Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ummm, I went back and got the chart you deleted. Hack.
Yeah, I started a post, decided to reply to someone else's post instead and my original post was still in there that contained the chart. After I posted I realized what I did and removed it, what difference does it make? It's still from the epa.
After I posted I realized what I did and removed it,
Yeah, I noticed you removed the chart that made your study look silly.
what difference does it make?
It shows you're dishonest.
It's still from the epa.
I know, the EPA admits that yields have soared, even with "climate change".
No, the chart from the epa demonstrates climate change has an impact on our crops according to the epa. Doesn't show any dishonesty on my part.
How does a 150% increase in crop production demonstrate the climate change reduces crop production?
You'd have to read the epa article, it discusses it in depth, link already provided.
Still waiting on a trusted source who disputes climate change from you silly fuckers and you can't provide one.
Farmers are having record year crop productions, which doesn't fit with your bull shit either.What's the point of debating this anymore? The right does not accept the evidence.
Why wouldn't they? At least in the U.S. where we aren't feeling the affects of climate change quite as severely as other parts of the world. But, why wait?
https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/66560/WP119_FINAL.pdf
According to the most recent IPCC report, changes in climates over the last 30 years
have already reduced global agricultural production in the range 1-5 % per decade
globally, with particularly negative effects for tropical cereal crops such as maize and
rice (Porter et al., 2014). In addition, there is now mounting evidence suggesting that
even at low (+2 ºC) levels of warming, agricultural productivity is likely to decline
across the globe, but particularly across tropical areas (Challinor et al., 2014). This
Working Paper provides an overview of projected climate change impacts on crop
production and suitability across Africa, using a combination of literature review,
models and new data analysis
I believe that's from 2013, we already know that crop productions are being threatened and have already been affected by climate change. But, you wouldn't bother to look into it anyway, so what is the point of having this debate with you when one of your boneheaded ideas is to bring the bible into it that you did in another post.
So, do you really believe that crap study? Just figuring the low estimate of 1% per decade says that we are now producing three percent less than we otherwise would be. When i look at the food production rates i see no slow down I see more food than ever. In fact there is so much food out there that we can afford to waste 1.3 BILLION tons of food every year. That's lost, or allowed to rot, or simply thrown down the drain to keep prices up.
There is ZERO real evidence to support that assertion.
Food Waste: The Facts
Yeah, I started a post, decided to reply to someone else's post instead and my original post was still in there that contained the chart. After I posted I realized what I did and removed it, what difference does it make? It's still from the epa.
After I posted I realized what I did and removed it,
Yeah, I noticed you removed the chart that made your study look silly.
what difference does it make?
It shows you're dishonest.
It's still from the epa.
I know, the EPA admits that yields have soared, even with "climate change".
No, the chart from the epa demonstrates climate change has an impact on our crops according to the epa. Doesn't show any dishonesty on my part.
How does a 150% increase in crop production demonstrate the climate change reduces crop production?
You'd have to read the epa article, it discusses it in depth, link already provided.
Still waiting on a trusted source who disputes climate change from you silly fuckers and you can't provide one.
Still waiting on a scientific source from you that claims man is responsible for anything that is actually based on empirical data and has no computer derived science fiction as it's primary source.
Good luck with that. And BTW, in Science that's how it's done. YOU make the claim, YOU support the claim.
Farmers are having record year crop productions, which doesn't fit with your bull shit either.What's the point of debating this anymore? The right does not accept the evidence.
Why wouldn't they? At least in the U.S. where we aren't feeling the affects of climate change quite as severely as other parts of the world. But, why wait?
https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/66560/WP119_FINAL.pdf
According to the most recent IPCC report, changes in climates over the last 30 years
have already reduced global agricultural production in the range 1-5 % per decade
globally, with particularly negative effects for tropical cereal crops such as maize and
rice (Porter et al., 2014). In addition, there is now mounting evidence suggesting that
even at low (+2 ºC) levels of warming, agricultural productivity is likely to decline
across the globe, but particularly across tropical areas (Challinor et al., 2014). This
Working Paper provides an overview of projected climate change impacts on crop
production and suitability across Africa, using a combination of literature review,
models and new data analysis
I believe that's from 2013, we already know that crop productions are being threatened and have already been affected by climate change. But, you wouldn't bother to look into it anyway, so what is the point of having this debate with you when one of your boneheaded ideas is to bring the bible into it that you did in another post.
