3 things liberals can't lie about

[Full-Auto]

Why do you lie?

Well lets see
In August of last year

CBS

The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush\
The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

​

Has Papa Obama not passed it yet



Bush's average is $51 billion a month to the national debt.
Using August 2011, Papa Obama was 31 months in office and added to the national debt at an
average monthly rate of $129 billion.

152% more per month than Bush




Truth is hard for the left
in fact it is their worst enemy

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

The dem congress wrote the last two budgets, even to the point they would not send the last one in its entirety. Bushs biggest downfall was trying to appease democrats and it still wasnt enough.

 

[bripat9643]

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

Obama was inaugurated Jan 22, not Sept 30, dipstick.

You can never trust any numbers libturds post because they always play games with the numbers. Another way to say that is "they lie."

He is using fiscal years.

Do you think Obama should be held responsible for Bush's budget?

Yes, he should. His stimulus was passed well before the end of Bush's last fiscal year, and it took effect immediately. Furthermore, he had $350 billion of TARP money to spend. The fiscal year might be relevant if spending had stayed on that trajectory, but we all know Obama jacked it up massively.

 

[Article 15]

Well lets see
In August of last year

CBS

The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush\
The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

​

Has Papa Obama not passed it yet



Bush's average is $51 billion a month to the national debt.
Using August 2011, Papa Obama was 31 months in office and added to the national debt at an
average monthly rate of $129 billion.

152% more per month than Bush




Truth is hard for the left
in fact it is their worst enemy

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

The dem congress wrote the last two budgets, even to the point they would not send the last one in its entirety. Bushs biggest downfall was trying to appease democrats and it still wasnt enough.

Incorrect. The last two budgets of the Bush presidency, which included the first $3 trillion+ budget were submitted by the Bush administration.

 

[DontBeStupid]

The reality remains
Papa Obama spends 152% more per month than Bush

No need me to thank for bringing you the truth

Historical Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

You. Are. Wrong.

 

[Full-Auto]

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

The dem congress wrote the last two budgets, even to the point they would not send the last one in its entirety. Bushs biggest downfall was trying to appease democrats and it still wasnt enough.

Incorrect. The last two budgets of the Bush presidency, which included the first $3 trillion+ budget were submitted by the Bush administration.

The president submits his version the congress writes the details and does not rubber stamp you lying douche.

 

[Article 15]

Seriously, what's with you guys and trotting out the same lies over and over and over and over?

 

[DontBeStupid]

Obama was inaugurated Jan 22, not Sept 30, dipstick.

You can never trust any numbers libturds post because they always play games with the numbers. Another way to say that is "they lie."

He is using fiscal years.

Do you think Obama should be held responsible for Bush's budget?

Yes, he should. His stimulus was passed well before the end of Bush's last fiscal year, and it took effect immediately. Furthermore, he had $350 billion of TARP money to spend. The fiscal year might be relevant if spending had stayed on that trajectory, but we all know Obama jacked it up massively.

The day Obama took office the budget deficit was at $1.2T already. In September of that year it was $1.4T.

Obama added $200B to the deficit that year.

 

[Neotrotsky]

The reality remains
Papa Obama spends 152% more per month than Bush

No need me to thank for bringing you the truth

Historical Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

You. Are. Wrong.

You do know your link does not support your argument
but thanks for link anyway

Not at all, even if we factor out 2009 to help Papa Obama
It is still bad for him

• In fairness, however, Obama can't rightly be held accountable for the 2009 budget, which he didn't sign (although he did sign a $410 billion pork-laden omnibus spending bill for that year, which is nevertheless tallied in Bush's column). Rather, Obama's record to date should really be based on actual and projected spending in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 (plus the $265 billion portion of the economic "stimulus" package, which he initiated and signed, that was spent in 2009 (Table S-10), while Bush's should be based on 2002-09 (with the exception of that same $265 billion, which was in no way part of the 2009 budgetary process).
  
