Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1) Tax cuts pay for themselves.
Wrong. Every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar the government needs to borrow to pay their bills. It's so obnoxious when repubs complain of gov spending yet are too ignorant to realize tax cutting leads to more borrowing. You think over spending is the only reason for our debt? No, it is also because of Bush's tax cuts.
2) Liberals are socialists/communists
Also wrong. We are talking about fundamental definitions of words here. Saying liberals are socialists is just as stupid as saying conservatives are liberals.
3) The wealthy are not too wealthy.
95% of income gains have gone to the top 5% of earners despite the fact that the lower classes are responsible for most of the productivity. In fact, productivity has grown exponentially in the lower classes since the 30s yet wages have remained flat.
#4. Liberals are stupid, see 1, 2, 3 above.
And yet you can't explain what makes them stupid.
Tax cuts done properly promote industry and jobs, so #1 is a lie.
By their beliefs and actions liberals/progressives/lefties or whatever you want to call them tend to be socialistic and communistic, so another lie by the OP.
The richer most people get in industry, the more jobs they help middle class with, so #3 is a stupid remark.
Extreme liberal thinking sucks!
Targeted tax cuts are taxes done properly, and promote economic activity; across the board tax cuts are disproportional and greatly benefit the few and not the many. The Democrats under Clinton and Obama have focused tax cut targeted to help the many, which in turn help the few as consumption of goods and services increases.
You argue that my beliefs tend to be socialistic or communistic, easy to say but you and others use such words as pejoratives for their emotional affect and have no basis in reality.
[If the PPACA were 'socialism' is would make all medical professionals employees of the government and outlaw insurance companies. It does none of those things].
Liberals think, that you find such activity dangerous is hysterical.
1) Tax cuts pay for themselves.
Wrong. Every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar the government needs to borrow to pay their bills. It's so obnoxious when repubs complain of gov spending yet are too ignorant to realize tax cutting leads to more borrowing. You think over spending is the only reason for our debt? No, it is also because of Bush's tax cuts.
2) Liberals are socialists/communists
Also wrong. We are talking about fundamental definitions of words here. Saying liberals are socialists is just as stupid as saying conservatives are liberals.
3) The wealthy are not too wealthy.
95% of income gains have gone to the top 5% of earners despite the fact that the lower classes are responsible for most of the productivity. In fact, productivity has grown exponentially in the lower classes since the 30s yet wages have remained flat.
1) They do pay for themselves. You see, if you have more people paying taxes on more economic activity you can actually make MORE money then you currently have. In fact, every time taxes are cut, the economy improves and the treasury brings more money in. It's called the Laffer Curve, look it up.
2) The leadership sure leans that way. Progressives called themselves progressives because they believe in progresing society towards socialism/communism step by step. Through evolution rather than revolution. When progressives were exposed in the 1920s, they scared the heck out of the population and so rebranded themselves as liberals, while traditional "liberal" viewpoints were adopted by conservatives and libertarians.
3) Who the heck are you to determine what too wealthy is? If someone is blessed more for his labor, why should I have a right to force him to pay for what I want to be done? Why should I be angry at my brother because of his success? Rather, I should rejoice in it. And persuade and encourage him to use his resources wisely. But how he ultimately uses it is between him and God. Why do you want to be a robber in your heart?
1) bullshit. Only 4.6 jobs were created per million dollar cut from Bush's tax cuts. Tax cuts for the wealthy only help the wealthy. All they do is stimulate supply. They do very little to stimulate demand. Only a con would think less revenue is a good thing.
2) typical fluff. Why do you bother?
3) so you think it is a good thing only the wealthy have seen income gains since the 30s?
1) bullshit. Only 4.6 jobs were created per million dollar cut from Bush's tax cuts. Tax cuts for the wealthy only help the wealthy. All they do is stimulate supply. They do very little to stimulate demand. Only a con would think less revenue is a good thing.
2) typical fluff. Why do you bother?
3) so you think it is a good thing only the wealthy have seen income gains since the 30s?
about one million more Americans were working in the Bush years then are working now.
true story
pretty comical; a left-wing idiot whining that the Bush tax cuts didn't create many jobs.
what did we get for the almost $1 trillion Obama Stimulus? do any of those jobs still exist?
be honest with your self leftard; do they still exist?
