XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,572
- 10,497
- 435
People wake up in the morning looking for things to get offended about.Cancel culture in general is idiotic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People wake up in the morning looking for things to get offended about.Cancel culture in general is idiotic
Indeed and its OK to be offended and to be offensive. Its called free speech. The whole preferred pronoun BS is idiotic.People wake up in the morning looking for things to get offended about.
That came out of nowhere. It always comes back to this topic with you.The whole preferred pronoun BS is idiotic.
It is just par for the course for leftism. You get cancelled if you use the "wrong" pronoun. LOLThat came out of nowhere. It always comes back to this topic with you.
I think you're obsessed with this issue and it just doesn't bother me or even impact me at all. We disagree on it.
Something you’re obviously passionate about. I’m not. We disagree.It is just par for the course for leftism. You get cancelled if you use the "wrong" pronoun. LOL
same as you being cancelled if you say you're anti vaccine or pro life or that America isn't systemically racist or that white privilege is a myth. Its par for the course. I believe all no violent speech should be protected.Something you’re obviously passionate about. I’m not. We disagree.
It is protected. You have the right to say it.same as you being cancelled if you say you're anti vaccine or pro life or that America isn't systemically racist or that white privilege is a myth. Its par for the course. I believe all no violent speech should be protected.
Not reallyIt is protected. You have the right to say it.
Yes really. Doesn’t mean your exempt from the consequences but your speech is still protected.Not really
Let me rephrase. Speech should exempt from most consequences unless its violent or sexual in nature.Yes really. Doesn’t mean your exempt from the consequences but your speech is still protected.
How many is irrelevant.Let me rephrase. Speech should exempt from most consequences unless its violent or sexual in nature.
I am suggesting social media doesn't ban you for stating you believe vaccines don't work for example.How many is irrelevant.
You have the right to say stupid things. People have the right to respond to the stupid things you say. Free speech goes both ways.
What exactly are you suggesting here? Be specific.
Social media sites are private companies that can implement whatever rules they want within legal boundaries. If you don’t like those rules, then just take your business elsewhere.I am suggesting social media doesn't ban you for stating you believe vaccines don't work for example.
Except even private companies have rules and regulations they have to follow but that’s another topic altogether. There is a reason you and I do not share our actual identities…Social media sites are private companies that can implement whatever rules they want within legal boundaries. If you don’t like those rules, then just take your business elsewhere.
So you’re in favor of infringing on the way a business chooses to operate because they upset you? Good to know.
The rules and regulations they follow don’t include catering to every whining crybaby who doesn’t like their rules.Except even private companies have rules and regulations they have to follow but that’s another topic altogether. There is a reason you and I do not share our actual identities…
Why don’t you share you actual name here?The rules and regulations they follow don’t include catering to every whining crybaby who doesn’t like their rules.
I prefer not to wear pants when I go to shopping. Businesses aren’t required to change their rules to satisfy my stupid preferences. (Just an example. Not meant to be taken literally.)
Businesses set their rules within legal boundaries. People choose what to consume given those rules. Seems simple enough to me.
Yet you want to restrict THEIR freedom to operate THEIR business in a way that THEY choose because THEIR rules do not align with YOUR delicate feelings.
In your example you would be able to not wear pants but I would have to. The point is they pick and choose which rules to enforce.The rules and regulations they follow don’t include catering to every whining crybaby who doesn’t like their rules.
I prefer not to wear pants when I go to shopping. Businesses aren’t required to change their rules to satisfy my stupid preferences. (Just an example. Not meant to be taken literally.)
Businesses set their rules within legal boundaries. People choose what to consume given those rules. Seems simple enough to me.
Yet you want to restrict THEIR freedom to operate THEIR business in a way that THEY choose because THEIR rules do not align with YOUR delicate feelings.
Because I don’t need to.Why don’t you share you actual name here?
Point is anonymity is necessary because of our cancel culture society.Because I don’t need to.
What are you getting at?
I can choose to be without pants but I just can’t do it when I go grocery shopping.In your example you would be able to not wear pants but I would have to. The point is they pick and choose which rules to enforce.