44% of Americans don't have $400 in case there is an emergency

[deanrd]

That's the same number who are on government assistance.
https://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
Dems welfare programs makes it almost impossible for them to save.
They only get enough government assistance that covers 3 weeks out of 4 weeks.

Trump is right ,you help them get out of welfare.

Oh, come on. Republicans don't like any kind of assistance. They want people to starve white away.
Just like their healthcare plan.



It was those poor that put Trump in office.

Tell me how much that "free" lunch program actually costs.

The problem is that if it's government run it will cost far more than it needs to.

If a school wants to give away ham sandwiches, bananas and milk to kids for lunch the fucking government would tell them they can't do it.

Yea, because there is nothing like a hardworking 8 year old.

 

[deanrd]

OP lies.

What reality does when it catches up to your kind:

 

[Moonglow]

That's the same number who are on government assistance.
https://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
Dems welfare programs makes it almost impossible for them to save.
They only get enough government assistance that covers 3 weeks out of 4 weeks.

Trump is right ,you help them get out of welfare.

or give them more.The republican way..

How about getting them out?

Out to where the jobs are?

 

[Wyatt earp]

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

Last year, the rate of job growth was the slowest in the seven previous years.

I haven't had a chance to watch the SOTU. I recorded it. But I have been watching these facts thrown out on news channels.

Wow, as the facts come out, it looks like Trump needs to work a little harder.

I also recorded the rebuttal.

Did did Trump talk about bringing the country together?

Did he talk about building a future together?

Did he have a vision for the country of prosperity and equality?

Did he talk about us being a nation of immigrants and talk about his own immigrant family?

Did he talk about keeping families together?

I can't wait to see his plans to unify the nation.

And you think they have 6 grand when Obama care raised deductibles up from 2 grand to 6 grand????

 

[jasonnfree]

Found an aricle on welfare for the rich, since the hard core right seems to focus it's hatred only on the poor who get government help.

arhttps://www.quora.com/What-are-some-examples-of-socialism-for-the-rich-and-capitalism-for-the-poore getting help from the government.

 

[peach174]

Found an aricle on welfare for the rich, since the hard core right seems to focus it's hatred only on the poor who get government help.

arhttps://www.quora.com/What-are-some-examples-of-socialism-for-the-rich-and-capitalism-for-the-poore getting help from the government.

What hate on the poor?
Getting gangs out of neighborhoods?
Focusing on education.
Helping them to go to colleges?

 

[deanrd]

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

Last year, the rate of job growth was the slowest in the seven previous years.

I haven't had a chance to watch the SOTU. I recorded it. But I have been watching these facts thrown out on news channels.

Wow, as the facts come out, it looks like Trump needs to work a little harder.

I also recorded the rebuttal.

Did did Trump talk about bringing the country together?

Did he talk about building a future together?

Did he have a vision for the country of prosperity and equality?

Did he talk about us being a nation of immigrants and talk about his own immigrant family?

Did he talk about keeping families together?

I can't wait to see his plans to unify the nation.

And you think they have 6 grand when Obama care raised deductibles up from 2 grand to 6 grand????

That never happened to me.

In fact, the states that complained that they only had one carrier had none before Obamacare.

 

[westwall]

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

Last year, the rate of job growth was the slowest in the seven previous years.

I haven't had a chance to watch the SOTU. I recorded it. But I have been watching these facts thrown out on news channels.

Wow, as the facts come out, it looks like Trump needs to work a little harder.

I also recorded the rebuttal.

Did did Trump talk about bringing the country together?

Did he talk about building a future together?

Did he have a vision for the country of prosperity and equality?

Did he talk about us being a nation of immigrants and talk about his own immigrant family?

Did he talk about keeping families together?

I can't wait to see his plans to unify the nation.

THANKS OBAMA!

 

[deanrd]

Found an aricle on welfare for the rich, since the hard core right seems to focus it's hatred only on the poor who get government help.

arhttps://www.quora.com/What-are-some-examples-of-socialism-for-the-rich-and-capitalism-for-the-poore getting help from the government.

What hate on the poor?
Getting gangs out of neighborhoods?
Focusing on education.
Helping them to go to colleges?

Helping them go to colleges????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Even you don't believe that.

The majority of Republicans say colleges are bad for America (yes, really)

 

[Wyatt earp]

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

Last year, the rate of job growth was the slowest in the seven previous years.

I haven't had a chance to watch the SOTU. I recorded it. But I have been watching these facts thrown out on news channels.

Wow, as the facts come out, it looks like Trump needs to work a little harder.

I also recorded the rebuttal.

Did did Trump talk about bringing the country together?

Did he talk about building a future together?

Did he have a vision for the country of prosperity and equality?

Did he talk about us being a nation of immigrants and talk about his own immigrant family?

Did he talk about keeping families together?

I can't wait to see his plans to unify the nation.