The financial crisis happened under Bush's watch. We lost 2.3 million jobs in his last few months. Millions more were lost until the The Recovery Act was implemented. Altogether, the stimulus created or saved 2.5 million jobs. Had it been bigger like it was meant to be, we would be out of this mess.
about one million more Americans were working in the Bush years then are working now.
true story
pretty comical; a left-wing idiot whining that the Bush tax cuts didn't create many jobs.
what did we get for the almost $1 trillion Obama Stimulus? do any of those jobs still exist?
be honest with your self leftard; do they still exist?
The financial crisis happened under Bush's watch. We lost 2.3 million jobs in his last few months. Millions more were lost until the The Recovery Act was implemented. Altogether, the stimulus created or saved 2.5 million jobs. Had it been bigger like it was meant to be, we would be out of this mess.
Ok, a credible non partisan source would be nice.
BTW, only 10% of the Stimulus actually went to the private sector.
The other went to unionized public employees. Few of which still have their jobs.
One trillion dollars in money we did not have all gone with no appreciable positive results.
The stimulus was a failure.
I will ask once again; do the Stimulus jobs still exist?
stimulus wasn't meant to be endless you LWNJs.
GOD what morons!
you don't believe in our system; you believe in welfare and food stamps and making people dependent on the government; and it shows; because that is exactly what we got right now
why do you fools on the Left act surprised we have record levels of what you believe in?
1) Tax cuts pay for themselves.
Wrong. Every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar the government needs to borrow to pay their bills. It's so obnoxious when repubs complain of gov spending yet are too ignorant to realize tax cutting leads to more borrowing. You think over spending is the only reason for our debt? No, it is also because of Bush's tax cuts.
2) Liberals are socialists/communists
Also wrong. We are talking about fundamental definitions of words here. Saying liberals are socialists is just as stupid as saying conservatives are liberals.
3) The wealthy are not too wealthy.
95% of income gains have gone to the top 5% of earners despite the fact that the lower classes are responsible for most of the productivity. In fact, productivity has grown exponentially in the lower classes since the 30s yet wages have remained flat.
Can you please stop making a complete idiot yourself? Or are you simply not capable of stopping yourself?all of the sudden the Left is saying huge numbers of people actually dont want to work. they would be the first to soil themselves in a hissy fit if a Republican said that
idiots and hypocrites
It's the Bureau of Labor Statistics making that claim. The BLS is not the "left." I'm just repeating their claim.
really?
oh good; show me where the BLS says all those people "dont want to work"
you can do it chump!!
and what was your number again? 94% or something?/
go for it!
Seriously, that's your proof?? Wow. You're even stupider than I thought. And that's saying something.Can you please stop making a complete idiot yourself? Or are you simply not capable of stopping yourself?
It's the Bureau of Labor Statistics making that claim. The BLS is not the "left." I'm just repeating their claim.
really?
oh good; show me where the BLS says all those people "dont want to work"
you can do it chump!!
and what was your number again? 94% or something?/
go for it!
You never learn, do you, rightard? Of course I can do it ...
Number of people not in the labor force: 92,534,000
Number of those who want a job now: 6,508,000
6.5 million out of 92.5 million is 93%. Sorry, I was off by 1 percentage point because I hadn't calculated the numbers since the latest figures have been released.
You may now crawl back under your rock, rightie.
Seriously, that's your proof?? Wow. You're even stupider than I thought. And that's saying something.really?
oh good; show me where the BLS says all those people "dont want to work"
you can do it chump!!
and what was your number again? 94% or something?/
go for it!
You never learn, do you, rightard? Of course I can do it ...
Number of people not in the labor force: 92,534,000
Number of those who want a job now: 6,508,000
6.5 million out of 92.5 million is 93%. Sorry, I was off by 1 percentage point because I hadn't calculated the numbers since the latest figures have been released.
You may now crawl back under your rock, rightie.
1) They do pay for themselves. You see, if you have more people paying taxes on more economic activity you can actually make MORE money then you currently have. In fact, every time taxes are cut, the economy improves and the treasury brings more money in. It's called the Laffer Curve, look it up.
