You know what?

[OKTexas]

And their nudist enclaves are clearly identified, allowing all participants free choice. Nudist does not equal liberal.

Children do not have a choice..........

Yanno, once upon a time, I lived in Europe, where nudist parks, bathing areas, etc, were freely available (ever seen a nudist on a bicycle, or playing tennis?). I regularly took my daughter to the nudist bathing areas at the local park. Personally, I have no problems with nudism, but lots of other people do. Swimming pools and saunas in Europe provided "his", "hers", and "ours" areas. I don't view nudism as a perversion, but many in this country are unaccustomed to the free expression of nudism. As far as allowing men/boys into locker rooms frequented by my daughter/granddaughters...yeah, not so much. It isn't common practice in the US and the common practices of a country should be respected.

I can only go to the nudist beach when I become flaccid and unresponsive, maybe around 80 years old...

Ever heard of a towel.

Hang a towel on the woody?

Nope, just as a cover till the situation normalizes.

 

[Moonglow]

The OP is correct that transgenders have been using restrooms they prefer for years.

If you never thought you saw one or weren't sure if the person was a man or woman then it was a genuine transgender. If the person in the ladies room is clearly a man then he is likely a pervert. The odds of encountering a pedophile or rapist is far greater than the likelihood of meeting a transgender.

The law says the man in the wife-beater shirt and full beard can use the women's restroom if he claims he feels like a woman that day. We should at least specify in the law that they have to look like the gender of what they claim to be.

Liberal solutions always make things worse. They can no longer claim to be concerned about the safety of women and children after this. There have already been instances of perverts getting pictures and one little girl attacked. Yes, perverts will do things law or no law, but that doesn't excuse making it easier for them.

Why didn't we leave things as they were? Transgenders were dealing with it just fine and men knew they couldn't walk in anywhere without looking suspicious.

For the liberals who think it's no big deal for little girls to see naked boys or men, if you really believed that you wouldn't be claiming to do this to spare boys who think they are girls from showering with other boys. You're saying that girls born as girls should just deal with male bodies in the shower, but boys who think they are girls should not deal with seeing other male bodies in the shower. You have proven to be hypocrites because this isn't about helping anyone.

It's about attacking morals and decency to bring about chaos and more division.

The radical left is cheering as we are one step closer to tearing down America.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Seems to me that all of you are.......hell, you even said yourself that the legal age was 10 years old at one time and that you had no problem with going back to that....there are a couple of other leftards that are good with it.

I said that the ancestors did not have any problems with it.....What they did in the past is gone, over..You can't judge the past with today's morals, but you can get banned for accusing fellow posters of being a pedophile...

Dude, I am simply saying that you are fine with the age of consent being lowered to the age of ten.....people can come to their own conclusions.Just because you are fine with it doesn't mean that you would engage in it...it simply means that you would condone it and GLSEN and the LGBT are well on their way to doing just that. It's a fact and if USB wants to ban me for pointing out the facts? Well, it's not like I don't have other places to post. I am about truth and I don't care how ugly it may seem or whom it may offend. I would rather be told the ugly truth then to be told a pretty lie.

People live longer so age increases on reproduction..Just like reproduction decreases or increases with the condition of the economy..I have no desire to have any little girls sexually, right now I'm having nothing sexually with any females, because I am taking a vacation from their inanity of relationships based on income potential...When I am ready, she better have hair to shave and can deep throat for at least 3 minutes...Which means I like them experienced and older, so they can spend dough on me for a change.....

Good luck with all that.....women may claim that they like to be liberated, but they still want to be "wined and dined". Ever since I woke up as to what is coming towards us, I have had absolutely no desire to date. It would be just one more person for me to have to look out for when the SHTF. Stock up on food and water and I mean the kind of food that doesn't require cooking. You need bottled water, batteries, flashlights and some way to protect yourself. It is so obvious to me as to what the ones in power are getting ready to let loose on us. Don't be that guy that is caught flat-footed.

I bought 43 acres with woods, live water, game and caves.....I is ready...

You must be the pedobear.

 

[Moonglow]

Showering with children is getting clean, not hot and bothered.

Hmmm

Just how exactly would you know that?

You never raised kids?

 

[Moonglow]

I said that the ancestors did not have any problems with it.....What they did in the past is gone, over..You can't judge the past with today's morals, but you can get banned for accusing fellow posters of being a pedophile...