And you think they have 6 grand when Obama care raised deductibles up from 2 grand to 6 grand????

That never happened to me.

In fact, the states that complained that they only had one carrier had none before Obamacare.

So let's get this straight you post a thread only 67% of Americans have $400 bucks yet claim they can afford 6 thousand dollars in deductibles?

You don't see how i burned you here?

 

[peach174]

Found an aricle on welfare for the rich, since the hard core right seems to focus it's hatred only on the poor who get government help.

arhttps://www.quora.com/What-are-some-examples-of-socialism-for-the-rich-and-capitalism-for-the-poore getting help from the government.

What hate on the poor?
Getting gangs out of neighborhoods?
Focusing on education.
Helping them to go to colleges?

Helping them go to colleges????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Even you don't believe that.

The majority of Republicans say colleges are bad for America (yes, really)

Technical schools also.
You can stay in the dark if you want.

 

[Manonthestreet]

My 19yr old daughter has multiple times that working part time.....only 19 AND IN THE TOP 25% ALRDY....

 

[peach174]

That's the same number who are on government assistance.
https://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/
Dems welfare programs makes it almost impossible for them to save.
They only get enough government assistance that covers 3 weeks out of 4 weeks.

Trump is right ,you help them get out of welfare.

or give them more.The republican way..

How about getting them out?

Out to where the jobs are?

Out of poverty.

 

[deanrd]

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

Last year, the rate of job growth was the slowest in the seven previous years.

I haven't had a chance to watch the SOTU. I recorded it. But I have been watching these facts thrown out on news channels.

Wow, as the facts come out, it looks like Trump needs to work a little harder.

I also recorded the rebuttal.

Did did Trump talk about bringing the country together?

Did he talk about building a future together?

Did he have a vision for the country of prosperity and equality?

Did he talk about us being a nation of immigrants and talk about his own immigrant family?

Did he talk about keeping families together?

I can't wait to see his plans to unify the nation.

And you think they have 6 grand when Obama care raised deductibles up from 2 grand to 6 grand????

That never happened to me.

In fact, the states that complained that they only had one carrier had none before Obamacare.

So let's get this straight you post a thread only 67% of Americans have $400 bucks yet claim they can afford 6 thousand dollars in deductibles?

You don't see how i burned you here?

The first line of the first post:

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

And you said you burned me when you can't even fuking read?

I was bored. You gave me someone to laugh at and not feel guilt.
Thanks

 

[peach174]

No one said it was.

67% of Americans don't have a thousand dollars in the bank.

That's the same number who are on government assistance.
https://www.statisticbrain.com/welfare-statistics/

"Total number of Americans receiving welfare government assistance 67,891,000"

The only number you could have been talking about is the 67%. Deanrd only posted one number in his OP. The FIRST thing you said was "That's the same number" then you posted a source to back this up which said 67 million.

I'm sorry if you think no one said that. But you said that.

I'm sorry if you can't distinguish the difference in the types of government assistance.

Doesn't really matter whether I can or I can't.

67% of the US is 217 million people.

The source you provided said the TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE RECEIVING WELFARE GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE is 67 million.

So, there are not more than 67 million people on government assistance.

Even if you take the 67 million people of government assistance and add them to the "DOES NOT INCLUDE the 70.5 million people enrolled in Medicaid" 70.5 million people, you still don't even get 140 million people. Now, some of these people actually be the same people anyway.

So where the fuck in the source that YOU PROVIDED do you manage to get up to 217 million people?

I mean, even if you add up the total number of people, plus the number of people on food stamps (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and the number of people getting unemployment (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add up the other three categories (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add them to the people getting medicare, and then imagine that one person getting all three is actually THREE PEOPLE, you STILL do not get to 217 million people, or 67% of the population.

So, please, explain what the fuck you are talking about.

The title of the thread.

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

 

[frigidweirdo]

"Total number of Americans receiving welfare government assistance 67,891,000"

The only number you could have been talking about is the 67%. Deanrd only posted one number in his OP. The FIRST thing you said was "That's the same number" then you posted a source to back this up which said 67 million.

I'm sorry if you think no one said that. But you said that.

I'm sorry if you can't distinguish the difference in the types of government assistance.

Doesn't really matter whether I can or I can't.

67% of the US is 217 million people.

The source you provided said the TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE RECEIVING WELFARE GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE is 67 million.

So, there are not more than 67 million people on government assistance.

Even if you take the 67 million people of government assistance and add them to the "DOES NOT INCLUDE the 70.5 million people enrolled in Medicaid" 70.5 million people, you still don't even get 140 million people. Now, some of these people actually be the same people anyway.

So where the fuck in the source that YOU PROVIDED do you manage to get up to 217 million people?

I mean, even if you add up the total number of people, plus the number of people on food stamps (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and the number of people getting unemployment (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add up the other three categories (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add them to the people getting medicare, and then imagine that one person getting all three is actually THREE PEOPLE, you STILL do not get to 217 million people, or 67% of the population.

