You know what I want from my government?

[bripat9643]

I want our country to be more like Norway, Sweden, Japan, South Korea or Germany. A country with high standards that gives a shit about its people....I want our anti-trust laws enforced and the rich to pay their taxes!!!! I couldn't name a single nation of the top 50 highest gdp's on earth doesn't that have any government within their economy and there for their people, but I can name some with very little like Somalia, haiti, Congo, Central African Republic and other such backwards shit holes!

I don't want any of that shit. You pay for it. I want government to keep its hand out of my pocket and leave me alone.

 

[SmokeALib]

Which is why the FF put in the second amendment.

Who knows. We may one day have to defend ourselves from out own Govt. The FF were very smart men who did one hell of a job with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. They were far sighted as hell.

The second is an out-dated piece of legislation that needs either amending or abolishing, not least because most of the gun nuts have interpreted it wrong.

They were reasonably smart and reasonably far sighted but were far from infallible.

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

 

[bripat9643]

Republicans only want high paying jobs that require no skills. That's all.

Yep, they want a large peon population of slaves to make the ultra rich ever richer. Republicans suck ass!!!!

Democrats are the ones who keep importing the peons.

 

[forkup]

Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

Nice false narrative. Typical of the left. The U.S. Constitution explicitly grants the Senate advise and consent powers. You people want to view the presidency as a dictator and that's simply not the case. If Obama wants to appoint a Supreme Court justice then the onus his on him to choose one which the Republican-controlled Senate will approve of.

Well the problem is, if you refuse to even meet with the candidate let alone hold hearings you are not acting in good faith, it's that simple. It is definetly not what the founding fathers had in mind when they drew up the article. The advice and consent part was supposed to provide checks and balances, not as it is used now, a legal loophole to not do anything for purely political reasons.

 

[forkup]

Which is why the FF put in the second amendment.

Who knows. We may one day have to defend ourselves from out own Govt. The FF were very smart men who did one hell of a job with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. They were far sighted as hell.

The second is an out-dated piece of legislation that needs either amending or abolishing, not least because most of the gun nuts have interpreted it wrong.

They were reasonably smart and reasonably far sighted but were far from infallible.

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

 

[xband]

Republicans only want high paying jobs that require no skills. That's all.

Yep, they want a large peon population of slaves to make the ultra rich ever richer. Republicans suck ass!!!!

Democrats are the ones who keep importing the peons.

Them dad burn Democrats are always doing their best effort to upset the apple cart.

 

[SmokeALib]

Which is why the FF put in the second amendment.

Who knows. We may one day have to defend ourselves from out own Govt. The FF were very smart men who did one hell of a job with our Constitution and Bill of Rights. They were far sighted as hell.

The second is an out-dated piece of legislation that needs either amending or abolishing, not least because most of the gun nuts have interpreted it wrong.

They were reasonably smart and reasonably far sighted but were far from infallible.

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

 

[xband]

The second is an out-dated piece of legislation that needs either amending or abolishing, not least because most of the gun nuts have interpreted it wrong.

They were reasonably smart and reasonably far sighted but were far from infallible.

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

 

[forkup]

The second is an out-dated piece of legislation that needs either amending or abolishing, not least because most of the gun nuts have interpreted it wrong.

They were reasonably smart and reasonably far sighted but were far from infallible.

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact implies you have the capability to prove something. What's yours? You have no information on me whatsoever, just what I posted. So no you weren't stating fact, just an opinion. Btw you still haven't substansively tried to counter my point.

 

[SmokeALib]

Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

 

[Norman]

"I live for my free shit. I AM NO PARASITE!"

 

[Dr Grump]

[
Hell - let's just abolish the entire constitution.

No. There are some good bits in there!

 

[xband]

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

I humbly thank you for your critical critique. If you want to battle, I will battle with you.

 

[Dr Grump]

The 2nd Amendment is far from out dated and should never be amended or abolished.

I'm sure the dead in Paris, Nice and San Bernardino would have loved to have had a gun to defend themselves with.

