Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Christ's vicar on earth is a minion? I'll alert Bill Donahue (the Anti-Pope), or is he the one who told you?You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Don't hate anybody. Do love this country, and I have prepared enough meals to know when the pot is full. Adding to a pot already filled creates a mess.
We need to take a page from the other countries' playbooks, who realize flooding their countries with UN ideology and terrorists is a really bad idea. The Pope is an Obama minion. He does what he is told. Ignore him.
350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
LOL.....pretty hilarious post.
Considering that we are a nation of immigrants.
In 1900 you would have been complaining about the Italians and Irish.
In 1890 you would have been complaining about the Chinese.
350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
LOL.....pretty hilarious post.
Considering that we are a nation of immigrants.
In 1900 you would have been complaining about the Italians and Irish.
In 1890 you would have been complaining about the Chinese.
Christ's vicar on earth is a minion? I'll alert Bill Donahue (the Anti-Pope), or is he the one who told you?You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Don't hate anybody. Do love this country, and I have prepared enough meals to know when the pot is full. Adding to a pot already filled creates a mess.
We need to take a page from the other countries' playbooks, who realize flooding their countries with UN ideology and terrorists is a really bad idea. The Pope is an Obama minion. He does what he is told. Ignore him.
And now you have one that I like because he's almost a Christian, so you hate him of course...Christ's vicar on earth is a minion? I'll alert Bill Donahue (the Anti-Pope), or is he the one who told you?You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Don't hate anybody. Do love this country, and I have prepared enough meals to know when the pot is full. Adding to a pot already filled creates a mess.
We need to take a page from the other countries' playbooks, who realize flooding their countries with UN ideology and terrorists is a really bad idea. The Pope is an Obama minion. He does what he is told. Ignore him.
We have had good presidents and bad ones. Catholics have had good popes and bad ones.
False prophet? Who's the real one, Donald Trump?Stop with the "you hate" garbage. I have no reason to hate him. I have no reason to trust him. I see him as a false prophet. Nothing more, nothing less. He has no effect on me one way or another, anymore than you liking him makes you a Christian.
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government.
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government.
Healthmyths,
Illegal aliens, by offering cheap labor to the agricultural, construction and food service industries in places like California, are the lifeblood of the current form of capitalism.
Call it the Walmart labor model which increases profits precisely because it transfers the burden of supporting the working class from wages to the state. (Cha'ching!)
On the model, corporations rely on the state to fill in the gaps created by insufficient wages and benefits.
Big Agriculture (which generously supported Reagan, both Bush's and Clinton) LOVES ultra cheap illegal labor.
And what about Reagan's chief financial advisor (who also happens to be the most influential rightwing economist in the last century) Milton Friedman, who said economic efficiency occurs when there are no territorial or legal boundaries separating capital from all the world's labor markets. This is partly why Reagan passed the largest Amnesty Bill in this nation's history - to break Union control in the southwest by flooding it with cheap labor.
Listen Healthmyths. You are a cut-n-paste Republican who transfers talking points from one place to another. We get it. But there is a talking point you haven't even considered - and it has to do with the value of illegal immigrants to your party's ideological goals.
We already know that illegal aliens provide our free market corporations with cheap labor, which gives them what they most need: higher profits. But there is another value to letting these illegals into the country. It has to do with fear. It allows your party's message machine to tap into the nativism and racial pride of the low-information voter. Like Hitler with the Jews, you can point to illegals (along with the gays/Muslims/ atheists/Hollywood liberals/lame-stream media etc., etc.) and claim that the country has been infected by an external contagion - one that is destroying the very borders, language and culture which defines our nation.
You can scare stupid people into the voting booth where they will unwittingly pull the lever for tax and regulatory policies that only serve the wealthy elite (who owns your politicians and news sources).
Point is: by giving your corporations higher profits ... while at the same time giving your information sources an electoral boogeyman to mobilize the stupid, illegal aliens cover two-birds with one stone.
It's called a two'fer.
(Onward my little cut-n-paste soldier. Onward!)
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government.
Healthmyths,
Illegal aliens, by offering cheap labor to the agricultural, construction and food service industries in places like California, are the lifeblood of the current form of capitalism.
Call it the Walmart labor model which increases profits precisely because it transfers the burden of supporting the working class from wages to the state. (Cha'ching!)
On the model, corporations rely on the state to fill in the gaps created by insufficient wages and benefits.
Big Agriculture (which generously supported Reagan, both Bush's and Clinton) LOVES ultra cheap illegal labor.
