- Feb 22, 2004
- 82,283
- 10,140
It isn't Christian to prejudge.
No one is prejudging.
Really? It also isn't Christian to lie.
No. But then you aren't Christian are you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It isn't Christian to prejudge.
No one is prejudging.
Really? It also isn't Christian to lie.
So when Shulman was asked about this at the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing why didn't he say that instead of giving a smart ass remark about the Easter Egg hunt? First it was 118 visits now 157 and now a link claiming only 11 visits so he just forgot it was 11 visits not 118 or 157.
No one is prejudging.
Really? It also isn't Christian to lie.
No. But then you aren't Christian are you?
A hack RW cartoonist's work isn't proof, now is it.
Hack? The guy is brilliant. Unlike Nobel Peace prizes, they don't hand out Pulitzers to just anyone.
Well, then besides not being proof, rehashing the stale Chicago politics talking point wingnuts like to bring up isn't exactly Pulitzer-worthy, either.
Why exactly doesn't the corruption and scandals of this administration bother you?
Let me answer that question by posing another:
Why don't obvious partisan witch-hunts punctuated by wolf-crying and hyperbole not bother you?
The fact that there isn't one. The fact that conservative groups and candidates have been targetted by multiple agencies of the government which has been admitted.
How many scandals does this administration need to be involved in before you admit that they are corrupt?
Really? It also isn't Christian to lie.
No. But then you aren't Christian are you?
I'm an Atheist. What are you?
Odd that when asked about it, he simply wouldnt have pointed out that they were incorrect.
What evidence do we have that your site isnt just making crap up?
Let me answer that question by posing another:
Why don't obvious partisan witch-hunts punctuated by wolf-crying and hyperbole not bother you?
The fact that there isn't one. The fact that conservative groups and candidates have been targetted by multiple agencies of the government which has been admitted.
How many scandals does this administration need to be involved in before you admit that they are corrupt?
"The fact that there isn't one" is my answer right back at you. This started off as a revelation that a few people in one field office did some things which under current law you can't even say were actually illegal and it's been drawn out into something "worse than Watergate". Thankfully it doesn't appear that the rest of the country is really buying it so far.
Is this how Atlantic came up with the magic number 11? 11 visits after he was briefed that the IRS was seriously FUBAR'D?
Or the 11 times he tapped his badge?
The vast majority of Shulmans visits came before he was formally briefed on May 3, 2012, by the IRS inspector general that the agency had wrongly targeted conservative groups. He appears on the visitor logs 11 times after that briefing.
The logs also do not necessarily reflect how often Shulman visited 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
They show how often Shulman was cleared by security to come to the White House or the Old Executive Office Building next door, not whether he actually made the trip.
Because agency heads are often waived past security, the visitor logs show that Shulman only tapped his security badge to enter the grounds 11 times from 2009 to 2012.
Doug Shulman?s White House visits reflect expanded IRS role - Lauren French - POLITICO.com
Oh....yea
Stealth visits
Show us 157 visits. No, better yet.....Tell us about what a liar Obama is
Odd that when asked about it, he simply wouldnt have pointed out that they were incorrect.
What evidence do we have that your site isnt just making crap up?
Under Bush, did the IRS go after the NAACP (immediately after they criticized him by the way).
Odd that when asked about it, he simply wouldnt have pointed out that they were incorrect.
What evidence do we have that your site isnt just making crap up?
Under Bush, did the IRS go after the NAACP (immediately after they criticized him by the way).
Don't know. But why the heck do you think I would give Bush a pass for his administrations corruption? I haven't in the past. All you've demonstrated is you're a freakin hypocrite.
It isn't Christian to prejudge.
No one is prejudging.
Really? It also isn't Christian to lie.
Odd that when asked about it, he simply wouldnt have pointed out that they were incorrect.
What evidence do we have that your site isnt just making crap up?
Under Bush, did the IRS go after the NAACP (immediately after they criticized him by the way).
Don't know. But why the heck do you think I would give Bush a pass for his administrations corruption? I haven't in the past. All you've demonstrated is you're a freakin hypocrite.
Was the NAACP audited by the I.R.S. yes did they lose their tax exempt status no did they have it suspended while the investigation was ongoing no. During the Bush years was the I.R.S. searching for buzz words that indicated that groups filing for tax exempt status were liberal?
Odd that when asked about it, he simply wouldnt have pointed out that they were incorrect.
What evidence do we have that your site isnt just making crap up?
Under Bush, did the IRS go after the NAACP (immediately after they criticized him by the way).
Use this White House search log for Douglas Shulman
White House Visitor Records | The White House
It's right there 157 times....
Rightwinger you are by far the most demanding lazy-assed whiner posting.
Use this White House search log for Douglas Shulman
White House Visitor Records | The White House
It's right there 157 times....
Rightwinger you are by far the most demanding lazy-assed whiner posting.