After all the European govt. disarmed all their citizens for their own "safety." And San Bernardino was a "gun free" area. Guess no one told that scum bag murderer and his ISIS girlfriend that.

You don't want a gun then don't own one and hope like hell that you never need one.

I've never needed a gun. I know of noone I know (and I know a lot of people) who have ever needed a gun.

You may talk about Paris and Nice etc, and gun free zones. The second really helped during 9-11 didn't it? And Oklahoma. It really stopped the US from having one of the biggest homicide rates with regard to firearms in the western world, didn't it?

 

[Dr Grump]

I don't want any of that shit. You pay for it. I want government to keep its hand out of my pocket and leave me alone.

Then go live in Venezuela. You'd fit right in....

 

[forkup]

Or alternitivly you can look at it as a legal document, subject to change as society faces new challenges, instead of some kind of bible, where political groups have there own interpretation of what's important. Cause the right constantly seems to claim the left is trying to abolish the second amendment while at the same time having no respect for the second article of the constitution that is supposed to make the appointment of a supreme court justice anything but the political farce it is now. It all strikes me as terribly hypocritical.

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

Again where's your proof I support Clinton? For the record I'm European, my wife's American and my kid has dual nationality. If I would live in the US I would vote for Clinton but that's because I consider Trump dangerous. I don't like her but to me she looks like a politician. Anyways your FACTS proved to be opinions. And you STILL haven't tried to counter my point

 

[SmokeALib]

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

I humbly thank you for your critical critique. If you want to battle, I will battle with you.

Nah. Time to go to work.
In case you're not familiar with the term:
Work - It's what us conservatives do to earn money to take care of our families.
Later.

 

[Norman]

The 2nd Amendment is far from out dated and should never be amended or abolished.

I'm sure the dead in Paris, Nice and San Bernardino would have loved to have had a gun to defend themselves with.

After all the European govt. disarmed all their citizens for their own "safety." And San Bernardino was a "gun free" area. Guess no one told that scum bag murderer and his ISIS girlfriend that.

You don't want a gun then don't own one and hope like hell that you never need one.

I've never needed a gun. I know of noone I know (and I know a lot of people) who have ever needed a gun.

You may talk about Paris and Nice etc, and gun free zones. The second really helped during 9-11 didn't it? And Oklahoma. It really stopped the US from having one of the biggest homicide rates with regard to firearms in the western world, didn't it?

I don't need guns. Ban them.

Classic liberal... dun't need something? BAN IT!

 

[SmokeALib]

That's because you're a leftist government leech.

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

Again where's your proof I support Clinton? For the record I'm European, my wife's American and my kid has dual nationality. If I would live in the US I would vote for Clinton but that's because I consider Trump dangerous. I don't like her but to me she looks like a politician. Anyways your FACTS proved to be opinions. And you STILL haven't tried to counter my point

Your statements are irrelevant. This is a U.S. message board. Go find a socialist European forum to pollute.

 

[forkup]

You know, throwing out names just exposes the fact that you have no substansive comeback. It's admitting defeat in a debate setting. Just so you know.

I simply stated a fact.

A fact has to be proved and you only stated an opinion.

If you support Hillary Clinton, you are a leftist government leech.
That is a fact.
This fact, I might add, also makes you a moron. But that's just my opinion.

Again where's your proof I support Clinton? For the record I'm European, my wife's American and my kid has dual nationality. If I would live in the US I would vote for Clinton but that's because I consider Trump dangerous. I don't like her but to me she looks like a politician. Anyways your FACTS proved to be opinions. And you STILL haven't tried to counter my point

Your statements are irrelevant. This is a U.S. message board. Go find a socialist European forum to pollute.

Ah but my statments are relevant first of because you don't seem to be able to offer an effective rebuttal, only dogma and insults, second because I have a lot of family living in the US and I or my daughter might want to move there at some point in our lives, thirdly because who becomes the American president has global consequenses and lastly because I see a lot of assumptions about how it is to live in social democracies, something I am infinetly more qualified to judge then people of wich most haven't even visited Europe.