Dude, I am simply saying that you are fine with the age of consent being lowered to the age of ten.....people can come to their own conclusions.Just because you are fine with it doesn't mean that you would engage in it...it simply means that you would condone it and GLSEN and the LGBT are well on their way to doing just that. It's a fact and if USB wants to ban me for pointing out the facts? Well, it's not like I don't have other places to post. I am about truth and I don't care how ugly it may seem or whom it may offend. I would rather be told the ugly truth then to be told a pretty lie.

People live longer so age increases on reproduction..Just like reproduction decreases or increases with the condition of the economy..I have no desire to have any little girls sexually, right now I'm having nothing sexually with any females, because I am taking a vacation from their inanity of relationships based on income potential...When I am ready, she better have hair to shave and can deep throat for at least 3 minutes...Which means I like them experienced and older, so they can spend dough on me for a change.....

Good luck with all that.....women may claim that they like to be liberated, but they still want to be "wined and dined". Ever since I woke up as to what is coming towards us, I have had absolutely no desire to date. It would be just one more person for me to have to look out for when the SHTF. Stock up on food and water and I mean the kind of food that doesn't require cooking. You need bottled water, batteries, flashlights and some way to protect yourself. It is so obvious to me as to what the ones in power are getting ready to let loose on us. Don't be that guy that is caught flat-footed.

I bought 43 acres with woods, live water, game and caves.....I is ready...

You must be the pedobear.

There are several saplings with knot holes...

 

[Moonglow]

I've seriously had enough of this bathroom bullshit.

It isn't about transgender people using the bathroom--either bathroom. I don't give a flying rat's ass which one they use. I'm not the fucking bathroom police. I go in there, do my business, and get out. I'm too busy answering nature's call to care who else is in the bathroom with me.

And honestly, actual transgender people have been using the bathrooms of their choice decades before this whole thing became an issue. I myself have never met one, nor seen one (probably because they conceal their...condition, so well). I doubt I ever will. So I don't give a damn what bathroom they use.

I have no problem with that. But these laws and policies allowing them to use the bathrooms of their choice aren't necessary. They only provide a legal gateway for perverts, child molesters and rapists to walk in to the women's bathroom in particular and do unspeakable things to the occupants. These perverts would have been better off not knowing there were such laws. Existing law should have served as a sufficient deterrent.

It bears repeating, though, that transgender individuals have been able to freely use the bathroom of their choice for a long time now, without anyone noticing. There's no need for this nonsense. No need for laws, no need for any of this.

But as for school locker rooms, that's a whole 'nother ballgame. Parents have legitimate concerns that their children will be exposed to not only the anatomy of the opposite sex, but that their children's right to privacy may be compromised. It's interesting to see how the rights of every other biological girl in the locker room all pale in comparison to the boy who identifies as a girl disrobing before them.

That's the liberal definition of "fairness" and "inclusivity" speaking. I call it "inclusion by exclusion"; or elevating the rights of one group of people over another group of people, because "inclusiveness." I wouldn't blame any parent for pulling their child out of a school who operates under such policies.

Both sides have legitimate points, but both sides are also being woefully irrational. I've been convinced that there will never be an amicable solution to this problem. Ever.

The problem is, the last couple of years there has been an extreme amount of transgender awareness created by SJWs.

This has made a percentage of the female population( understandably?) Threatened by transexuals where as before, they didnt care as much. So we are experiencing a time of great hostility and fury towards transwomen from some females.

This always existed by is heightened right now. So transwomen are indeed in need of extra protection(at the moment) as they face slander, vilification and violence from the female population, who have been literally antagonized by the SJWs.

The vast majority of women and girls are indifferent but the percentage of infuriated females is at an all time high.

For every action, there is a reaction.

Have you been to Bangkok? For a young Thai femme boy?

 

[Moonglow]

The OP is correct that transgenders have been using restrooms they prefer for years.

If you never thought you saw one or weren't sure if the person was a man or woman then it was a genuine transgender. If the person in the ladies room is clearly a man then he is likely a pervert. The odds of encountering a pedophile or rapist is far greater than the likelihood of meeting a transgender.

The law says the man in the wife-beater shirt and full beard can use the women's restroom if he claims he feels like a woman that day. We should at least specify in the law that they have to look like the gender of what they claim to be.

