Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I know how it works, retard. And it remains true that a case dismissed on procedural grounds prior to reaching the merits doesn’t establish a damn thing. As you know.Um…..that is the way our Judicial System works Skippy.
You don’t reach the burden of proof if the case is never reached on the merits, you smarmy dipshit.If you are making a claim in court, the burden of proof is on you.
It’s not a fact that he had no proof. As you know. A case dismissed before the proof is presented doesn’t qualify as a dismissal on the merits, you jackass.The fact that Trump had no proof to support his claims does nothing to prove those claims are true
www.thegatewaypundit.com
I know how it works, retard. And it remains true that a case dismissed on procedural grounds prior to reaching the merits doesn’t establish a damn thin. As you know.
You don’t reach the burden of proof if the case is never reached on the merits, you smarmy dipshit.
It’s not a fact that he had no proof. As you know. A case dismissed before the proof is presented doesn’t qualify as a dismissal on the merits, you jackass.
Yup. You should be honest about the cases, rather using Democratic party talking points. It's lazy,Hard to argue with someone who just denies any evidence that doesn’t support their claims
nope Do your homeworkNice try Skippy, but not all of Trumps frivolous claims were dismissed for lack of standing. Most were dismissed for being frivolous
The 2020 presidential electionI'm sorry, did I miss something? What was rigged?
No it wasn't!The 2020 presidential election
Guess you didn’t read the OP. It’s OK.No it wasn't!
I read the OP, it didn't make any sense and it sure did not prove the election was rigged!Guess you didn’t read the OP. It’s OK.
Guess you didn’t listen to the audio. It’s OKI read the OP, it didn't make any sense and it sure did not prove the election was rigged!
This wad one of the most free and fair elections in recent times.
www.wionews.com
False. As you know, ya retard.
Why do you think they did it? Give me an educated guess.
Trump was correct. Trump is clairvoyant.
08/17/2020
Trump: ‘The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged’
I’m not at all surprised at how dishonest and stupid you are. Cases being tossed before reaching the merits doesn’t support you claim at all. Ever. As you know.
Already explained and answered. Now answer me please.Why no answer to this (in bold)...
remind me where it was a problem for you when the FBI interfered with the election in 2016 by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into Hillary's email server because they thought they found more email.
FaunGlad we agree. In terms of HRC it was because of Weiner and Huma Aberdeen. If Weiner doesn’t send lude photos this never happens. But HRCs campaign did delete emails, did bleach the server, did smash blackberries and iPads? Yet no one on your side of the aisle was banned from social media for saying it was a witch hunt or that Comey was biased. In this case even the NYP was censored. That’s the real issue. Unlike on this site, we could not have such debate on Twitter or FB. It was censored to favor one side.
Faun
As you can see I answered
Glad we agree. In terms of HRC it was because of Weiner and Huma Aberdeen. If Weiner doesn’t send lude photos this never happens. But HRCs campaign did delete emails, did bleach the server, did smash blackberries and iPads? Yet no one on your side of the aisle was banned from social media for saying it was a witch hunt or that Comey was biased. In this case even the NYP was censored. That’s the real issue. Unlike on this site, we could not have such debate on Twitter or FB. It was censored to favor one side.
Honestly I was so certainly HRC would win it did not seem like something that would impact the election. I was hoping Trump would win but believed it to be unlikely at best.You're conflating replying to my post with answering the question in my post.
My question was, why was that not a problem for you. Instead of answering that, you explained why the FBI reopened the investigation.
I don't recall you ever saying the FBI shouldn't have publicly announced they were reopening that investigation. Perhaps I'm wrong. Show me...
What would be the better question is how would I feel if that data was suppressed and not released? That would be terrible IMO.You're conflating replying to my post with answering the question in my post.
My question was, why was that not a problem for you. Instead of answering that, you explained why the FBI reopened the investigation.
I don't recall you ever saying the FBI shouldn't have publicly announced they were reopening that investigation. Perhaps I'm wrong. Show me...