And what about Reagan's chief financial advisor (who also happens to be the most influential rightwing economist in the last century) Milton Friedman, who said economic efficiency occurs when there are no territorial or legal boundaries separating capital from all the world's labor markets. This is partly why Reagan passed the largest Amnesty Bill in this nation's history - to break Union control in the southwest by flooding it with cheap labor.
Listen Healthmyths. You are a cut-n-paste Republican who transfers talking points from one place to another. We get it. But there is a talking point you haven't even considered - and it has to do with the value of illegal immigrants to your party's ideological goals.
We already know that illegal aliens provide our free market corporations with cheap labor, which gives them what they most need: higher profits. But there is another value to letting these illegals into the country. It has to do with fear. It allows your party's message machine to tap into the nativism and racial pride of the low-information voter. Like Hitler with the Jews, you can point to illegals (along with the gays/Muslims/ atheists/Hollywood liberals/lame-stream media etc., etc.) and claim that the country has been infected by an external contagion - one that is destroying the very borders, language and culture which defines our nation.
You can scare stupid people into the voting booth where they will unwittingly pull the lever for tax and regulatory policies that only serve the wealthy elite (who owns your politicians and news sources).
Point is: by giving your corporations higher profits ... while at the same time giving your information sources an electoral boogeyman to mobilize the stupid, illegal aliens cover two-birds with one stone.
It's called a two'fer.
(Onward my little cut-n-paste soldier. Onward!)
We know, you hate little brown Americans. What a shame for you then that we have this:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Yeah except....
Many today assume the second half of the citizenship clause ("subject to the jurisdiction thereof") merely refers to the day-to-day laws to which we are all subject. But the original understanding referred to political allegiance. Being subject to U.S. jurisdiction meant, as then-Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lyman Trumbull stated, "not owing allegiance to anybody else [but] subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States." The author of the provision, Sen. Jacob Merritt Howard of Michigan, pointed out that the jurisdiction language "will not, of course, include foreigners."
Christ's vicar on earth is a minion? I'll alert Bill Donahue (the Anti-Pope), or is he the one who told you?You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Don't hate anybody. Do love this country, and I have prepared enough meals to know when the pot is full. Adding to a pot already filled creates a mess.
We need to take a page from the other countries' playbooks, who realize flooding their countries with UN ideology and terrorists is a really bad idea. The Pope is an Obama minion. He does what he is told. Ignore him.
Some Catholic you are...Christ's vicar on earth is a minion? I'll alert Bill Donahue (the Anti-Pope), or is he the one who told you?You sound just like those who used to hate the Catholics. Disease-ridden breeders don't ya know. Soon the Pope will run America they said...350,000 anchors, plus the 100,000. Muslims a month, plus welcoming anyone that can walk, means no more America. It is the change you voted for.
Don't hate anybody. Do love this country, and I have prepared enough meals to know when the pot is full. Adding to a pot already filled creates a mess.
We need to take a page from the other countries' playbooks, who realize flooding their countries with UN ideology and terrorists is a really bad idea. The Pope is an Obama minion. He does what he is told. Ignore him.
When did Christ make a Pope a vicar? Of the seven churches described by Christ in Revelation, the church of Rome isn't even mentioned.
We know, you hate little brown Americans. What a shame for you then that we have this:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Yeah except....
Many today assume the second half of the citizenship clause ("subject to the jurisdiction thereof") merely refers to the day-to-day laws to which we are all subject. But the original understanding referred to political allegiance. Being subject to U.S. jurisdiction meant, as then-Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Lyman Trumbull stated, "not owing allegiance to anybody else [but] subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States." The author of the provision, Sen. Jacob Merritt Howard of Michigan, pointed out that the jurisdiction language "will not, of course, include foreigners."
In that case, if an undocumented couple entered the US and set up a household while still "owing allegiance to a foreign power AND being subject to US jurisdiction means "not owing allegiance to anybody else [but] subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States", as you claim, then your argument fails on one or another level of your argument or both. Given the US Government does, indeed, have the jurisdiction to deport the undocumented individuals, or the breaking of other laws, or under Common Law.
According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.” The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday.
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening.
According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.
Birthright Citizenship Is a Magnet for Illegal Immigrants, and It Has Real Economic Costs | National Review Online
According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.” The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday.
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening.
According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.
Birthright Citizenship Is a Magnet for Illegal Immigrants, and It Has Real Economic Costs | National Review Online
Why should we consider the CIS a reliable source for accurate, objective statistics?
According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.” The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday.
Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening.
According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.
Birthright Citizenship Is a Magnet for Illegal Immigrants, and It Has Real Economic Costs | National Review Online
Why should we consider the CIS a reliable source for accurate, objective statistics?
Seemed that the House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security thought so!