• How do Bush and Obama compare on closer inspection? Just about like they do on an initial glance. According to the White House's Office of Management and Budget, during his eight fiscal years, Bush ran up a total of $3.283 trillion in deficit spending (p. 22). In his first two fiscal years, Obama will run up a total of $2.826 trillion in deficit spending ($1.294 trillion in 2010, an estimated $1.267 trillion in 2011 (p. 23), and the $265 billion in "stimulus" money that was spent in 2009). Thus, Bush ran up an average of $410 billion in deficit spending per year, while Obama is running up an average of $1.413 trillion in deficit spending per year &#8212; or $1.003 trillion a year more than Bush.

​

 

[Article 15]

The dem congress wrote the last two budgets, even to the point they would not send the last one in its entirety. Bushs biggest downfall was trying to appease democrats and it still wasnt enough.

Incorrect. The last two budgets of the Bush presidency, which included the first $3 trillion+ budget were submitted by the Bush administration.

The president submits his version the congress writes the details and does not rubber stamp you lying douche.

Awww you mad that I debunked your lie, bro?

 

[Neotrotsky]

Did you ever notice how posters
who self proclaim that they "won" or "debunked" someone

Never really do..

Funny how that works

 

[DontBeStupid]

The reality remains
Papa Obama spends 152% more per month than Bush

No need me to thank for bringing you the truth

Historical Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

You. Are. Wrong.

You do know your link does not support your argument
but thanks for link anyway

Not at all, even if we factor out 2009 to help Papa Obama
It is still bad for him

• In fairness, however, Obama can't rightly be held accountable for the 2009 budget, which he didn't sign (although he did sign a $410 billion pork-laden omnibus spending bill for that year, which is nevertheless tallied in Bush's column). Rather, Obama's record to date should really be based on actual and projected spending in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 (plus the $265 billion portion of the economic "stimulus" package, which he initiated and signed, that was spent in 2009 (Table S-10), while Bush's should be based on 2002-09 (with the exception of that same $265 billion, which was in no way part of the 2009 budgetary process).
  
• How do Bush and Obama compare on closer inspection? Just about like they do on an initial glance. According to the White House's Office of Management and Budget, during his eight fiscal years, Bush ran up a total of $3.283 trillion in deficit spending (p. 22). In his first two fiscal years, Obama will run up a total of $2.826 trillion in deficit spending ($1.294 trillion in 2010, an estimated $1.267 trillion in 2011 (p. 23), and the $265 billion in "stimulus" money that was spent in 2009). Thus, Bush ran up an average of $410 billion in deficit spending per year, while Obama is running up an average of $1.413 trillion in deficit spending per year — or $1.003 trillion a year more than Bush.

​

So now you want to make it only about deficit spending?

Well, I guess that makes sense since your previous statement was proven wrong.

 

[Article 15]

Did you ever notice how posters
who self proclaim that they "won" or "debunked" someone

Never really do..

Funny how that works

What's funny is that despite your lies being refuted you we be back again sooner than later peddling the same BS as if none of this happened.

 

[Neotrotsky]

Historical Federal Receipt and Outlay Summary

You. Are. Wrong.

You do know your link does not support your argument
but thanks for link anyway

Not at all, even if we factor out 2009 to help Papa Obama
It is still bad for him

• In fairness, however, Obama can't rightly be held accountable for the 2009 budget, which he didn't sign (although he did sign a $410 billion pork-laden omnibus spending bill for that year, which is nevertheless tallied in Bush's column). Rather, Obama's record to date should really be based on actual and projected spending in fiscal years 2010 and 2011 (plus the $265 billion portion of the economic "stimulus" package, which he initiated and signed, that was spent in 2009 (Table S-10), while Bush's should be based on 2002-09 (with the exception of that same $265 billion, which was in no way part of the 2009 budgetary process).
  
