200 million dead and Obama sez there's no difference between capitalism and communism

Obama is a Marxist, pure and simple, that modern Marxism realizes they must take money from the Capitalists is not proof their ideology is not Marxism. If you read what the modern Marxist states, they believe they need a World wide revolution to bring Marxism into full main stream power.

Name anything that is uniquely Marxist that Obama supports.
if you don't thnk obama wants to disarm gun owners you're in a alternative universe.
When he used the IRS to subvert tea party groups.
When criticizes bush policies, and then overthrows Lybia is that a right or left tactic?
Uses lies and intimidation to push his agenda's.
You're a liar; your thread premise is a lie, you're devoid of credibility, like most others on the right.
 
Obama is a Marxist, pure and simple, that modern Marxism realizes they must take money from the Capitalists is not proof their ideology is not Marxism. If you read what the modern Marxist states, they believe they need a World wide revolution to bring Marxism into full main stream power.

Name anything that is uniquely Marxist that Obama supports.
if you don't thnk obama wants to disarm gun owners you're in a alternative universe.
When he used the IRS to subvert tea party groups.
When criticizes bush policies, and then overthrows Lybia is that a right or left tactic?
Uses lies and intimidation to push his agenda's.
You're a liar; your thread premise is a lie, you're devoid of credibility, like most others on the right.
I'm thinking of making a video Clayton; then you can blame the video

Obama on capitalism vs. communism: ‘Just choose from what works’
 
Last edited:
Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.


Wrong....deaths at the hands of socialists are not war dead..they are people murdered for simply resisting or being in the way of communist goals....

When people quote a 200,000,000 figure, that includes WWII, and is a high estimate.
 
.
I think Obama should go to Venezuela next. Although, he should probably bring his own toilet paper.
 
You're trying to make a case. People are telling you that your source is rubbish. Your response is to tell others to do you work for you.
Ok, I'll act stupid then we'll be on the same level.

Oh good, more personal insults.

You must be talking about bulldog

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?
So attacking sources isn't the work of a weak mind hey


If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;



Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
You're trying to make a case. People are telling you that your source is rubbish. Your response is to tell others to do you work for you.
Ok, I'll act stupid then we'll be on the same level.

Oh good, more personal insults.

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?


If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;


Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Moa, Lenin, Pot, Stalin for the most part; had nothing to do with world war 2.


Regardless, the differences between colonial capitalism and communism aren't very significant, because the methods they employed were not much different. You look at corporate central planning in India, Africa, or Indochina, and difference is hard to distinguish from the "left-wing" systems that replaced them.

The plain fact is that any system in which all to political and economic power rests in the same few hands, will result in the same degree of tyranny for the average person, regardless of what window dressing is put on it.


Capitalism and communism are light years apart.

You haven't even figured out how to reply to a post correctly. Do you really expect anyone to take anything you say seriously when you can't even do that right?

DERP, DERP, DERP...
 
Obama is a Marxist, pure and simple, that modern Marxism realizes they must take money from the Capitalists is not proof their ideology is not Marxism. If you read what the modern Marxist states, they believe they need a World wide revolution to bring Marxism into full main stream power.

Name anything that is uniquely Marxist that Obama supports.
if you don't thnk obama wants to disarm gun owners you're in a alternative universe.
When he used the IRS to subvert tea party groups.
When criticizes bush policies, and then overthrows Lybia is that a right or left tactic?
Uses lies and intimidation to push his agenda's.
You're a liar; your thread premise is a lie, you're devoid of credibility, like most others on the right.

Whadda generalization

BTW:
Here are 1,187 well sourced examples of Obama’s lying, lawbreaking, corruption, cronyism, hypocrisy, waste, etc.
 
Ok, I'll act stupid then we'll be on the same level.

Oh good, more personal insults.

You must be talking about bulldog

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?
So attacking sources isn't the work of a weak mind hey


If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;



Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Ok, I'll act stupid then we'll be on the same level.

Oh good, more personal insults.

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?


If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;


Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Moa, Lenin, Pot, Stalin for the most part; had nothing to do with world war 2.


