RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
If you support the NRA & vote for those who support the NRA & vote against sensible gun legislation, then yes, you are somewhat responsible.
AS a Trump voter, you are responsible for his actions.
Why do you assume I voted for Trump? I didn't. I didn't vote at all because I refuse to vote for any candidate that makes me want to puke
The NRA is not responsible for anyone else's criminal acts.
So now tell me why you think I am responsible if some psycho uses a semiautomatic rifle in a mass murder?
And FYI because I happen to own several semiautomatic rifles is not an acceptable answer
The NRA backs certain legislation. Either the politicians vote their way or they get a bad rating. Asshole right wingers will not vote for those with poor NRA ratings.
When the assault rifle ban was not renewed thanks to NRA backed Republicans, they bew\came responsible each & every time those weapons are used in a crime.
When closing gun purchasing loopholes were defeated, every time a gun purchased in that manner is used in a crime, it is their responsibility.
See, you avoided it yet again.
What specific legislation did the NRA back that allowed a mass shooting to occur?
And you have yet to realize that a so called "assault" rifle is no different from any other semiautomatic rifle that has been available since the 1860's. The cosmetic doodads do not make it more deadly.
And what specific loopholes are you talking about? Do you even know?
The only person responsible for any crime is the person committing the crime. The guy who happens to own a similar firearm who was sitting at home eating dinner with his wife is not responsible for some ass hat who goes on a shooting spree
Are you just plain dense? Gun nuts keep telling me they need an assault type rifle or else they can't frerakin defend themselves yet can't admit that a mass shooter with one will do more damage than a rifle that is not semi-automatic with a large magazine. I see you agree with their stupidity.
And please will you assholes quit with the " there isn't such a thing as an assault rifle" bullshit.
Wrong......the rifle doesn't matter, there isn't one mass shooting that couldn't have been done with a pistol or multiple pistols, or a shotgun or combination.....the rifle with magazines are just easy to attack so the anti-gunners attack them...as the Judge who gave the injunction against California's new magazine ban stated, if you ban anthing over a 30 round magazine the shooters will use 15-19, then they ban those, then they will use 10 rounds then they will move on to all magazines, then they will limit revolvers to 5 shots..
The determining factor in these shootings is 1) they are gun free zones....2) the ones in confined spaces it doesn't matter if they use an AR-15 or pistols....
Notice....the baseball shooter with a magazine fed rifle only got 6 hits and only one of them was serious.....because of the gun free zone he attacked was wide open....
And, a guy with a rental truck killed 89 people and injured over 400.........banning rifles with magazines doesn't stop mass shooters...what stops them are people with guns shooting back.
See, you avoided it yet again.
The attacks could have been carried out with handguns, a bolt action rifle, a knife, two knives, a baseball bat, a chair, an umbrella or a soft serve ice cream cone; but would have the body count been as high.
Come on Mr Chickenshit.
Admit it.
Quit hiding.
Come out & say it.
The body counts would most like be higher with the assault type rifle.
When was the last time we shipped freight on a gun. Do ya think, just possibly, that a truck has other uses than killing? Bringing it up every freakin time is just being stupid.