40 years ago

[Quantum Windbag]

In my lifetime I have seen a Republican President driven from office for using the power of his office in an clearly unconstitutional manner. I have seen another Republican President lie us into a war, and at the same time, ignore the existance of someone that masterminded the murder of 3000 Americans on American soil. In fact, even state publically that "Bin Laden is not a concern of mine". And he proved it, for Bin Laden had to wait for the election of a Democratic President before getting the justice he so richly deserved. This same Republican President left the nation in total economic shambles as he left office.

The prior Democratic President left him with a balanced budget, and a world in relitive peace. But he warned that Republican President of a clear and present danger in Bin Laden and Al Queda. A warning that was totally ignored and even ridiculed.

So now the present Democratic President has brought this nation out of what threatoned to become the Second Great Republican Depression, and the Market is at an all time high, and jobs are slowly coming back. So what is a good Republican to do? Why, create a scandal. Any scandal. And try to pin it on the present President. Alter e-mails, tell outright lies, do anything to slow or destroy the economy. And then make sure everyone knows that you are first and foremost a PATRIOT!!!!!!!!!!!. And you are only trying to destroy the nation for it's own good.

Actually, you didn't. Unless, that is, you live in an alternate universe. In this universe Nixon was driven from office for attempting to use the power of his office unconstitutionally. There is a small, but significant, difference.

I also challenge you to show any Republican president that lied us into war. Keep in mind that lying entails knowingly saying something false, not just being wrong. Which is why you are a liar, and Bush did not lie about Iraq. Also, anyone that thinks invading Afghanistan is the equivalent of ignoring bin Laden is so stupid they should be shot on sight.

It is interesting that you keep repeating the lie about what Bush said, yet defend the lies Obama says as truth. Like that line that the 2008 crash was on track to be another depression, and that we have totally recovered from it. That is one of Obama's more persistent lies, and you support it by lying about Bush.

By the way, this particular thread is about the IRS, not Obama. I actually made that clear in the OP, which you did not read. Instead you dropped in and lied about Bush in order to justify Obama being in charge of a government that would have followed Nixon's orders.

Interesting.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

This is the purpose of supply side economics. Reagan, Clinton, Junebug, Barry-O are all supply siders. The only difference between them is corporate sponsorship.

Fake liberals don't want to fix it. They do not have an acceptable vision for the nation.

Nutballs are in denial about Reagan and Junebug, so they can't fix it despite claiming to want to fix it because halfwits exist to do what they are told. The capture of halfwit America by religious nuts and the MIC in 1980 was a very bad thing indeed.

What did people expect? That is my question. The America that re elected Reagan and re elected Junebug is a despicably degenerate nation, not worth a god damn, and so deserves the economic fucking every president since Reagan has given it.

Nothing is going to change until the focus moves back toward policies expanding and maintaining a rock solid blue collar middle class.

This is not about being partisan. It is not about which economic theory is right or wrong. This thread is about the government.

Try to follow the bouncing ball.

 

[Redfish]

you are one sick puppy. miss your paxil last night? take a double tonight with a pint of vodka

He is barely coherent. At best. To call him a low information poster assumes he has some information at all.

Get a room, you two.

The love of a halfwit for his dimwit pal is so touching it seemed best to ensure no one posting in the thread needs to miss it.

just because two people agree that you are an idiot does not mean that they have anything in common besides good judgement.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

BS. Much ado about nothing. The IRS targeted liberal groups this time around and under George W. Bush, the NAACP. Apparently what's good for the goose, makes for outrage by the gander, when subjected to the same. Move on.

The IRS did no such thing, even the IRS admits that this is a first, and that it was wrong. Even if they did, that would not make it right, would it? Your defense of them is a defense of tyranny.

By the way, I thought you had me on ignore.

 

[The Rabbi]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

BS. Much ado about nothing. The IRS targeted liberal groups this time around and under George W. Bush, the NAACP. Apparently what's good for the goose, makes for outrage by the gander, when subjected to the same. Move on.

The IRS did no such thing, even the IRS admits that this is a first, and that it was wrong. Even if they did, that would not make it right, would it? Your defense of them is a defense of tyranny.

By the way, I thought you had me on ignore.

Poet manages to get his ass handed to him on every discussion. He's not low information. It's just that everything he knows is wrong.

 

[sfcalifornia]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Which branch of government decided who was going to win the election in 2012?

Did it go something like this?

CNN.com - U.S. Supreme Court rules manual vote recounts unconstitutional - December 13, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision that ordered about 170,000 votes recounted by hand to resolve the stalled presidential election -- a ruling benefiting Republican George W. Bush.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Which branch of government decided who was going to win the election in 2012?

Did it go something like this?

CNN.com - U.S. Supreme Court rules manual vote recounts unconstitutional - December 13, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision that ordered about 170,000 votes recounted by hand to resolve the stalled presidential election -- a ruling benefiting Republican George W. Bush.

