2012 Presidential Debate - Third and Final Debate

And The Winner Is..

  • "Mitt Romneh won, yuo only think it was Obummer becuase deh moderater was bias!"

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    64
Romney is not stating facts.

Obama's foreign policy record is kick-ass. We are safer, more respected and more influential now than we were 4 years ago.
 
He said 1917




U.S.Navy Active Ship Force Levels, 1917-1923

DATE 4/6/17 11/11/18 7/1/19 7/1/20 7/1/21 7/1/22 7/1/23
BATTLESHIP 37 39 36 26 22 19 18
MONITORS, COASTAL 7 7 5 1 2@ - -
CARRIERS, FLEET - - - - - - -
CARRIERS, ESCORT - - - - - - -
CRUISERS 33 31 28 27 10 12 13
DESTROYERS 66 110 161 189 68 (208rc ) 103 103
FRIGATES 17 17 - - - - -
SUBMARINES 44 80 91 58 69 (11rc) 82 (7rc) 69 (5rc)
MINE WARFARE - 53 62 48 50 (8rc) 36 38
PATROL 42 350 65 45 59 (1rc) 43 41
AUXILIARY 96 87 304 173 104 83 82
SURFACE WARSHIPS 160 204 230 243 102 134 134
TOTAL ACTIVE 342 774 752 567 384 (228rc) 379 (7rc) 365 (5rc)


US Ship Force Levels


Obama is wrong, ships occupy their physical space and command the horizon around them ........less ships less space covered, Obama sounded like an ass.

LOL

Monitors? They were from the Civil War

What a Douchebag. One carrier wipes out that whole fleet

Shows what numbers are worth

God you're ignorant, seriously, read what I wrote and Romney was right the fleet is as small, sux huh?

You are a moron

Those ships ran on COAL

They have no range, no defense and no lethality

For Romney to compare their numbers to todays fleet is idiocy. Forget one Aircraft carrier. One Destroyer could wipe out that fleet of rust buckets
 
Obama is continually having to educate, Romney looks like he has a migraine.
 
No actually it's 100% correct. In WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, we had to pound the shoreline with battleships and cruisers. Today we fire missiles from aircraft and destroyers. Hence you need fewer ships and the battle ships are now museums.

Evolution.

Obama kicked Romney's ass.

His snarky attitude is most definitely a turn off...it hasn't worked for him in the past, and it certainly won't work for him in this debate.

You're drunk.

Better drive home, real fast, swerving a lot....

Awww sweetie, I hit a nerve and now you're coming unhinged.:lol:
 
Romney is not stating facts.

Obama's foreign policy record is kick-ass. We are safer, more respected and more influential now than we were 4 years ago.

yeah destroying our alliances really make us safer.

There is a reason most of the dictators in the world are supporting Obama.
 
Obama is obfuscating. Mitt is coming across with facts, strategy and policy..every time he pounds Obama with facts, Obama comes up with ridiculous posturing and lies.

The O is toast. Americans are done with him.

rose_colored_glasses.jpg
 
No, the sanctions have been submarined by 22 exemptions.






In Istanbul Tuesday, U.S. and Iranian nuclear negotiators meet for the fourth time in four months, with the classic diplomatic assignment of talking about whether to hold future talks. They'll likely agree to do so, but the real news happened under the radar last week: Though economic sanctions still haven't slowed or stopped Iran's nuclear drive, the Obama Administration has decided to make them even weaker. The Iran sanctions regime is looking like the U.S. tax code—filled with loopholes.

It's so weak, in fact, that all 20 of Iran's major trading partners are now exempt from them. We've arrived at a kind of voodoo version of sanctions. They look real, insofar as Congress forced them into a bill President Obama had to sign in December. The Administration has spoken incantations about their powers. But if you're a big oil importer in China, India or 18 other major economies, the sanctions are mostly smoke.

This is possible because, thanks to lobbying by the Obama Administration, the sanctions law contained several loopholes you could drive a warhead through. One provided that if a country "significantly reduced" its oil imports from Iran, the State Department could exempt it from sanctions for a renewable period of six months. Naturally, the definition of a significant reduction was left to the Administration's discretion.

As of last week, we know that its definition is trifling: India earned a free pass after merely pledging to cut its Iran imports by 11%, and Japan earned one after cutting 22% of its Iranian business in 2011. Then there's China, the Islamic Republic's biggest customer, which is now exempt after cutting Iran imports by 25% between January and May (measured year-over-year).

More at-
The Wall Street Journal: Obama's Iran Loopholes - WSJ.com
 
No actually it's 100% correct. In WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, we had to pound the shoreline with battleships and cruisers. Today we fire missiles from aircraft and destroyers. Hence you need fewer ships and the battle ships are now museums.

Evolution.

Obama kicked Romney's ass.

His snarky attitude is most definitely a turn off...it hasn't worked for him in the past, and it certainly won't work for him in this debate.

Just think of how irritating it must be for POTUS, the leader of the free world to have to go though this ridiculous spectacle with this clown, Romney.

Mitt doesn't know anything about FP and he's just reciting talking points.

He thinks we need more ships for Christ sakes. More horses!! My Cayman island account for a horse!!

Settle down, little man...would cookies and milk help make it better??:D
 

Forum List

Back
Top