Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No, they want incarcerated felons to be able to vote. Twenty yeasr of proven crazy on top of a dead child + fry the bastard.We execute babies in the hundreds of thousands a year, yet when you have a murderer who is quite insane, we cant seem to pull the lever for death. If he isnt of sound mind, then remove him permanently from society, but then that would be one less Democrat voter.
this brings up the issue of "heat of the moment" crimes..
again, we should only execute serial murderers, cop killers and those who sell out our country in time of actual (not cold) war.
I doubt anyone can convince me to change my mind. In fact, I know no one ever will. I stand by what I said, t hat it is a very serious thing to send someone to his or her Judgment when the person may not be ready.
Jesus said Few find the Narrow way and St Paul confirmed, saying that we must undergo many hardships to enter Heaven
But who listesn to the Original Church on such matters?
yes, i know... hard to find the Original Church but some of us have
If it makes you happy, sure.The old testament. Those laws no longer apply. Should we refrain from eating shellfish also?
I cannot get too worked up for "the cause", more disturbed by the effects of anybody that would do that to a baby. He was a waste of space, and food. He will not be missed by me or really anybody else.Justice was served.
That doesn't happen enough.
Please.. mentally ill or not: you do the crime, you do the time (or worse)IMO no one has the right to take the life of another outside of direct self defense. But in the small picture argument, yes it is sad that a country would support putting the mentally ill to death.
well, I am not sure it took very long and it is a very serious thing to send a soul to its Judgment when maybe he is not ready. Therefore, I am NOT in favor of OK's death penalty views.
Again, I say the death penalty should only be for cop killers and serial killers and those who commit treason, as strictly defined.. Some people in govt seem to be betraying their country, putting other countries first.. but the definition of treason I am going by is.. where one basically colludes with an enemy our country is at war with (not a cold war, an actual war).
This is just another example of a left-wing weakling looking for excuses. I believe in an eye for an eye. Why in the hell should a killer be allowed to exist when the victim is forever DEAD?well, I am not sure it took very long and it is a very serious thing to send a soul to its Judgment when maybe he is not ready. Therefore, I am NOT in favor of OK's death penalty views.
Again, I say the death penalty should only be for cop killers and serial killers and those who commit treason, as strictly defined.. Some people in govt seem to be betraying their country, putting other countries first.. but the definition of treason I am going by is.. where one basically colludes with an enemy our country is at war with (not a cold war, an actual war).
Hey, something we can agree on.I cannot get too worked up for "the cause", more disturbed by the effects of anybody that would do that to a baby. He was a waste of space, and food. He will not be missed by me or really anybody else.
This is one reason Christ established a CHURCH. He knew better than anyone how human we all are.. aka how sinful and fallen, etc... we areIf it makes you happy, sure.
The point is you can validate almost any position with the Bible. Saying the Bible forbids something, great. Keep reading and you'll find support also
executingsomeone obviously does not bring that victim back to lifeThis is just another example of a left-wing weakling looking for excuses. I believe in an eye for an eye. Why in the hell should a killer be allowed to exist when the victim is forever DEAD?
Please.. mentally ill or not: you do the crime, you do the time (or worse)
That is the only thing that seems logical to me, since, for one thing: all criminals can be said to be mentally ill. For another: the crime has been committed and assuming its a just judgment, the punishment should be the same as for someone who does not have the mental illness defense.. This MI Defense is playing favorites (inequality in the justice system).
AND there is this:
Most mentally ill people do not murder others
This "free thecriminals bc they are mentally ill" BS is giving the mentally ill a bad name.. Most of the mentally ill are merely disturbed or there is a chemical imbalance in the brain.. they are NOT criminally inclined.
But it can be a deterrent to those who kill their helpless children. We have far too many of these stories where subhuman animals kill or mail their defenseless babies.executingsomeone obviously does not bring that victim back to life
Oooo. All caps.This is one reason Christ established a CHURCH. He knew better than anyone how human we all are.. aka how sinful and fallen, etc... we are
But it keeps someone who has the capacity to kill a child from doing it again.executingsomeone obviously does not bring that victim back to life
Oooo. All caps.
Doesn't really address what I said.
If he knew we can and would fail, then he also gave us the means to protect and govern ourselves. In the strictest of sense, he created the mental illness, but also gave us power of reason in what yo do about it.
There's a kibe drawn for when things go too far and drastic counter measures must be taken. That line however is different for us all. This is why we agree to have rules in our society.
And in this case, the man went over the line and there was no turning back. Society judges and doled out punishment.
While I don't think the death penalty should be quick to be used, it does have its place. Anyone who would do this to a child, well I see no gain in allowing this to be done again.
this brings up the issue of "heat of the moment" crimes..
again, we should only execute serial murderers, cop killers and those who sell out our country in time of actual (not cold) war.
Why pay $30k a year for life and up to house someone who's never going to see freedom again? Texas had 2.1k murders in 2020. $30k a year for then IN THAT YEAR ALONE is how much? Now do that across country and then consider this roughly repeats every year.If he spends the rest of his life confined, how would it be done again?
Why pay $30k a year for life and up to house someone who's never going to see freedom again? Texas had 2.1k murders in 2020. $30k a year for then IN THAT YEAR ALONE is how much? Now do that across country and then consider this roughly repeats every year.
Look, you wanna keep em alive, great. Find a remote island, drop them off and keep it guarded.
Let them fend for themselves and create their own justice.
Right, all it does is ensure justice. All it does is ensure no one else will die at the hands of a convicted killer. All it does is ensure closure for the victim's family who lost a loved one for life. "Come on man" Man up.executingsomeone obviously does not bring that victim back to life
Maybe we are so violent because we don't do enough to stop it.Kill because the alternative is more expensive.......and we wonder why we are such a violent nation.