So, do you really believe that crap study? Just figuring the low estimate of 1% per decade says that we are now producing three percent less than we otherwise would be. When i look at the food production rates i see no slow down I see more food than ever. In fact there is so much food out there that we can afford to waste 1.3 BILLION tons of food every year. That's lost, or allowed to rot, or simply thrown down the drain to keep prices up.
There is ZERO real evidence to support that assertion.
Food Waste: The Facts
You're using an organization whose goal is to fight hunger to make the point that there is plenty of food in the world. The rest of your post doesn't address anything.
Farmers are having record year crop productions, which doesn't fit with your bull shit either.What's the point of debating this anymore? The right does not accept the evidence.
Why wouldn't they? At least in the U.S. where we aren't feeling the affects of climate change quite as severely as other parts of the world. But, why wait?
https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/66560/WP119_FINAL.pdf
According to the most recent IPCC report, changes in climates over the last 30 years
have already reduced global agricultural production in the range 1-5 % per decade
globally, with particularly negative effects for tropical cereal crops such as maize and
rice (Porter et al., 2014). In addition, there is now mounting evidence suggesting that
even at low (+2 ºC) levels of warming, agricultural productivity is likely to decline
across the globe, but particularly across tropical areas (Challinor et al., 2014). This
Working Paper provides an overview of projected climate change impacts on crop
production and suitability across Africa, using a combination of literature review,
models and new data analysis
I believe that's from 2013, we already know that crop productions are being threatened and have already been affected by climate change. But, you wouldn't bother to look into it anyway, so what is the point of having this debate with you when one of your boneheaded ideas is to bring the bible into it that you did in another post.
So, do you really believe that crap study? Just figuring the low estimate of 1% per decade says that we are now producing three percent less than we otherwise would be. When i look at the food production rates i see no slow down I see more food than ever. In fact there is so much food out there that we can afford to waste 1.3 BILLION tons of food every year. That's lost, or allowed to rot, or simply thrown down the drain to keep prices up.
There is ZERO real evidence to support that assertion.
Food Waste: The Facts
You're using an organization whose goal is to fight hunger to make the point that there is plenty of food in the world. The rest of your post doesn't address anything.
Your EPA chart proves there is plenty of food in the world.
After I posted I realized what I did and removed it,
Yeah, I noticed you removed the chart that made your study look silly.
what difference does it make?
It shows you're dishonest.
It's still from the epa.
I know, the EPA admits that yields have soared, even with "climate change".
No, the chart from the epa demonstrates climate change has an impact on our crops according to the epa. Doesn't show any dishonesty on my part.
How does a 150% increase in crop production demonstrate the climate change reduces crop production?
You'd have to read the epa article, it discusses it in depth, link already provided.
Still waiting on a trusted source who disputes climate change from you silly fuckers and you can't provide one.
Still waiting on a scientific source from you that claims man is responsible for anything that is actually based on empirical data and has no computer derived science fiction as it's primary source.
Good luck with that. And BTW, in Science that's how it's done. YOU make the claim, YOU support the claim.
You're not going to trust a science based source that uses computer models? Let me see if I can go find a pen and some graph paper.....should be some here in a drawer....be right back....
Farmers are having record year crop productions, which doesn't fit with your bull shit either.