Liberal solutions always make things worse. They can no longer claim to be concerned about the safety of women and children after this. There have already been instances of perverts getting pictures and one little girl attacked. Yes, perverts will do things law or no law, but that doesn't excuse making it easier for them.

Why didn't we leave things as they were? Transgenders were dealing with it just fine and men knew they couldn't walk in anywhere without looking suspicious.

For the liberals who think it's no big deal for little girls to see naked boys or men, if you really believed that you wouldn't be claiming to do this to spare boys who think they are girls from showering with other boys. You're saying that girls born as girls should just deal with male bodies in the shower, but boys who think they are girls should not deal with seeing other male bodies in the shower. You have proven to be hypocrites because this isn't about helping anyone.

It's about attacking morals and decency to bring about chaos and more division.

The radical left is cheering as we are one step closer to tearing down America.

Is that what you said when a white woman married a black man?
Where you on the steps of an Alabama public school when a little black girl was escorted my the military to use that public school?

 

[gallantwarrior]

So Dale, which liberals are pedophiles?

Seems to me that all of you are.......hell, you even said yourself that the legal age was 10 years old at one time and that you had no problem with going back to that....there are a couple of other leftards that are good with it.

I said that the ancestors did not have any problems with it.....What they did in the past is gone, over..You can't judge the past with today's morals, but you can get banned for accusing fellow posters of being a pedophile...

Dude, I am simply saying that you are fine with the age of consent being lowered to the age of ten.....people can come to their own conclusions.Just because you are fine with it doesn't mean that you would engage in it...it simply means that you would condone it and GLSEN and the LGBT are well on their way to doing just that. It's a fact and if USB wants to ban me for pointing out the facts? Well, it's not like I don't have other places to post. I am about truth and I don't care how ugly it may seem or whom it may offend. I would rather be told the ugly truth then to be told a pretty lie.

People live longer so age increases on reproduction..Just like reproduction decreases or increases with the condition of the economy..I have no desire to have any little girls sexually, right now I'm having nothing sexually with any females, because I am taking a vacation from their inanity of relationships based on income potential...When I am ready, she better have hair to shave and can deep throat for at least 3 minutes...Which means I like them experienced and older, so they can spend dough on me for a change.....

Good luck with all that.....women may claim that they like to be liberated, but they still want to be "wined and dined". Ever since I woke up as to what is coming towards us, I have had absolutely no desire to date. It would be just one more person for me to have to look out for when the SHTF. Stock up on food and water and I mean the kind of food that doesn't require cooking. You need bottled water, batteries, flashlights and some way to protect yourself. It is so obvious to me as to what the ones in power are getting ready to let loose on us. Don't be that guy that is caught flat-footed.

'Specially with no bitch to cook for you?! Just joking!

 

[TemplarKormac]

Showering with children is getting clean, not hot and bothered.

Hmmm

Just how exactly would you know that?

You never raised kids?

No? Even if I had, why would I want to shower with them anyhow?

Creep.

 

[Moonglow]

I've seriously had enough of this bathroom bullshit.

It isn't about transgender people using the bathroom--either bathroom. I don't give a flying rat's ass which one they use. I'm not the fucking bathroom police. I go in there, do my business, and get out. I'm too busy answering nature's call to care who else is in the bathroom with me.

And honestly, actual transgender people have been using the bathrooms of their choice decades before this whole thing became an issue. I myself have never met one, nor seen one (probably because they conceal their...condition, so well). I doubt I ever will. So I don't give a damn what bathroom they use.

I have no problem with that. But these laws and policies allowing them to use the bathrooms of their choice aren't necessary. They only provide a legal gateway for perverts, child molesters and rapists to walk in to the women's bathroom in particular and do unspeakable things to the occupants. These perverts would have been better off not knowing there were such laws. Existing law should have served as a sufficient deterrent.

It bears repeating, though, that transgender individuals have been able to freely use the bathroom of their choice for a long time now, without anyone noticing. There's no need for this nonsense. No need for laws, no need for any of this.

But as for school locker rooms, that's a whole 'nother ballgame. Parents have legitimate concerns that their children will be exposed to not only the anatomy of the opposite sex, but that their children's right to privacy may be compromised. It's interesting to see how the rights of every other biological girl in the locker room all pale in comparison to the boy who identifies as a girl disrobing before them.

