You people that called Bush a liar what do you call

Obama didn't lie.


you can keep it if you like it


IF it meets all the criteria to still exist under the rules.


SHITTY policies were discontinued
 
Obama didn't lie.


you can keep it if you like it


IF it meets all the criteria to still exist under the rules.


SHITTY policies were discontinued

It was the lie of the year, TM. You can not dodge that reality, only ignore it.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-if-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it/

It was a catchy political pitch and a chance to calm nerves about his dramatic and complicated plan to bring historic change to America’s health insurance system.

"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," President Barack Obama said -- many times -- of his landmark new law.

But the promise was impossible to keep.

So this fall, as cancellation letters were going out to approximately 4 million Americans, the public realized Obama’s breezy assurances were wrong.
 
Bush LIED us into a protracted war he refused to end


He committed war crimes and ADIMITTED to it.



and you guys pretend a non lie from Obama carries the same weight
 
Bush LIED us into a protracted war he refused to end


He committed war crimes and ADIMITTED to it.



and you guys pretend a non lie from Obama carries the same weight



oh goody doofus!1

how is the impeachment and war crimes trial thingy going?
 
No one died from ACA.
Somehow it's different because, well, it is.

Somewhere there is a person who has died because insurance was cancelled because it didn't meet ACA requirements.

But here is what Kaiser representative told PBS...

JUDY WOODRUFF: So, who dropped the ball here? Do we know for a fact whether it was the insurance company, whether it was the government not disclosing more about the law? What — what happened?

Mary Agnes Carey of Kaiser Health News.: There was a real messaging problem on the part of the administration.

We all have heard repeatedly, if you like your plan, you can keep it, if you like your doctor, you can keep it, when the law said, plans could stay in place as long as significant changes weren’t made.
Maybe that message was deemed a little too complex to relate to people, but it created a problem and a misunderstanding."
Understanding why Americans' insurance plans are being canceled | Video | PBS NewsHour | PBS

Now as I said I don't know but I guarantee there will be deaths caused by ACA stipulations that never were understood by the totally ignorant people that had a real problem in simply understanding there NEVER was a health care crisis!
These idiots and people that believe there were 46 million "uninsured" was the Primary reason ACA was passed. There never were!
NOW I've countlessly put this up but what seems to be the problem with people like you and most people who can't comprehend this simple math?

Even Obama NOW agrees 10 million illegals won't be covered by ACA... YET he used 46 million as basis for ACA and the
Census counted these 10 million as part of the 46 million that Obama/et.al. used to lie about ACA!
Then the Census also admits that 14 million people don't know or as I KNOW 2 people that are too lazy to register with Medicaid!
These 14 million all they need is to register.. THEY ARE COvERED by Medicaid.
Finally why are 18 million people that don't NEED (under 34), spend less in health services out of pocket then their costs of employers' health plan, even though they make over $50,000 counted as "uninsured"???
it was used to sell the lie there were 46 million uninsured when the truth is subtracting the above 42 million leaves 4 million!!!
That was the BIGGEST LIE that I can't understand why people can't see these facts!
10 million of 46 million not citizens!
14 million need only register.. they qualify for Medicaid and it is the FAILURE of CMS that is managing ACA that has failed to sign them!
18 million don't want or need ... yet they were bogusly counted!

4 million truly are uninsured,need insurance not 46 million!
 
Obama didn't lie.


you can keep it if you like it


IF it meets all the criteria to still exist under the rules.


SHITTY policies were discontinued



um no they werent leftard; actually the very same "shitty" policies you had millions losing their insurance over are now allowed; your Messiah decreed so


i know loser; it's hard even for a lemming like you to keep up with your Messiah's efforts to salvage his failed law
 
Still refusing reality, heh, TM?

Thats a shocker.

do you admit Bush committed a war crime?

No. He hasn't been charged with one to my knowledge. I do agree his war of aggression was drummed up based on lies, and that actions taken could be construed as war crimes.

Obama has committed them too if we're not going off conviction but rather observation. But you refuse to admit that. So what makes you any better than your opposition?

Nothing. Your'e a hack, TM.

Go find us pictures of the children Obama killed via drone strike.
 
Bush dropped WP on falughia as a weapon.

That is a clear war crime.


He denied it until he was forced by the evidence to ADMITT IT.


the right wing congress REFUSED to do anything about it
 
U.S. official admits phosphorus used as weapon in Iraq - World - CBC News


A spokesman for the U.S. military has admitted that soldiers used white phosphorus as an "incendiary weapon" while trying to flush out insurgents in the northern Iraqi city of Fallujah last year.

"White phosphorus is a conventional munition," Lt.-Col. Barry Venable told the British Broadcasting Corporation. "It is not a chemical weapon. They are not outlawed or illegal."

He added that though used mostly to provide smokescreens and flashes of light, in the Fallujah battle, "it was used as an incendiary weapon against enemy combatants."

High-ranking U.S. officials had earlier insisted that the substance, which can burn skin to the bone, was used only to help illuminate battle scenes.

"U.S. forces do not use napalm or white phosphorus as weapons," the American ambassador to London, Robert Tuttle, wrote in a letter to the Independent newspaper.

■FROM NOV. 8, 2004: 'We will be successful,' Rumsfeld warns Fallujah insurgents


An unknown number of Iraqi women and children died of phosphorus burns during the hostilities, Italian documentary makers covering the battle for Fallujah have claimed.
 
Bush dropped WP on falughia as a weapon.

That is a clear war crime.


He denied it until he was forced by the evidence to ADMITT IT.


the right wing congress REFUSED to do anything about it

Obama dropped missiles in sovereign nations without any declaration of war and killed and maimed innocent civilians.

The left wing congress refuses to do anything about it.
 
Bush dropped WP on falughia as a weapon.

That is a clear war crime.


He denied it until he was forced by the evidence to ADMITT IT.


the right wing congress REFUSED to do anything about it



it's Fallujah you idiot; you can't even spell what you want to rant about
 
White phosphorus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Arms control status and military regulations[edit]

There are multiple international laws that could be seen to regulate white phosphorus use.[92] Article 1 of Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons defines an incendiary weapon as "any weapon or munition which is primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat, or combination thereof, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target". The same protocol prohibits the use of said incendiary weapons against civilians (already forbidden by the Geneva Conventions) or in civilian areas. The convention also defines weapons which are not to be considered to be incendiary weapons.

Examples are:

(i) Munitions which may have incidental incendiary effects, such as illuminants, tracers, smoke or signalling systems;(ii) Munitions designed to combine penetration, blast or fragmentation effects with an additional incendiary effect.
Weapons containing white phosphorus, but are not incendiary weapons, are not regulated by the above protocol.

However, the use against military targets outside civilian areas is not explicitly banned by any treaty. The convention is meant to prohibit weapons that are "dependent on the use of the toxic properties of chemicals as a method of warfare" (Article II, Definitions, 9, "Purposes not Prohibited" c.).

The convention defines a "toxic chemical" as a chemical "which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals" (CWC, II). An annex lists chemicals that fall under this definition and WP is not listed in the Schedules of chemical weapons or precursors.[93]

In an 2005 interview with RAI, Peter Kaiser, spokesman for the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (an organization overseeing the CWC and reporting directly to the UN General Assembly), questioned whether the weapon should fall under the convention's provisions:
 

Forum List

Back
Top