Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,353
- 81,200
- 2,635
And by âbiased,â you mean accurate assments you donât like.So just go with extreme left biased sources? No thanks. I don't buy their steady diet of propaganda BS.Youre not going to get very far using far right sites for critique of snopes.Fact-Checking Snopes: Websiteâs Political âFact-Checker ...Whatâs not to love? Righties can never show Snopes is wrong. Shaking your cane at them certainly doesnât.
https://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites...
Snopesâ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that â oddly enough â is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.
EXPOSED - Guess Who is REALLY Behind Snopes.com?
www.angrypatriotmovement.com/who-is-behind-snopes
But Lacapria simply joins the very small crew at Snopes who have existed as bias from the start. David and Barbara Mikkelson, the founders and proprietors of Snopes, have been found on many occasions to have âerredâ on the side of the truth best benefiting the Leftâs narrative on issues.
Daily Caller far right bias, factual reporting: mixed
Angry Patriot is even worse; extreme right conspiracy
![]()
No, assments are your typical comments.
![boohoo :boohoo: :boohoo:](/styles/smilies/boohoo.gif)