jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
but we do not know if he was the aggressor. do you understand the difference?There was evidence. Eye witness in fact that could not be impeached. At the time of the shooting, we know that Martin was beating on Zimmerman.There's no evidence of that. And zimmerman, as the pursuer, could easily be called an aggressorenlighten me. what made martin's actions anything other than self defense?doesnt it get tiring
posting to a poster who comes from a position of complete ignorance on the laws
and no matter how you try the poster remains intentionally ignorant
he was the aggressor that why
We fucking know this!
we certainly do
there was a witness that said so