Why wouldn't they? At least in the U.S. where we aren't feeling the affects of climate change quite as severely as other parts of the world. But, why wait?
https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/66560/WP119_FINAL.pdf
According to the most recent IPCC report, changes in climates over the last 30 years
have already reduced global agricultural production in the range 1-5 % per decade
globally, with particularly negative effects for tropical cereal crops such as maize and
rice (Porter et al., 2014). In addition, there is now mounting evidence suggesting that
even at low (+2 ºC) levels of warming, agricultural productivity is likely to decline
across the globe, but particularly across tropical areas (Challinor et al., 2014). This
Working Paper provides an overview of projected climate change impacts on crop
production and suitability across Africa, using a combination of literature review,
models and new data analysis
I believe that's from 2013, we already know that crop productions are being threatened and have already been affected by climate change. But, you wouldn't bother to look into it anyway, so what is the point of having this debate with you when one of your boneheaded ideas is to bring the bible into it that you did in another post.
So, do you really believe that crap study? Just figuring the low estimate of 1% per decade says that we are now producing three percent less than we otherwise would be. When i look at the food production rates i see no slow down I see more food than ever. In fact there is so much food out there that we can afford to waste 1.3 BILLION tons of food every year. That's lost, or allowed to rot, or simply thrown down the drain to keep prices up.
There is ZERO real evidence to support that assertion.
Food Waste: The Facts
You're using an organization whose goal is to fight hunger to make the point that there is plenty of food in the world. The rest of your post doesn't address anything.
Your EPA chart proves there is plenty of food in the world.
The graph by itself? No it doesn't.
You mean the exaggerated and highly adjusted upwards crap you think is evidence? Anyone can get a crayon and make up shit..What's the point of debating this anymore? The right does not accept the evidence.
You mean the exaggerated and highly adjusted upwards crap you think is evidence? Anyone can get a crayon and make up shit..What's the point of debating this anymore? The right does not accept the evidence.
The GOP, only party in the world that denies GW. And a lot of other stuff...a disgrace. And ty for wrecking the world...multiple times...
Do you know the difference in global warming and anthropogenic global warming?
I know the first is probably true.
There is no proof for the second.
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
LOL.. You FAILED!!!
2015 hottest year ever, 15 of 16 hottest years since 2001...
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
Why do alarmists feel it necessary to lie about warming when its been cooling now since 2004?
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
What a fool you are.. Do you think NOAA or NASA are reputable?
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
Why do alarmists feel it necessary to lie about warming when its been cooling now since 2004?
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
What a fool you are.. Do you think NOAA or NASA are reputable?
Who is reputable?
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
Why do alarmists feel it necessary to lie about warming when its been cooling now since 2004?
I'll ask you the same question the rest of the dipshits can't answer. Name a respectable organization that is not full of conspiracy nuts, right wing hacks or has ties to the oil industry that does not believe or better yet has evidence that humans are not the cause of climate change.
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
What a fool you are.. Do you think NOAA or NASA are reputable?
Who is reputable?
You have made yourself the arbiter of who is and is not credible.. So you tell me...
After I posted I realized what I did and removed it,
Yeah, I noticed you removed the chart that made your study look silly.
what difference does it make?
It shows you're dishonest.
It's still from the epa.
I know, the EPA admits that yields have soared, even with "climate change".
No, the chart from the epa demonstrates climate change has an impact on our crops according to the epa. Doesn't show any dishonesty on my part.
How does a 150% increase in crop production demonstrate the climate change reduces crop production?
You'd have to read the epa article, it discusses it in depth, link already provided.
Still waiting on a trusted source who disputes climate change from you silly fuckers and you can't provide one.
Still waiting on a scientific source from you that claims man is responsible for anything that is actually based on empirical data and has no computer derived science fiction as it's primary source.
Good luck with that. And BTW, in Science that's how it's done. YOU make the claim, YOU support the claim.
You're not going to trust a science based source that uses computer models? Let me see if I can go find a pen and some graph paper.....should be some here in a drawer....be right back....
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
Why do alarmists feel it necessary to lie about warming when its been cooling now since 2004?
IN other words, One YOU THINK IS OK... which means the only nut case is you becasue you fail to think for yourself or look at empirical evidence..
You have the question. You can't find an answer.
What a fool you are.. Do you think NOAA or NASA are reputable?
Who is reputable?
You have made yourself the arbiter of who is and is not credible.. So you tell me...
Sure, I'll take NASA, NOAA, almost every government, universities and corporations. What do you have?
