3 mass shooting, three semi automtic rifles

It is pathetic to see these stupid Moon Bats.

In his manifesto the NZ shooter said that he could have killed the Muslims with several different methods.

However, he chose AR-15s just to rile up the American anti gun nuts.

As usual our Moon Bat anti gun nuts are being Useful Idiots by jumping on his bandwagon and doing exactly what he wanted.
 
In his manifesto the NZ shooter said that he could have killed the Muslims with several different methods.

You take this asshole at his word?

He also gave some big props to Trump ya know.

He used an AR because it's easy. It's the weapon of choice for mass murder
 
Som, yiou have no clue that it is legal to own guns in New Zealand. If you are this uninformed, please shut the fuck up.

And unlike here...NZ is going to now BAN these weapons
There will always be a black market for the perps to continue being weaponized.
Not so much for the citizens who the government never had to worry about.
 
In his manifesto the NZ shooter said that he could have killed the Muslims with several different methods.

You take this asshole at his word?

He also gave some big props to Trump ya know.

He used an AR because it's easy. It's the weapon of choice for mass murder


No, moron, it isn't.....in fact, the handgun is the actual weapon of choice......and if you want to kill more people, the rental truck is deadlier than any rifle.

Mosque shooter...Killed 49, 42 at the gun free Mosque and only killed 7 at the Mosque where one of the innocent victims used a gun to drive him off.....

Nice, France......muslim terrorist used a rental truck and 5 minutes of driving to murder 86 people and injure 435....by any measure the rental truck is deadlier...and they all need to be banned...right?
 
In his manifesto the NZ shooter said that he could have killed the Muslims with several different methods.

You take this asshole at his word?

He also gave some big props to Trump ya know.

He used an AR because it's easy. It's the weapon of choice for mass murder


You are the Useful Idiot that is doing exactly what he wanted. Some being a moron and go read his manifesto. He said he could count on Useful Idiots like you and he was right.
 
Looks like the stupid sheeple in NZ are going to ban semi auto firearms for everybody because of the crime of one person. How oppressive is that? A nation of idiots.

They can do it in that socialist shithole because there are no checks and balances for the Parliamentary form of government. If the PM and a majority of Parliament agrees to it then it it is a done deal. Unlike in the US where we have a Senate and a President and then the Courts to decided if it is an infringement on the Bill of Rights.


Thank you George Mason, Alan Gura, and Antonin Scalia.
 
Fox CLEARLY separates hard news from the opinion shows.

The hell they do. And all of Fox DRIPS with anti-immigrant rhetoric

I did own an AR based rifle for hunting coyote. And it worked well. But I got rid of it years ago. Never cared for that style of rifle, for a number of reasons.

You're making my case for me.

You hunt (even wild pigs) and you have guns for home defense...and yet you don't own an AR...because it has no real purpose

For the record I own four. 2- 12 Ga pumps (a WInchester and an 870) a .22 bolt action, and a .50cal muzzleloader I built


Moron....the AR-15 is no differerent from any other semi-auto rifle, shotgun or pistol, they all operate the same way.....like saying I don't like the Toyota Camery but like the Ford Taurus...they operate the same way.

And by the way...the AR-15 is protected by the 2nd Amendment....specifically, by the opinion of Justice Scalia....

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf

That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.

Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.

The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.

Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid.

Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.
 
Looks like the stupid sheeple in NZ are going to ban semi auto firearms for everybody because of the crime of one person. How oppressive is that? A nation of idiots.

They can do it in that socialist shithole because there are no checks and balances for the Parliamentary form of government. If the PM and a majority of Parliament agrees to it then it it is a done deal. Unlike in the US where we have a Senate and a President and then the Courts to decided if it is an infringement on the Bill of Rights.


Thank you George Mason, Alan Gura, and Antonin Scalia.


They have had those rifles forever........lots of people have them there....and none of them have used them to commit murder........except for one guy...

This is how stupid left wing, anti-gunners are.

How long do you think the anti-gunners there were praying for a mass public shooting like this so they could ban guns?
 
Moron....the AR-15 is no differerent from any other semi-auto rifle

You actually got that right. Well sorta. There are semi-autos which are not magazine fed. THAT is a major difference...but I agree...we need to ban all the mag fed semi-autos
 
none of them have used them to commit murder........except for one guy...

One guy here...one guy there...another over here...and on and on...and the result?
hundreds even thousands over the years dead
 
Moron....the AR-15 is no differerent from any other semi-auto rifle

You actually got that right. Well sorta. There are semi-autos which are not magazine fed. THAT is a major difference...but I agree...we need to ban all the mag fed semi-autos


Yep....a fascist like you will not stop until all guns are banned..... the other fascists like you are going after tube fed semi-autos too....you will never stop...it isn't in you to allow any freedom for anyone, you have a mental illness.
 
I remind you of Parkland where a coach and several football players were gunned down trying to stop that horror. Had they caught that asshoile changing mags..or trying to load bullet by bullet...they might have been successful
Your opinion is meaningless and unsupported by fact.
 
Yea...fascist...might as well call me a "doodyhead" for all the accuracy of it
 
none of them have used them to commit murder........except for one guy...

One guy here...one guy there...another over here...and on and on...and the result?
hundreds even thousands over the years dead


No, moron......

2017, deaths from mass public shootings? 117

Deaths from cars, 2017 ? 38,659

So....according to your logic, we need to ban cars....

Meanwhile...as more Americans own and carry guns...our gun murder rate went down 49%, our gun crime rate went down 75%....

You have no facts, truth or reality to support what you believe...

Over the last 26 years, we went from 200 million guns in private hands in the 1990s and 4.7 million people carrying guns for self defense in 1997...to close to 400-600 million guns in private hands and over 17.25 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2018...guess what happened...


-- gun murder down 49%

--gun crime down 75%

--violent crime down 72%

Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak; Public Unaware

Compared with 1993, the peak of U.S. gun homicides, the firearm homicide rate was 49% lower in 2010, and there were fewer deaths, even though the nation’s population grew. The victimization rate for other violent crimes with a firearm—assaults, robberies and sex crimes—was 75% lower in 2011 than in 1993. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall (with or without a firearm) also is down markedly (72%) over two decades.
 
“Assault weapon is a non-technical term referring to any broad category of firearms with certain features. Assault weapons include some semi-automatic rifle, some pistols and some shotguns.”
Assault Weapon Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.
That a rifle or carbine is not select-fire doesn’t mean it isn’t an assault weapon, and it doesn’t mean it can’t be regulated as such.
An assault weapon exists as a consequence of the law, regardless its configuration and functionality.
Thank you, captain obvious.
 
As I POSTED stupid..it has been attempted and those folks ended up being KILLED...because ya know...magazines are so easy to change
What's easier to change in a "split second" - a 10 round magazine or a 30-rd magazine?
 
[
Dude..their murder rate is less than a quarter of ours.
That;s just the FACTS
Dude... if all our guns suddenly disappeared and no one decided to use another weapon, our murder rate would still be twice theirs.
A rational, reasoned person would see this and conclude our problem, and their solution, have nothing to do with gun laws.
 

Forum List

Back
Top