Regardless, the differences between colonial capitalism and communism aren't very significant, because the methods they employed were not much different. You look at corporate central planning in India, Africa, or Indochina, and difference is hard to distinguish from the "left-wing" systems that replaced them.

The plain fact is that any system in which all to political and economic power rests in the same few hands, will result in the same degree of tyranny for the average person, regardless of what window dressing is put on it.


Capitalism and communism are light years apart.

You haven't even figured out how to reply to a post correctly. Do you really expect anyone to take anything you say seriously when you can't even do that right?

DERP, DERP, DERP...

"Capitalism and Communism", are light years apart, we have the last Century that attests to that fact, do you think differently?
 
Oh good, more personal insults.

You must be talking about bulldog

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?
So attacking sources isn't the work of a weak mind hey
If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;



Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Oh good, more personal insults.

Why don't you try and convince people that your point is correct, rather than head of to insults at the first sign of someone pointing something out that isn't correct?
If you think Obama is a Communism lover, or even a "Progressive" you haven't" been paying attention. He dropped the leftie masquerade 2 min. after winning his first term.
Even before he was elected he set a record for contributions from Wall St. and some of the baddest of the bad actors in the credit default swindles that cost the American taxpayers 10's of $billions.

businessinsider.com
said;

"Of the 244 Obama campaign "bundlers," 80 work in finance, insurance, and real estate. Politico's Byron Tau and Ben Smith report today that many of the Obama bundlers have official business before the U.S. government".

One year into his Presidency, which he won in part with promises of reining in Wall St. greed globalresearch.ca said;

"What’s taken place in the year since Obama won the presidency has turned out to be one of the most dramatic political about-faces in our history."

He got rid of his progressive leaning pre-election advisors(who must have helped him with a progressive sounding vocabulary) and packed his new administration in the;

"key economic positions in his White House, the very people who caused the crisis in the first place. This new team of bubble-fattened ex-bankers and laissez-faire intellectuals then proceeded to sell us all out, instituting a massive, trickle-up bailout and systematically gutting regulatory reform from the inside".

I think that's a bit exaggerated but even a conservative , Rep. Cliff Stearns, Republican from Florida, scolded him for his one percenter policies, saying;
“You can’t expect these people to do anything other than protect Wall Street,”

To put it in the starkest terms, his continuation of the loosy-goosey credit habits of the financial industry, encouraged by his first address to Congress may have set the game up for the "big one", no way the American people with their new-found rage at the greed obsessed 1%ers who have continued to suck the cream out of the American economy, are going to allow another bailout. The house of cards may really fall apart the next time. Some of the real econo-crazies, the gold hoarders and the like are predicting econogeddon, people heading to the hills to eat berries and raiding chicken coop type scenarios. He started the panic early with that first address, stressing;

"the importance of getting Americans to borrow like crazy again. “Credit is the lifeblood of the economy,” he declared, pledging “the full force of the federal government to ensure that the major banks that Americans depend on have enough confidence and enough money."

Oh yeah, those nutbar Obama haters as usual got it all wrong and as usual stuck with their tactics of selective and out-of-context quotes. Obama spent the last half of that speech in Argentina praising market economies. The nutbars are so blinded by hate they can't see the truth. Here's the rest of what he said;


Also people use plain figures, but then China (world's most populous country) and Russia (world's largest country) were part of this, meaning a lot of people were under Communism. Also their figure might include ALL DEATHS in WW2, simply because Russia played a part, or all deaths caused by war in the Russian/German sphere, as if Russia being invaded by German was the fault of the Communists.
Moa, Lenin, Pot, Stalin for the most part; had nothing to do with world war 2.


Regardless, the differences between colonial capitalism and communism aren't very significant, because the methods they employed were not much different. You look at corporate central planning in India, Africa, or Indochina, and difference is hard to distinguish from the "left-wing" systems that replaced them.

The plain fact is that any system in which all to political and economic power rests in the same few hands, will result in the same degree of tyranny for the average person, regardless of what window dressing is put on it.


Capitalism and communism are light years apart.