That's the liberal definition of "fairness" and "inclusivity" speaking. I call it "inclusion by exclusion"; or elevating the rights of one group of people over another group of people, because "inclusiveness." I wouldn't blame any parent for pulling their child out of a school who operates under such policies.

Both sides have legitimate points, but both sides are also being woefully irrational. I've been convinced that there will never be an amicable solution to this problem. Ever.

The problem is, the last couple of years there has been an extreme amount of transgender awareness created by SJWs.

This has made a percentage of the female population( understandably?) Threatened by transexuals where as before, they didnt care as much. So we are experiencing a time of great hostility and fury towards transwomen from some females.

This always existed by is heightened right now. So transwomen are indeed in need of extra protection(at the moment) as they face slander, vilification and violence from the female population, who have been literally antagonized by the SJWs.

The vast majority of women and girls are indifferent but the percentage of infuriated females is at an all time high.

For every action, there is a reaction.

The homersexuals have been campaigning for years about equal rights....

 

[gallantwarrior]

Well goodness. Do you still peek into the other stall to see if the guy next to you is bigger?

No. Do you? Well, I surmise any of them would be bigger than you.

Why do you think "transgendered" guys are going into the women's room? Theirs is bigger there.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So Dale, which liberals are pedophiles?

Seems to me that all of you are.......hell, you even said yourself that the legal age was 10 years old at one time and that you had no problem with going back to that....there are a couple of other leftards that are good with it.

All "liberals"??

You mean like Ted poopy pants, admitted pedo, draft dodger, convicted poacher Nugent? Or Josh Duggar, seen in photos with every Repub prez candidate? How about the creepy old fart in Duck Dynasty that preaches pedophilia in his "church", thumping on his bible? Mike The Huckster Huckabee?

Those are all RWNJ heroes.

.3% of the population is transgender. How many do you think you've shared a bathroom with?

FACT is its the RWNJs who are peeking at other people's pee pees.

 

[Moonglow]

Seems to me that all of you are.......hell, you even said yourself that the legal age was 10 years old at one time and that you had no problem with going back to that....there are a couple of other leftards that are good with it.

I said that the ancestors did not have any problems with it.....What they did in the past is gone, over..You can't judge the past with today's morals, but you can get banned for accusing fellow posters of being a pedophile...

Dude, I am simply saying that you are fine with the age of consent being lowered to the age of ten.....people can come to their own conclusions.Just because you are fine with it doesn't mean that you would engage in it...it simply means that you would condone it and GLSEN and the LGBT are well on their way to doing just that. It's a fact and if USB wants to ban me for pointing out the facts? Well, it's not like I don't have other places to post. I am about truth and I don't care how ugly it may seem or whom it may offend. I would rather be told the ugly truth then to be told a pretty lie.

People live longer so age increases on reproduction..Just like reproduction decreases or increases with the condition of the economy..I have no desire to have any little girls sexually, right now I'm having nothing sexually with any females, because I am taking a vacation from their inanity of relationships based on income potential...When I am ready, she better have hair to shave and can deep throat for at least 3 minutes...Which means I like them experienced and older, so they can spend dough on me for a change.....

Good luck with all that.....women may claim that they like to be liberated, but they still want to be "wined and dined". Ever since I woke up as to what is coming towards us, I have had absolutely no desire to date. It would be just one more person for me to have to look out for when the SHTF. Stock up on food and water and I mean the kind of food that doesn't require cooking. You need bottled water, batteries, flashlights and some way to protect yourself. It is so obvious to me as to what the ones in power are getting ready to let loose on us. Don't be that guy that is caught flat-footed.

'Specially with no bitch to cook for you?! Just joking!

They is alway pork and beans, well there really is not any pork their seems.........

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Do you realize that if the “right” is established for men who claim to “identify as women” to use women's restrooms, then there is no way for this “right” not to be equally extended to women's dressing rooms, locker rooms, and every other sex-segregated facility? On any basis that a creepy perverted man is allowed into a women's restroom, he will have to be allowed also into these other facilities as well.

Trust me, I understand the implications. I just wish certain other liberals would too. Everyone else's rights are irrelevant to transgender rights. Their privacy and security are no longer considered in the pursuit of their ultimate goal. .

