500 scientists say there is no climate emergency

Because it will show just how much the planet's landmass and ocean circulation system is uniquely configured for COLDER temperatures and climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty. As well as what the true catastrophic risk is to mankind from climate changes which is colder temperatures and not warmer temperatures.
 
All of this will free climate scientists from their current bondage and allegiance to AGW and will give them a new crisis to justify their jobs and grants. They will be free to criticize the past narrative of AGW and will find plenty of evidence to discuss using the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.
 
Liar. You have never read a word of it.
You mean the one where they claim humans have unequivocally caused climate change?
There has been no scientific data that has said unequivocally......only things like 'may' or 'could' be 'linked'.

Get with it.

428px-PosterBullshitMan2_400x400-469967222.jpeg
 
And there is the proof you have never read a word of it

Just give liars all the rope they need. The will just expose themselves.
So you didn't read it is what you're saying?

That is one of their findings from it.........there are more bizarre claims......:eusa_doh:
 
So you didn't read it is what you're saying?

That is one of their findings from it.........there are more bizarre claims......:eusa_doh:
You didn't read it, is what you are saying, with your weird lies.

You can stop. You aren't fooling anyone.
 
I would have to say the funniest moment in the history of the climate science denial industry was when the Kochs funded a climate study they hoped would undermine the consensus. It was pretty expensive.

Naturally, the study confirmed the already existing consensus of the evidence.

Good stuff.
You can't prove that.
 
You mean the one where they claim humans have unequivocally caused climate change?
There has been no scientific data that has said unequivocally......only things like 'may' or 'could' be 'linked'.

Get with it.

View attachment 854914
The IPCC's Physical Science Basis, Summary for Policy Makers, uses the term twice in its introduction: speaking first of human causation of temperature increase and then of rising carbon dioxide. "Unequivocal"
 
Last edited:
And why a lie and not just wrong? How would the collapse of the AMOC show that he had been lied to? And why would it go in that direction anyway? I would have said that the collapse of the AMOC would show YOU that everything YOU believe on this topic is false. The AMOC will have stopped with no change in the glacial/interglacial cycle, no change in the tectonic configuration of the planet, no change in the thermal isolation of either pole. Why do you think the collapse of the AMOC would help your side in this debate?
It's funny that you don't understand the significance and consequence of the collapse of the AMOC.

It will show just how much the planet's landmass and ocean circulation system is uniquely configured for COLDER temperatures and climate fluctuations and environmental uncertainty. As well as what the true catastrophic risk is to mankind from climate changes which is colder temperatures and not warmer temperatures.

It will free climate scientists from their current bondage and allegiance to AGW and will give them a new crisis to justify their jobs and grants. They will be free to criticize the past narrative of AGW and will find plenty of evidence to discuss using the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record.

Your world will crumble around your feet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top