You haven't even figured out how to reply to a post correctly. Do you really expect anyone to take anything you say seriously when you can't even do that right?

DERP, DERP, DERP...

"Capitalism and Communism", are light years apart, we have the last Century that attests to that fact, do you think differently?

We need to quit fighting the philosophies of the KKK and accept the good ideas that they have.
 


You got a legitimate source for your silly little story?
There;s plenty of sources out there But you have a to silly of little brain to look them up

You're trying to make a case. People are telling you that your source is rubbish. Your response is to tell others to do you work for you.

If you don't like the source, produce something that counters the source. Yeah, you're going to have to do that yourself.

See, those of us with functioning neocortexes check our facts in order to keep from making fools of ourselves. All it shows when you rely on an unsupported source, is that you are not able to think for yourself--that you are able to be spoon-fed nonsense, so that your amygdala responds.

Then go check your facts. You attacking the source do3ant equate to fact.
 
Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Since "colonial capitalism" or communism ever existed, neither ever killed anybody. BTW, capitalism is an economic system, communism is a political system.
 
Colonial capitalism and communism both killed tens of millions of people. The precise numbers are a source of considerable dispute.

Since "colonial capitalism" or communism ever existed, neither ever killed anybody. BTW, capitalism is an economic system, communism is a political system.
Are you saying Communism never existed, than you state Communism was a political system?
 
Are you saying Communism never existed, than you state Communism was a political system?

Pure communism, no. The Chinese came the closest but still did free-market capitalism through Hong Kong to acquire U.S. dollars and keep their currency afloat. What the Asians and Ivans had through the 20th century was socialism.
 
Directly from that crackpot link, quoting President Obama:

"...you should be practical and just choose from what works. You don’t have to worry about whether it really fits into socialist theory or capitalist theory. You should just decide what works.”

Now who wants to take issue with that statement? Debate me.


Good luck trying to get honest debate from people like these. They interpret events through a subjective filter derived from talk radio's vicious hatred of Obama, lack of fundamental knowledge of true history, FOX news type "fact's"(that's a shorthand I think you understand). It's like the original flaws in the Hubble's mirrors, the image output was distorted and useless no matter the technological miracles and cost of the craft itself. You'd be debating an opponent suffering from the GIGO syndrome. I've tried it hundreds of times, it's like pounding your head against the wall, you finally decide it's not going to cure your headache.

And I have a different take
the marriage between capitalism and communism has been tried. It's called fascism.

I know you have "a different take". I tried to give NYC a description of it. He'll probably figure out what I mean, you never will.

the man is evil and speaks out of both sides of his ass. I wouldn't let my children near him to listen to his spew. He goes over to lecture the children in other countries. who made him King of the world.

As for you. You're just a plain old garden variety lying racist puke, I wouldn't waste three seconds trying to have a conversation with a slithering forked-tongued snaky witch. The whole board is demeaned by this infection, of too many of your ilk.
Oh Brother. Obama being afro american gives you a convenient fall back for criticism doesn't it?
btw: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/world/europe/trump-finds-new-city-to-insult-brussels.html

Jan 27 of this year.
 
As I posted last week, with link (want it? Go look it up...), Obama - the leader of the greatest country in the free world - declared 'Communism, Socialism....just pick one that works'.

Yeah, Communism, Socialism, Sharia Law....it's all good, man. Just pick one.

This moron can NOT leave office soon enough!
 
You got a legitimate source for your silly little story?
There;s plenty of sources out there But you have a to silly of little brain to look them up

You're trying to make a case. People are telling you that your source is rubbish. Your response is to tell others to do you work for you.

If you don't like the source, produce something that counters the source. Yeah, you're going to have to do that yourself.

See, those of us with functioning neocortexes check our facts in order to keep from making fools of ourselves. All it shows when you rely on an unsupported source, is that you are not able to think for yourself--that you are able to be spoon-fed nonsense, so that your amygdala responds.

Then go check your facts. You attacking the source do3ant equate to fact.


Source does not cite facts, either, if you care to read it.

 

Forum List

Back
Top