How has your security and privacy been subjected to tranny hoe downs?

tranny hoe down?
is that what you yell when a crossdressing street walker trips and falls?
HOE DOWN! HOE DOWN!

 

[Moonglow]

Well goodness. Do you still peek into the other stall to see if the guy next to you is bigger?

No. Do you? Well, I surmise any of them would be bigger than you.

Why do you think "transgendered" guys are going into the women's room? Theirs is bigger there.

What he doesn't understand is, I once had a huge pecker, yet, after several years of having too much sex, I whittled it down to a nub...

 

[gallantwarrior]

And their nudist enclaves are clearly identified, allowing all participants free choice. Nudist does not equal liberal.

Children do not have a choice..........

Yanno, once upon a time, I lived in Europe, where nudist parks, bathing areas, etc, were freely available (ever seen a nudist on a bicycle, or playing tennis?). I regularly took my daughter to the nudist bathing areas at the local park. Personally, I have no problems with nudism, but lots of other people do. Swimming pools and saunas in Europe provided "his", "hers", and "ours" areas. I don't view nudism as a perversion, but many in this country are unaccustomed to the free expression of nudism. As far as allowing men/boys into locker rooms frequented by my daughter/granddaughters...yeah, not so much. It isn't common practice in the US and the common practices of a country should be respected.

I can only go to the nudist beach when I become flaccid and unresponsive, maybe around 80 years old...

I don't need to go to a nudist beach to "get it up". But, that's a common American response. Alas, Alaska has few, if any, nudist beaches...must be too cold (how cold is it?) If you had been to nudist enclaves (they don't just frequent beaches), you would know that not all nudists are super models.

I was a stripper from 18-21 and I sometimes had a hard,,time not getting a erection with a few chicks....

Lack of self control? I used to carry a riding crop when showing my Arabian stallion. A few well-placed slaps...no erection. Hey, try it, stud.

 

[Moonglow]

Do you realize that if the “right” is established for men who claim to “identify as women” to use women's restrooms, then there is no way for this “right” not to be equally extended to women's dressing rooms, locker rooms, and every other sex-segregated facility? On any basis that a creepy perverted man is allowed into a women's restroom, he will have to be allowed also into these other facilities as well.

Trust me, I understand the implications. I just wish certain other liberals would too. Everyone else's rights are irrelevant to transgender rights. Their privacy and security are no longer considered in the pursuit of their ultimate goal. .

How has your security and privacy been subjected to tranny hoe downs?

tranny hoe down?
is that what you yell when a crossdressing street walker trips and falls?
HOE DOWN! HOE DOWN!

No, just the country gurls that square dance..

 

[Moonglow]

Children do not have a choice..........

Yanno, once upon a time, I lived in Europe, where nudist parks, bathing areas, etc, were freely available (ever seen a nudist on a bicycle, or playing tennis?). I regularly took my daughter to the nudist bathing areas at the local park. Personally, I have no problems with nudism, but lots of other people do. Swimming pools and saunas in Europe provided "his", "hers", and "ours" areas. I don't view nudism as a perversion, but many in this country are unaccustomed to the free expression of nudism. As far as allowing men/boys into locker rooms frequented by my daughter/granddaughters...yeah, not so much. It isn't common practice in the US and the common practices of a country should be respected.

I can only go to the nudist beach when I become flaccid and unresponsive, maybe around 80 years old...

I don't need to go to a nudist beach to "get it up". But, that's a common American response. Alas, Alaska has few, if any, nudist beaches...must be too cold (how cold is it?) If you had been to nudist enclaves (they don't just frequent beaches), you would know that not all nudists are super models.

I was a stripper from 18-21 and I sometimes had a hard,,time not getting a erection with a few chicks....

Lack of self control? I used to carry a riding crop when showing my Arabian stallion. A few well-placed slaps...no erection. Hey, try it, stud.

I don't have that problem now as a senior...

 

[gallantwarrior]

I've seriously had enough of this bathroom bullshit.

It isn't about transgender people using the bathroom--either bathroom. I don't give a flying rat's ass which one they use. I'm not the fucking bathroom police. I go in there, do my business, and get out. I'm too busy answering nature's call to care who else is in the bathroom with me.

And honestly, actual transgender people have been using the bathrooms of their choice decades before this whole thing became an issue. I myself have never met one, nor seen one (probably because they conceal their...condition, so well). I doubt I ever will. So I don't give a damn what bathroom they use.

