Nutz
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2014
- 14,814
- 1,810
- 265
- Banned
- #81
The difference is, Nutz, I didn't simply argue with an opinion. I made an opinion based on the facts, which as I see them condone the use of jury nullification, and say that it is unconstitutional to disallow the apprisal of a jury of their constitutional right to nullification by the prosecution or the defense.
And I was establishing fact and provided no opinion. For some reason, you chose to attribute an opinion to me.