• How do Bush and Obama compare on closer inspection? Just about like they do on an initial glance. According to the White House's Office of Management and Budget, during his eight fiscal years, Bush ran up a total of $3.283 trillion in deficit spending (p. 22). In his first two fiscal years, Obama will run up a total of $2.826 trillion in deficit spending ($1.294 trillion in 2010, an estimated $1.267 trillion in 2011 (p. 23), and the $265 billion in "stimulus" money that was spent in 2009). Thus, Bush ran up an average of $410 billion in deficit spending per year, while Obama is running up an average of $1.413 trillion in deficit spending per year &#8212; or $1.003 trillion a year more than Bush.

​

So now you want to make it only about deficit spending?

Well, I guess that makes sense since your previous statement was proven wrong.

Sure, Hey it is your story and you can tell it anyway you want



Of course, everybody knows Papa Obama spends less than Bush

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Why do you lie?

Well lets see
In August of last year

CBS

The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush\
The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

​

Has Papa Obama not passed it yet



Bush's average is $51 billion a month to the national debt.
Using August 2011, Papa Obama was 31 months in office and added to the national debt at an
average monthly rate of $129 billion.

152% more per month than Bush




Truth is hard for the left
in fact it is their worst enemy

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

More DERP^^^^^^^^^
OH yes those last two years of bushes presidency was terrible. Wait was obama a junior senator in a democratic controlled congress and senate? So obama helped to leave a shitty economy.

 

[Article 15]

Well lets see
In August of last year

CBS

The national debt increased $4.9 trillion during the eight-year presidency of George W. Bush\
The debt was $10.626 trillion on the day Mr. Obama took office. The latest calculation from Treasury shows the debt has now hit $14.639 trillion.

​

Has Papa Obama not passed it yet



Bush's average is $51 billion a month to the national debt.
Using August 2011, Papa Obama was 31 months in office and added to the national debt at an
average monthly rate of $129 billion.

152% more per month than Bush




Truth is hard for the left
in fact it is their worst enemy

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

More DERP^^^^^^^^^
OH yes those last two years of bushes presidency was terrible. Wait was obama a junior senator in a democratic controlled congress and senate? So obama helped to leave a shitty economy.

Just when you thought this thread couldn't get any dumber in walks littledebnc.

 

[Neotrotsky]

in other words

you have no facts
thanks
but we already knew that,...


No one believes that Papa Obama spent more than Bush

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Debt doesn't equal spending and from Sept 30, 2001 - Sept 30, 2009 the debt increased $6.1 trillion. <---------------- That's Bush's addition to the debt

Bush also left Obama with a $1 trillion dollar deficit, and economy plummeting towards bottom.

Now that you've been informed you can stop lying about it.

More DERP^^^^^^^^^
OH yes those last two years of bushes presidency was terrible. Wait was obama a junior senator in a democratic controlled congress and senate? So obama helped to leave a shitty economy.

Just when you thought this thread couldn't get any dumber in walks littledebnc.

At least I am not stupid enough to forget that the last two years of the bush presidency, the senate and congress was controlled by the democrats and obama was a junior senator. You on the other hand are a dumb ass for not knowing that.

 

[Article 15]

in other words

you have no facts
thanks
but we already knew that,...

Yeah, that's the ticket.

None of your BS has been refuted with facts, none at all.

 

[Article 15]

More DERP^^^^^^^^^
OH yes those last two years of bushes presidency was terrible. Wait was obama a junior senator in a democratic controlled congress and senate? So obama helped to leave a shitty economy.

Just when you thought this thread couldn't get any dumber in walks littledebnc.

At least I am not stupid enough to forget that the last two years of the bush presidency, the senate and congress was controlled by the democrats and obama was a junior senator. You on the other hand are a dumb ass for not knowing that.

Obama was a Senator and the Dems had majorities in the House and Senate after the 2006 mid terms? You're blowing my mind with these new revelations, dude, you really are.

 

[Neotrotsky]

in other words

you have no facts
thanks
but we already knew that,...

Yeah, that's the ticket.

None of your BS has been refuted with facts, none at all.

First true statement you have made

Just claimed you "won" or "debunked"
that argument always seems to work for you