I have no problem with that. But these laws and policies allowing them to use the bathrooms of their choice aren't necessary. They only provide a legal gateway for perverts, child molesters and rapists to walk in to the women's bathroom in particular and do unspeakable things to the occupants. These perverts would have been better off not knowing there were such laws. Existing law should have served as a sufficient deterrent.

It bears repeating, though, that transgender individuals have been able to freely use the bathroom of their choice for a long time now, without anyone noticing. There's no need for this nonsense. No need for laws, no need for any of this.

But as for school locker rooms, that's a whole 'nother ballgame. Parents have legitimate concerns that their children will be exposed to not only the anatomy of the opposite sex, but that their children's right to privacy may be compromised. It's interesting to see how the rights of every other biological girl in the locker room all pale in comparison to the boy who identifies as a girl disrobing before them.

That's the liberal definition of "fairness" and "inclusivity" speaking. I call it "inclusion by exclusion"; or elevating the rights of one group of people over another group of people, because "inclusiveness." I wouldn't blame any parent for pulling their child out of a school who operates under such policies.

Both sides have legitimate points, but both sides are also being woefully irrational. I've been convinced that there will never be an amicable solution to this problem. Ever.

The problem is, the last couple of years there has been an extreme amount of transgender awareness created by SJWs.

This has made a percentage of the female population( understandably?) Threatened by transexuals where as before, they didnt care as much. So we are experiencing a time of great hostility and fury towards transwomen from some females.

This always existed by is heightened right now. So transwomen are indeed in need of extra protection(at the moment) as they face slander, vilification and violence from the female population, who have been literally antagonized by the SJWs.

The vast majority of women and girls are indifferent but the percentage of infuriated females is at an all time high.

For every action, there is a reaction.

Have you been to Bangkok? For a young Thai femme boy?

I believe they call them "cherry boys".

 

[Moonglow]

I've seriously had enough of this bathroom bullshit.

It isn't about transgender people using the bathroom--either bathroom. I don't give a flying rat's ass which one they use. I'm not the fucking bathroom police. I go in there, do my business, and get out. I'm too busy answering nature's call to care who else is in the bathroom with me.

And honestly, actual transgender people have been using the bathrooms of their choice decades before this whole thing became an issue. I myself have never met one, nor seen one (probably because they conceal their...condition, so well). I doubt I ever will. So I don't give a damn what bathroom they use.

I have no problem with that. But these laws and policies allowing them to use the bathrooms of their choice aren't necessary. They only provide a legal gateway for perverts, child molesters and rapists to walk in to the women's bathroom in particular and do unspeakable things to the occupants. These perverts would have been better off not knowing there were such laws. Existing law should have served as a sufficient deterrent.

It bears repeating, though, that transgender individuals have been able to freely use the bathroom of their choice for a long time now, without anyone noticing. There's no need for this nonsense. No need for laws, no need for any of this.

But as for school locker rooms, that's a whole 'nother ballgame. Parents have legitimate concerns that their children will be exposed to not only the anatomy of the opposite sex, but that their children's right to privacy may be compromised. It's interesting to see how the rights of every other biological girl in the locker room all pale in comparison to the boy who identifies as a girl disrobing before them.

That's the liberal definition of "fairness" and "inclusivity" speaking. I call it "inclusion by exclusion"; or elevating the rights of one group of people over another group of people, because "inclusiveness." I wouldn't blame any parent for pulling their child out of a school who operates under such policies.

Both sides have legitimate points, but both sides are also being woefully irrational. I've been convinced that there will never be an amicable solution to this problem. Ever.

The problem is, the last couple of years there has been an extreme amount of transgender awareness created by SJWs.

This has made a percentage of the female population( understandably?) Threatened by transexuals where as before, they didnt care as much. So we are experiencing a time of great hostility and fury towards transwomen from some females.

This always existed by is heightened right now. So transwomen are indeed in need of extra protection(at the moment) as they face slander, vilification and violence from the female population, who have been literally antagonized by the SJWs.

The vast majority of women and girls are indifferent but the percentage of infuriated females is at an all time high.

For every action, there is a reaction.

Have you been to Bangkok? For a young Thai femme boy?

I believe they call them "cherry boys".

Thanks for the new lingo...