5-4 Again - DOMA Unconstitutional

[Wry Catcher]

Cool. Equal Protection of the law is upheld (though four 'justices' felt otherwise).

 

[Wry Catcher]

See for details:

http://www.scotusblog.com/

 

[novasteve]

Of course equal protection was bad when it came to the voting rights act decision to treat all states equally. That's bad

 

[Big Black Dog]

More government pandering to the queers.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Of course equal protection was bad when it came to the voting rights act decision to treat all states equally. That's bad

You're really not very bright. Voting is a right, for all citizens; marriage was not.

 

[freedombecki]

Who voted which way against the people's vote in the Great State of California?​

The Ten Commandments at the top of the SCOTUS Building​

Why is the Supreme Court shoving the people's will around?​

Why are evil people in the United States Congress allowing this bullshit of SCOTUS Legislation against all that is good to families and human development? Why? Why? Why?​

 

[freedombecki]

Anthony Kennedy, appointed by Gerald Ford, jumped ship on beating up the law the people passed in DOMA in California and other states. He doesn't give a rat's ass about what the people voted for with a huge majority as don't Ruth Ginsburg Bader, Stephen breyer, Sonia Sotomeyer, and Elena Kegan. They knifed the majority of the American people.

I take a quote from the Declaration of Independence:

to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.
He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

My question about the Democrat's stranglehold on the court against the people voting for something they want to stop causing them a headache, is how much more are the people willing to put up with?

This court reached into people's religion and told them they can't worship in churches that "discriminate" against things and persons who defy God's laws. This court reached into people's homes and told them they can't teach their children right and wrong ways about sexuality. This court is paving the pathway to absolute societal chaos, and we came out of that kind of chaos when we left Europe, who also went apeshit on all that's good, promoting all that's bad against the people, including major luxuries for those who coddle leadership and ignore the people.

I don't think it's smart for a Supreme Court to ignore laws made by the people for screwed up thinking that is ona tear to destroy people's Christian beliefs with mockery, hatred, and laws rubbing people's faces in behaviors so evil they were discussed at length in the Bible and in the New Testament.

This defies everything I know about the Ten Commandments and the proverb that says "When there is bad leadership in the country, the people weep."

Thanks, you idiot Supremes who want everybody to be gay, and heterosexuals in the majority who cannot stomach these practices will wind up like this--women weeping because all the men are gay or so irresponsible they will not claim their own children except by proof of paternity and DNA testing, and not because they are principled by love so great it doesn't need a ball and chain to make them support children.

And you, Supreme Court, bear the weight for Jeremiah Wrights' sermon

GOD DAMN AMERICA

coming true. You have damned America to an unthinkable future of butt sex and strapons. You are a disgrace to humanity, and your decision today sickens decent people who did all they could to insure that their children would not have this kind of garbage coming their way by YOUR PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL CRAP foisted on the man and woman on the street who are already beleaguered by venereal diseases because YOU DECIDED it was okay for women to abort their baby and relieve themselves of the consequences of bringing forth a new generation.

We need to abolish the court as legislators and anything else that costs exorbitant taxes idiot decisions inflict on taxpayers.

Legislation and taxation is Congress' job, damn it, and it says so in the Constitution!!!

Oh, yeah, I forgot to say:

/rant

 

[Wry Catcher]

More government pandering to the queers.

I guess you need to prove you're an asshole, a bigot and a jerk. All done successfully with only three dozen key strokes.

 

[TheOldSchool]

GOD DAMN AMERICA

coming true. You have damned America to an unthinkable future of butt sex and strapons. You are a disgrace to humanity, and your decision today sickens decent people who did all they could to insure that their children would not have this kind of garbage coming their way by YOUR PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL CRAP foisted on the man and woman on the street

Don't you think that's a bit much? You don't have to buy strap-on's and have "butt sex" if you don't want to.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Cool. Equal Protection of the law is upheld (though four 'justices' felt otherwise).

And of course when it is 5-4 against your position it is a bad decision, right? Cause after all you Libs know everything, right?