2012 Presidential Debate - Third and Final Debate

And The Winner Is..

  • "Mitt Romneh won, yuo only think it was Obummer becuase deh moderater was bias!"

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    64
Dumb move by Romney to bring up "apology tour." Lowest focus group numbers so far.
 
And The Winner Is.. There is no winner and the American people are the losers in this debate.
This debate is different because they are arguing over how they would do exactly the same things.
These two clowns are more concerned about Israel and Iran than they are about the United States.
 
Last edited:
Wish he would stop acting like that.

It's a turn off to everyone except for his hungry base.

No actually it's 100% correct. In WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, we had to pound the shoreline with battleships and cruisers. Today we fire missiles from aircraft and destroyers. Hence you need fewer ships and the battle ships are now museums.

Evolution.

Obama kicked Romney's ass.

His snarky attitude is most definitely a turn off...it hasn't worked for him in the past, and it certainly won't work for him in this debate.
 
Fuck Obama... explaining what a carrier is and what a submarine does.\

What an asshole!!

Oh he's clearly going to carry the vote of our service people and veterans.:eusa_whistle:

Obama was condescending, but Romney deserved such with saying we have less ships since WWI and planes since WWII. Those are ignorant statements that ignore modern warefare as Obama astutely pointed out.

Commander in Chief Romney? No way....

The Governor has been running for office for nearly 10 years. A junior grade lieutenant on the USS Seabiscuit could have put the Governor in his place on that one.
 
I'm loving this.

Obama is explaining how and why his policies work.

And Fox will spin the hell out of this, but independents are hearing it.
 
Obama seems so unconvincing ... so weak ... so bleeding heart....

pathetic.
 
Romney thinks our Navy is weaker than 1916?

He said 1917




U.S.Navy Active Ship Force Levels, 1917-1923

DATE 4/6/17 11/11/18 7/1/19 7/1/20 7/1/21 7/1/22 7/1/23
BATTLESHIP 37 39 36 26 22 19 18
MONITORS, COASTAL 7 7 5 1 2@ - -
CARRIERS, FLEET - - - - - - -
CARRIERS, ESCORT - - - - - - -
CRUISERS 33 31 28 27 10 12 13
DESTROYERS 66 110 161 189 68 (208rc ) 103 103
FRIGATES 17 17 - - - - -
SUBMARINES 44 80 91 58 69 (11rc) 82 (7rc) 69 (5rc)
MINE WARFARE - 53 62 48 50 (8rc) 36 38
PATROL 42 350 65 45 59 (1rc) 43 41
AUXILIARY 96 87 304 173 104 83 82
SURFACE WARSHIPS 160 204 230 243 102 134 134
TOTAL ACTIVE 342 774 752 567 384 (228rc) 379 (7rc) 365 (5rc)


US Ship Force Levels


Obama is wrong, ships occupy their physical space and command the horizon around them ........less ships less space covered, Obama sounded like an ass.

LOL

Monitors? They were from the Civil War

What a Douchebag. One carrier wipes out that whole fleet

Shows what numbers are worth

God you're ignorant, seriously, read what I wrote and Romney was right the fleet is as small, sux huh?
 
It's a turn off to everyone except for his hungry base.

No actually it's 100% correct. In WWII, Korea, and Vietnam, we had to pound the shoreline with battleships and cruisers. Today we fire missiles from aircraft and destroyers. Hence you need fewer ships and the battle ships are now museums.

Evolution.

Obama kicked Romney's ass.

His snarky attitude is most definitely a turn off...it hasn't worked for him in the past, and it certainly won't work for him in this debate.

He's also mastering the facts as well. You can be somewhat snarky when your opponent is literally ignorant of what the capabilities of the modern navy are in a foreign policy debate.
 
Romney just tried to crowbar in that dictator comment.

Obama is now demonstrating what a leader does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top