles and other heavy weaponry. The IRS recently spent $12 million on ammo and weapons.Why Are Federal Bureaucrats Buying Guns And Ammo? $158 Million Spent By Non-Military Agencies
The fact is that deaths from long guns average one per day. If you exclude suicides, gun death by hand guns are 42 per day. If you include all gun deaths (suicides) by hand guns it is 104 per day. We are led to believe by their rhetoric that once the anti-gun goal of banning certain long guns has been achieved (guns responsible for one death per day), they will stop and not go after guns that are used to kill 104 per day. Balderdash.
Those of us who have some experience in life know that is not the way it works with the Left. They play a long game and are happy to move the ball forward with mini steps until they achieve their goal.
I don’t trust the government and this country was established on that bedrock principle. I don’t trust the people who are lying to us about what their true intentions are about gun control just like they lied to us about government-run health care. They want all guns in the control of government-controlled apparatchiks.

As Charlton Heston said: “From my cold, dead hands.”

Good 'ol Heston: "Charlton Heston movies are no longer in demand...

 

[Valerie]

Trump better keep his tiny little hands off my guns

yes, we've never heard any Democrat politician suggest what trump did:

the government should "take the guns first, go through due process second"

 

[miketx]

Mr. Heston was well paid to say it

come get them.

 

[Valerie]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

The 2nd is a clear prohibition against Congress. If they abuse the power we have consented to give them, what should they expect?

 

[Valerie]

according to you, the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution is "a CLEAR prohibition against Congress"

we call it "due process" for a reason!

 

[Pop23]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

With lots and lots of backup I would think

 

[miketx]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

No one is taking my guns without killing me.

 

[Valerie]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

With lots and lots of backup I would think

lots and lots of back up from your uncle vlad?

 

[miketx]

according to you, the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution is "a CLEAR prohibition against Congress"

we call it "due process" for a reason!

Yet you only want due process when it is used to destroy this country. It is that reason why we should stop at nothing to eliminate liberal traitors.

 

[Pop23]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

With lots and lots of backup I would think

lots and lots of back up from your uncle vlad?

I'm irish, so It would be Uncle Pat. But he's dead, so are the rest of my Irish uncles..........

But I do ramble

 

[Valerie]

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

The 2nd is a clear prohibition against Congress. If they abuse the power we have consented to give them, what should they expect?

congressional law makers expect rational legal arguments based on constitutional precedent.

why are you emo rambos so afraid of rule of law??

 

[rightwinger]

come get them.

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

No one is taking my guns without killing me.

You would pee your pants

 

[Valerie]

according to you, the 2nd amendment to the US Constitution is "a CLEAR prohibition against Congress"

we call it "due process" for a reason!

Yet you only want due process when it is used to destroy this country. It is that reason why we should stop at nothing to eliminate liberal traitors.

destroying the country would be taking the law into your own hands...

destroying the country would be defying rule of law and taking up arms against your country...

destroying the country would be destroying the security of a free state!

 

[OKTexas]

More Guns Do Not Stop More Crimes, Evidence Shows

More firearms do not keep people safe, hard numbers show. Why do so many Americans believe the opposite?

More Guns Do Not Stop More Crimes, Evidence Shows

1.5 million defensive gun uses per year say otherwise.


.

 

[OKTexas]

if due process legally clarifies what qualifies as your right to bear certain firearms, you would take up arms against your government?

The 2nd is a clear prohibition against Congress. If they abuse the power we have consented to give them, what should they expect?

congressional law makers expect rational legal arguments based on constitutional precedent.

why are you emo rambos so afraid of rule of law??

The rule of law has killed more people than criminals, about 100 million world wide. Every damn one of them had their right to self defense with firearms removed first.


.