There is a significant difference between the Supreme Court and the IRS.

 

[sfcalifornia]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Which branch of government decided who was going to win the election in 2012?

Did it go something like this?

CNN.com - U.S. Supreme Court rules manual vote recounts unconstitutional - December 13, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision that ordered about 170,000 votes recounted by hand to resolve the stalled presidential election -- a ruling benefiting Republican George W. Bush.

There is a significant difference between the Supreme Court and the IRS.

You didn't answer the question.

You said this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose.

So which branch of government decided who was going to win in 2012?

 

[oldfart]

When Obama leaves and the crazies find their grandkids going to a school named after him, how are they going to ever be able to cope.

Just like Clinton, they will remember his administration as the "Good Ol' Days" and take credit for it.

 

[sfcalifornia]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Which branch of government decided who was going to win the election in 2012?

Did it go something like this?

CNN.com - U.S. Supreme Court rules manual vote recounts unconstitutional - December 13, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision that ordered about 170,000 votes recounted by hand to resolve the stalled presidential election -- a ruling benefiting Republican George W. Bush.

There is a significant difference between the Supreme Court and the IRS.

In fact, not only did you not answer the question but you are also erroneously alluding to the claim that a handful of IRS employees comprises "the government" and that somehow these IRS employees determined the outcome of the election.

 

[Dugdale_Jukes]

He is barely coherent. At best. To call him a low information poster assumes he has some information at all.

Get a room, you two.

The love of a halfwit for his dimwit pal is so touching it seemed best to ensure no one posting in the thread needs to miss it.

just because two people agree that you are an idiot does not mean that they have anything in common besides good judgement.

Sure it doesn't.

 

[bodecea]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Where's Obama's "Saturday Nite Massacre"?

 

[The Rabbi]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Where's Obama's "Saturday Nite Massacre"?

There has to be a special prosecutor appointed first. But that will come later.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Most people who post on this board weren't around 40 years ago, and those of us that were don't remember all the details, but what happened then was rightly called a cancer on the presidency. Today we have something worse, something that makes Watergate look like a mild cold in comparison. What we have today is a cancer on the entire government, and the IRS targeting conservatives is just the tip of the iceberg.

The part that I really cannot comprehend is why everyone is not outraged by this. Obama says he is outraged, yet some people must think he is just pretending because they are upset this might reflect badly on him.

Guess what, it reflects badly on every single one of us. This is not about Obama, so stop defending him, this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose. This should offend every single person on the planet, and the fact that it doesn't should scare the crap out of those of us who understand what this means. Tyranny is not just something that might happen in this country, it is something that has already started, and we need to stomp it out now before it becomes so strong that we need to take up arms to defend ourselves.

Take up arms? You are insane.

Nobody would defend Obama if nutters did not falsely accuse him of wrongdoing and get thousands of hours of broadcast time to push the lie into the dense minds of 30% of the populace.

There is no tyranny in America. Stop it already.

I did not accuse Obama of anything in this thread, did I? That makes you part of the problem, and one of the people that will be fighting for tyranny and against freedom.

Asshole....I did not say you did. I responded to this comment made by you:

This is not about Obama, so stop defending him,

Fuck off. There is no tyranny and I will be one of the people punching it square in the mouth if it ever shows up here. You mother fuckers and your incessant whining about freedom lost.........in free and fair ELECTIONS.........need to get a grip.

 

[Redfish]

go away laugher, everyone has you on ignore, no one is reading your shit.

 

[Redfish]

Get a room, you two.

The love of a halfwit for his dimwit pal is so touching it seemed best to ensure no one posting in the thread needs to miss it.

just because two people agree that you are an idiot does not mean that they have anything in common besides good judgement.

Sure it doesn't.

is that you and your "wife" ?

 

[LoneLaugher]

go away laugher, everyone has you on ignore, no one is reading your shit.

They do?

 

[The Rabbi]

This message is hidden because LoneLaugher is on your ignore list.

Hmm.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Excellent.

Redfish and Rabbi. Anyone else want to openly admit being a pussy?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Which branch of government decided who was going to win the election in 2012?

Did it go something like this?

CNN.com - U.S. Supreme Court rules manual vote recounts unconstitutional - December 13, 2000

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The U.S. Supreme Court late Tuesday overturned a Florida Supreme Court decision that ordered about 170,000 votes recounted by hand to resolve the stalled presidential election -- a ruling benefiting Republican George W. Bush.

There is a significant difference between the Supreme Court and the IRS.

You didn't answer the question.

You said this is about the government choosing who is going to win and who is going to lose.

So which branch of government decided who was going to win in 2012?

Actually, I did. The Supreme Court did not chose who won the election, despite your paranoid delusions. Every single recount came to the same conclusion, no matter who paid for it. The Supreme Court only got involved because the Florida State Supreme Court was trying to rewrite election law, which the Constitution puts entirely in the hands of each states electorate.

The IRS, on the other hand, works for Obama.