Bullshit Alert! NIST said it!At least you're willing to admit that the jet fuel burned up in minutes, certainly not enough time to weaken massive steel beams...
Straw Man alert!
No one said it was the jet fuel that destroyed the horizontal beam's connections to their vertical supports. Stop playing amateur physicist here and get busy compiling your case, Princess. There's big bucks, fame and glory awaiting those who can recover that insurance money.![]()
FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation
I'm still awaiting PM of your personal info but I'm having serious doubts as to your ability to argue ANY case.(1) the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns, dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, and widely dispersed jet fuel over multiple floors; and (2) the subsequent unusually large number of jet-fuel ignited multi-floor fires (which reached temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius, or 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) significantly weakened the floors and columns with dislodged fireproofing to the point where floors sagged and pulled inward on the perimeter columns. This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers.
Dayam. You're waaay too stupid to play with a computer. Your source clearly states the fires which damaged the structure were ignited by the jet fuel. No where does it state that the jet fuel brought down the buildings. You continue to prove why, after 11 years of Internet braying, not one CT has been strong enough to make a winable civil court case. You'll are just too stupid but thanks for playin'.