bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
Okay lets say that the both lied on purpose to get what they wanted.
Which lie caused the most human suffering? An illegitimate war where tens of thousands of lost their lives, were maimed or, forcing insurances companies to comply with the new rules and making some people choose a new plan? A war that shifted the balance of power in the ME to Iran, or a policy that will cost some people a little more for their insurance? A war the eroded the Good Will of the USA throughout the world or, a Health Care policy that covers previous conditions and has no benefit caps?
Did they both know they were lying or did they both believe what the were selling?
Lying is lying. Compare and contrast them all you want, the reality is both men lied. one gets a pass, one doesn't.
One was justification for an ill advised invasion an occupation of another country. The other was not justification for the ACH but a statement about a specific portion of the new law. We can't go back and give those people their lives back however, or restore the previous balance of power in the ME. We can go back and make changes to the new health care laws.
because saddam was the key to the "balance of power" in the ME
libs say the dumbest shit; and make the dumbest excuses
regime change was the official position of the clinton admin regarding iraq