2009 Budget deficit to be largest ever

Cheap prescription drugs creating new brand of US tourist in Canada, Mexico
Milan Korcok
Milan Korcok is a Canadian journalist based in Florida.

By the busload, thousands of American seniors are crossing over into Canada and Mexico to stock up on the one valuable commodity they can't seem to find at home - affordable prescription drugs.

Armed with sturdy American greenbacks and lured by price differentials that save some of them thousands of dollars a year, the list of treks being made by these day trippers is growing: from Maine to Quebec and New Brunswick, from the state of Washington to Calgary or Vancouver, from Arizona, Texas and California to Mexico.

According to US Senator Slade Gorton of Washington, the stomach acid medication omeprazole costs US$129 for a 30-pill order in his state, but only US$53 in Canada. The antihyperglycemic agent metformin costs $52 in the US, but only $12 in Canada, while conjugated estrogens cost $26 in Washington and $7 in Calgary. Overall, the survey found that for the 10 most commonly prescribed drugs, average prices were 64% lower in Canada than in Washington state. (All prices provided are in US dollars and are based on the lowest dosage available for each drug.) To American seniors, many of whom have health plans (including Medicare) that do not cover prescription drugs, these savings could make a huge difference.

The plight of these pharmaceutical nomads has clearly inflamed the passions of federal and state politicians during this election season, particularly because the issue of expanding prescription drug benefits to 38 million Medicare beneficiaries and 44 million uninsured Americans has zoomed to the top of the political agenda. Everybody, it seems, is looking for a solution to the high cost of prescription drugs. But forcing seniors to hop the border to Canada or Mexico to fill shopping bags with drugs, many of which were manufactured in the US, is not a politically appealing one.

Industry representatives generally attribute lower drug prices in foreign countries to consumer drug price controls, such as those provided by Canada's Patented Medicines Prices Review Board. Drug manufacturers and their US wholesalers have to sell at a great discount if they want to make their products available abroad. Even in the US, large bulk buyers of drugs like HMOs, insurance companies and the Veterans Administration get huge discounts for their volume purchases. However, the folks who buy retail are out of luck.

http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/162/13/1869
 
Last edited:
Cheap prescription drugs creating new brand of US tourist in Canada, Mexico
Milan Korcok
Milan Korcok is a Canadian journalist based in Florida.

By the busload, thousands of American seniors are crossing over into Canada and Mexico to stock up on the one valuable commodity they can't seem to find at home - affordable prescription drugs.

Armed with sturdy American greenbacks and lured by price differentials that save some of them thousands of dollars a year, the list of treks being made by these day trippers is growing: from Maine to Quebec and New Brunswick, from the state of Washington to Calgary or Vancouver, from Arizona, Texas and California to Mexico.

According to US Senator Slade Gorton of Washington, the stomach acid medication omeprazole costs US$129 for a 30-pill order in his state, but only US$53 in Canada. The antihyperglycemic agent metformin costs $52 in the US, but only $12 in Canada, while conjugated estrogens cost $26 in Washington and $7 in Calgary. Overall, the survey found that for the 10 most commonly prescribed drugs, average prices were 64% lower in Canada than in Washington state. (All prices provided are in US dollars and are based on the lowest dosage available for each drug.) To American seniors, many of whom have health plans (including Medicare) that do not cover prescription drugs, these savings could make a huge difference.

The plight of these pharmaceutical nomads has clearly inflamed the passions of federal and state politicians during this election season, particularly because the issue of expanding prescription drug benefits to 38 million Medicare beneficiaries and 44 million uninsured Americans has zoomed to the top of the political agenda. Everybody, it seems, is looking for a solution to the high cost of prescription drugs. But forcing seniors to hop the border to Canada or Mexico to fill shopping bags with drugs, many of which were manufactured in the US, is not a politically appealing one.

Industry representatives generally attribute lower drug prices in foreign countries to consumer drug price controls, such as those provided by Canada's Patented Medicines Prices Review Board. Drug manufacturers and their US wholesalers have to sell at a great discount if they want to make their products available abroad. Even in the US, large bulk buyers of drugs like HMOs, insurance companies and the Veterans Administration get huge discounts for their volume purchases. However, the folks who buy retail are out of luck.

Cheap prescription drugs creating new brand of US tourist in Canada, Mexico -- Korcok 162 (13): 1869 -- Canadian Medical Association Journal

Just goes to prove that we should start charging the rest of the world for our R&D...
 
Yes, he DID have a BUDGET surplus Brian.....and yess SS surplus funds were in the budget, but this IS BY LAW and according to LAW.....

it does suck that SS and the federal discretionary spending are included together in one single budget....it does mask our TRUE deficits and makes our gvt appear better than they are and hides their over spending amounts, unless you are aware of how the budget really works and most people are not aware, imho.

What i differ with you on Brian is that Clinton did balance the BUDGET and did have a BUDGET surplus his later years in office WITH the help of the Republican majority congress

care
Sorry, this is not a budget surplus by any reasonable accounting standard.

The Government using current Social Security surplus funds to offset liabilities in the budget is not something specified by Law. It is a chosen method of accounting (cash flow accounting). It is accounting sleight of hand. Accrual accounting, which governs public companies, would have reported deficits during every year Clinton was in office. It would have reported approximately a $930 billion deficit last year, not including Medicare. Under the accrual method, long-term liabilities must be recognized when they are incurred and can be controlled. The cash-flow method of accounting used by the government to report on the Federal Budget is a farce. And as long as the citizens continue to swallow this BS, our fiscal problems will not be solved. It hides the fiscal irresponsibility of our elected leaders.

Just because the government choses to report something a certain way (and circumvent generally accepted principles of accounting), does not make it reality. Sorry.

How do you think the Comptroller General of the US, David Walker, views this farsical reporting of the budget?

Brian
 
Last edited:
How do you think the Comptroller General of the US, David Walker, views this farsical reporting of the budget?

Brian

Well, let's see. He's been going public with his discontent now for MONTHS.

Here's a 60 minutes piece from earlier this year:

[youtube]OS2fI2p9iVs[/youtube]
 
Well, let's see. He's been going public with his discontent now for MONTHS.

Here's a 60 minutes piece from earlier this year:

[youtube]OS2fI2p9iVs[/youtube]

It's scary stuff if you ask me....
But he does tend to agree with you and I that the fiscal irresponsibility of the government is the greatest threat to our country.
 
It's scary stuff if you ask me....
But he does tend to agree with you and I that the fiscal irresponsibility of the government is the greatest threat to our country.

And who were the most fiscally irresponsible presidents?

Reagan and Bush....

So, who has done more damage to America than anyone?

Reagan and Bush....

ReaganBushDebt.org
 
And who were the most fiscally irresponsible presidents?

Reagan and Bush....

ReaganBushDebt.org

So, who has done more damage to America than anyone?

Reagan and Bush....

Who instilled the programs to begin with? Even further proof that your assertions that the President controls spending is nothing more than a myth.
 
Ah yes, doctors expect to be well compensated for saving people's lives, what the hell is wrong with them? I wonder what would happen to the number of people aspiring to be doctors if the government restricted the amount of pay they were compensated?

There'd be less of them.

I'm not really convinced that the mortality/morbidty statistics would get much worse, though.

I am no longer convinced that our medical establishment is actually very healthful to the population, or that another dollar going into the system actually buys another dollar's worth of health care outcomes coming out of the investment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top