2) The leadership sure leans that way. Progressives called themselves progressives because they believe in progresing society towards socialism/communism step by step. Through evolution rather than revolution. When progressives were exposed in the 1920s, they scared the heck out of the population and so rebranded themselves as liberals, while traditional "liberal" viewpoints were adopted by conservatives and libertarians.
3) Who the heck are you to determine what too wealthy is? If someone is blessed more for his labor, why should I have a right to force him to pay for what I want to be done? Why should I be angry at my brother because of his success? Rather, I should rejoice in it. And persuade and encourage him to use his resources wisely. But how he ultimately uses it is between him and God. Why do you want to be a robber in your heart?
Totally brainwashed ^^^. The 'Laughter' curve is nothing more than an excuse for greed.
I'm not aware of any progressive organization calling for socialism, nor is socialism a gateway to communism; maybe a full brainwash wasn't necessary, a slight rinse was in all probability all that was necessary.
Too wealthy is when the 1% control the means of legislation, when laws benefit the few and not the many. CU v. FEC has taken weakened our democracy and moved us further toward oligarchical control.
As it is written, so it shall be: "The rich will despoil the earth, the air and the water"
ironic that the rich are getting much richer then they were before; and at a faster rate; under Progressive Majority rule isnt it?
but then again that is the whole point isnt it?
the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things
true story
ok; now enter the next excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE here___________________
Totally brainwashed ^^^. The 'Laughter' curve is nothing more than an excuse for greed.
I'm not aware of any progressive organization calling for socialism, nor is socialism a gateway to communism; maybe a full brainwash wasn't necessary, a slight rinse was in all probability all that was necessary.
Too wealthy is when the 1% control the means of legislation, when laws benefit the few and not the many. CU v. FEC has taken weakened our democracy and moved us further toward oligarchical control.
As it is written, so it shall be: "The rich will despoil the earth, the air and the water"
ironic that the rich are getting much richer then they were before; and at a faster rate; under Progressive Majority rule isnt it?
but then again that is the whole point isnt it?
the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things
true story
ok; now enter the next excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE here___________________
"the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things"
Maybe you should read this in it's entirety:
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before - Jordan Weissmann - The Atlantic
It seems that your statement isn't accurate at all.
Seriously, that's your proof?? Wow. You're even stupider than I thought. And that's saying something.You never learn, do you, rightard? Of course I can do it ...
Number of people not in the labor force: 92,534,000
Number of those who want a job now: 6,508,000
6.5 million out of 92.5 million is 93%. Sorry, I was off by 1 percentage point because I hadn't calculated the numbers since the latest figures have been released.
You may now crawl back under your rock, rightie.
Please excuse Rabbi; he has never been socialized (and probably 'thinks' that comment means I've suggested he's not a socialist).
Totally brainwashed ^^^. The 'Laughter' curve is nothing more than an excuse for greed.
I'm not aware of any progressive organization calling for socialism, nor is socialism a gateway to communism; maybe a full brainwash wasn't necessary, a slight rinse was in all probability all that was necessary.
Too wealthy is when the 1% control the means of legislation, when laws benefit the few and not the many. CU v. FEC has taken weakened our democracy and moved us further toward oligarchical control.
As it is written, so it shall be: "The rich will despoil the earth, the air and the water"
ironic that the rich are getting much richer then they were before; and at a faster rate; under Progressive Majority rule isnt it?
but then again that is the whole point isnt it?
the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things
true story
ok; now enter the next excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE here___________________
"the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things"
Maybe you should read this in it's entirety:
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before - Jordan Weissmann - The Atlantic
It seems that your statement isn't accurate at all.
ironic that the rich are getting much richer then they were before; and at a faster rate; under Progressive Majority rule isnt it?
but then again that is the whole point isnt it?
the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things
true story
ok; now enter the next excuse for PROGRESSIVE FAILURE here___________________
"the poor and Middle Class had it MUCH BETTER when Repubs ran things"
Maybe you should read this in it's entirety:
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before
America's Lost Decade Turns 12: Even the Rich Are Worse Off Than Before - Jordan Weissmann - The Atlantic
It seems that your statement isn't accurate at all.
"The middle class has been buried by the last 4 years." -Joe Biden.