So, please, explain what the fuck you are talking about.

The title of the thread.

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

Then, after I don't know how many posts, tell me your perspective? Because it would appear, right now, that your perspective is what you WANT TO SEE and not what's there.

 

[peach174]

I'm sorry if you can't distinguish the difference in the types of government assistance.

Doesn't really matter whether I can or I can't.

67% of the US is 217 million people.

The source you provided said the TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE RECEIVING WELFARE GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE is 67 million.

So, there are not more than 67 million people on government assistance.

Even if you take the 67 million people of government assistance and add them to the "DOES NOT INCLUDE the 70.5 million people enrolled in Medicaid" 70.5 million people, you still don't even get 140 million people. Now, some of these people actually be the same people anyway.

So where the fuck in the source that YOU PROVIDED do you manage to get up to 217 million people?

I mean, even if you add up the total number of people, plus the number of people on food stamps (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and the number of people getting unemployment (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add up the other three categories (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add them to the people getting medicare, and then imagine that one person getting all three is actually THREE PEOPLE, you STILL do not get to 217 million people, or 67% of the population.

So, please, explain what the fuck you are talking about.

The title of the thread.

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

Then, after I don't know how many posts, tell me your perspective? Because it would appear, right now, that your perspective is what you WANT TO SEE and not what's there.

Well a whole bunch got it, why can't you?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Doesn't really matter whether I can or I can't.

67% of the US is 217 million people.

The source you provided said the TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE RECEIVING WELFARE GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE is 67 million.

So, there are not more than 67 million people on government assistance.

Even if you take the 67 million people of government assistance and add them to the "DOES NOT INCLUDE the 70.5 million people enrolled in Medicaid" 70.5 million people, you still don't even get 140 million people. Now, some of these people actually be the same people anyway.

So where the fuck in the source that YOU PROVIDED do you manage to get up to 217 million people?

I mean, even if you add up the total number of people, plus the number of people on food stamps (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and the number of people getting unemployment (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add up the other three categories (who happen to also be in the total number of people) and add them to the people getting medicare, and then imagine that one person getting all three is actually THREE PEOPLE, you STILL do not get to 217 million people, or 67% of the population.

So, please, explain what the fuck you are talking about.

The title of the thread.

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

Then, after I don't know how many posts, tell me your perspective? Because it would appear, right now, that your perspective is what you WANT TO SEE and not what's there.

Well a whole bunch got it, why can't you?

Okay, another post and another lack of explanation.

So, you made it up, and now you're trying to ride the time until I get bored and just ignore you then?

You have nothing. You're bullshitting and it's pretty clear you are. Not one figure matches what you said. Not one.

You took 67% and 67 million and tried to make them the same. But you have too much pride to admit a mistake.

 

[peach174]

The title of the thread.

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

Then, after I don't know how many posts, tell me your perspective? Because it would appear, right now, that your perspective is what you WANT TO SEE and not what's there.

Well a whole bunch got it, why can't you?

Okay, another post and another lack of explanation.

So, you made it up, and now you're trying to ride the time until I get bored and just ignore you then?

You have nothing. You're bullshitting and it's pretty clear you are. Not one figure matches what you said. Not one.

You took 67% and 67 million and tried to make them the same. But you have too much pride to admit a mistake.

You looked at only the 67% and not the 44% of which I was referring.
You are looking at numbers.
I'm looking at the 44% who has only $400.00 in savings which can be within any part of the welfare programs.
Others got it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Well, 44% of Americans... and you post something with 20% of Americans.... yeah, I'm still not getting it.......

Unless of course you're adding up those people and the people getting medicare, which are probably some of the same people, so you still don't get 44%.

Why?

Well, Medicaid is for poor people, low income people, the sort of people who are on government benefits because they're disabled and what not.

You still don't get to 44%.

We are looking at it from different perspectives.
Your looking at it literally with exact numbers.
I'm looking at it in generalization.
The 44% within any number of the programs, not all.

Then, after I don't know how many posts, tell me your perspective? Because it would appear, right now, that your perspective is what you WANT TO SEE and not what's there.

Well a whole bunch got it, why can't you?

Okay, another post and another lack of explanation.

So, you made it up, and now you're trying to ride the time until I get bored and just ignore you then?

You have nothing. You're bullshitting and it's pretty clear you are. Not one figure matches what you said. Not one.

You took 67% and 67 million and tried to make them the same. But you have too much pride to admit a mistake.

You looked at only the 67% and not the 44% of which I was referring.
You are looking at numbers.
I'm looking at the 44% who has only $400.00 in savings which can be within any part of the welfare programs.
Others got it.

You explained this already. I got it. What I don't get is how this 44% relates to those people on welfare. You said it was the same number. I can't find the same number anywhere. Where is it? You posted a source that said 20% of people are on welfare.