- Thread starter
- #201
There has ALWAYS been a massive amount against black folks.Corruption is like fraud. There can be a little or a massive amount. We have a massive amount of both.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There has ALWAYS been a massive amount against black folks.Corruption is like fraud. There can be a little or a massive amount. We have a massive amount of both.
Yea because if it was based on race the defense would have said so. The Judge even smelled that bullshit. Smfh.Again as NOTED by the Judge the reasons given for striking them were legit and were because of the juror stating a bias AGAINST the defendants or for the dead person.
The last thing we need are a bunch of dumbass hate filled Negroes protecting their soul brother. We saw how that sent an innocent man to prison with the Derek Chauvin trial, didn't we?
Bonk.None of which was the case here. They were dismissed for having a preconceived opinion without hearing one word of testimony.
Bullshit.It had nothing to do with race, ethnicity, or where they lived.
They got over on a weak ass rule that should have been changed years ago. Racist like you want it to stay in place because it gives you an unfair advantage.By allowing them on the jury knowing they already found the three guys guilty would violate their constitutional right to a fair and speedy trail with an unbiased jury. That's what the constitution says. There are no exceptions because the blacks in the jury pool all had their minds made up already. A right is a right..
Dumb Dudley history shows you are the racist and black folks have been on the receiving end of an UNJUST Justice System.Yes. Blacks are far too racist and prone to criminality to be allowed on juries these days involving white people on trial. It was also probably tough to find any that weren't felons as well.
I believe it is the blacks that are trying to rewrite history.., So please take a long walk on a short pierSorry you can't rewrite history.
No it is racist trash like you trying to rewrite history, history proves that white juries have been convicting innocent black men since this country was founded.I believe it is the blacks that are trying to rewrite history.., So please take a long walk on a short pier
I believe it is the blacks that are trying to rewrite history.., So please take a long walk on a short pier
Come on Dumb Dudley do you have anything to back that bullshit up?Some rich Democrats have been feeding them a bunch of bullshit about how the Party is going to give black people a couple million apeice and let them murder white people without facing criminal charges. SupaBadBreath here believes that stuff and has high hopes.
" Innocent black men" Is that an Oxymoron?No it is racist trash like you trying to rewrite history, history proves that white juries have been convicting innocent black men since this country was founded.
Of course; we have you here.Come on Dumb Dudley do you have anything to back that bullshit up?
That's it.No it is racist trash like you trying to rewrite history, history proves that white juries have been convicting innocent black men since this country was founded.
And YET he took no ACTION......Yea because if it was based on race the defense would have said so. The Judge even smelled that bullshit. Smfh.
That's how you get on every jury where there is a black man involved, hell that isn't anything new.That's it.
I KNOW how to get ON TO a jury. TIME TO START BEING AN ASSHOLE!!!
The next jury panel I am on for a BLACK MOTHERFUCKER, I am going to sit quietly, have no opinions, give bland answer, GET ONTO the jury...AND CONVICT ON ALL CHARGES, just because that motherfucker is black.
THERE.
How do you like that?
EVERBODY DO THE SAME!!!
He claimed there was NO ACTION he could take.And YET he took no ACTION......
That's because BY LAW the defense had reasons other then skin color you fucking racist asshole.He claimed there was NO ACTION he could take.
Blacks are incapable of making just decisions. They are, for the most part, emotional creatures.Ahmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...www.ajc.com
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
Ahmaud Arbery case in Georgia: 11 white jurors and just 1 Black man seated for trial
Sparks flew in Brunswick, Georgia, during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors based on race. In the end, just one Black man made it onto the jury of 12. All the others...www.ajc.com
Sparks flew during the final phase of jury selection in the Ahmaud Arbery case Wednesday when prosecutors accused defense attorneys of eliminating a disproportionate number of jurors because of their race.
We can see where this is going.
The fix is in.
He claimed there was NO ACTION he could take.
They got over on a weak ass rule that should have been changed years ago. Racist like you want it to stay in place because it gives you an unfair advantage.
Racist whites are more than capable of making unjust decisions, we have seen that time and time again in this country. What kind of creatures are racist whites?Blacks are incapable of making just decisions. They are, for the most part, emotional creatures.