frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 46,463
- 9,944
Well then how about the nation shut trump up as I am tired of hearing his sick persona.
Dear Tax Man the best way to shut people up
is to find some point where you can honestly say
"Yes, you're right"
When you find where you AGREE with someone
on one point or one part of a plan, then working
on that common ground will either lead to positive
constructive relations and focus, or will "shut people
up or down" if they are not serious and you are calling them
on it with "reverse psychology" by "giving them what they want."
Just do this SINCERELY and find where you REALLY agree on something, and it works.
EX: finding out that Green progressive Sanders supporters who believe
in worker owned cooperatives ACTUALLY WOULD AGREE with
conservative like Sean Hannity arguing for health care coops.
And Obama and Ben Carson BOTH AGREE That microlending
and business training/education would be the more effective
sustainable way to end dependence on welfare handouts
and promote self-reliance and liberation from poverty and economic problems.
If you stick with points of AGREEMENT again
either people are SERIOUS and will WORK on common solutions
or they will STFU if they are just complaining and don't care to follow up on any real solutions
to the problems they just want to blame on someone else.
Yes, you have $10 million and I want $10 million, so let's come to a compromise, you give me half of what you have, $5 million and I'll give you half of what I have $0 and everyone's happy.
Well frigidweirdo close
but to get me to agree equally:
let's both agree to raise 10 million for good causes,
such as let's raise 10 million to set up conflict resolution between
parties to resolve political beliefs per issue.
Then you and I both raise 5 million each.
If we set a goal or make a bet or contest
such as: whoever raises 5 million first, or whoever wins the bet,
that person's 5 million goes to the other person's cause.
I offered to make bets such as
betting that the factor of "forgiveness" can be proven as
the key to spiritual healing methods that can be demonstrated as natural, voluntary,
safe and effective by medical research
and that by applying this to conflict resolution,
theists and nontheists can form an agreement
that "Christ Jesus" means "restorative justice" or "peace and justice"
or "equal justice under law" to stop fighting over secular vs religious approaches to justice.
Or that we can reach an agreement between parties
to recognize equal "political beliefs" and quit fighting
over beliefs about health care, gun and voting rights, marriage etc
by treating these as beliefs and letting party members invest
their taxes into the progrms of their choice instead of imposing or interfering with each other.
FW since you seem quite capable of facilitating and communicating
points of agreement vs disagreement
would you liek to try setting up a 10 million dollar bet or challenge?
Let's pick a goal, I will challenge you,
and we can both try raising 5 million each!
Then depending what the bet or goal is, sure
I will agree to bet you where the money could
go all to your fund or all to mine, whoever wins, as long as it
is set up where everyone is going to win anyway, I see no problem
making it a friendly fun bet or challenge to promote a good cause!
Thanks FW
But that's not really what you're saying, is it? You have an analogy that doesn't work with what you actually expect of people.
What analogy are you saying doesn't work? frigidweirdo
What I expect of people is to follow their own beliefs in finding solutions that
fit their agenda and what they will agree to invest in as solving their problems.
What are you saying doesn't work toward that goal?
Your analogy that we raise cash and give it to charity. This has nothing to do with my analogy and nothing to do with what you were talking about either.