eots
no fly list
what reason ?Fire. Keep asking the same question and you will keep getting the same answer.
so it is your contention that fire and controlled demolition are the two
scenarios that will create a free fall collapse of a steel framed building ?
How many "high rise" buildings did you expect to find in Germany in WWII? The point is that if steel framed buildings can collapse due to fire, why not high rise steel framed buildings?eots said:so you disagree with NIST and their assertion this was the first steel framed hi-rise to of ever collapsed primarily due to fire ?
What we found was that uncontrolled building fires—similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings—caused an extraordinary event, the collapse of World Trade Center 7.
This is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires.
NIST and the World Trade Center : News and Events
.So I am just to take the word of a truthtard over those who experienced the clean up of ground zero? I don't think so. I barely know you but already I know you lie your ass off
what testimony from those at ground zero do you speak of ? any links ? quotes ?
They had that in steel that was warped due to heat. They didn't need everything to stay at ground zero to look for steel that had suffered heat deformation. In fact, it was a lot easier to find the different parts when the steel was moved to Fresh Kills and organized / examined.
In truthtard speak that means since they didn't specifically state they had samples of steel that suffered the heat they claimed, then obviously they had no such samples. The fire temperatures they were talking about are EASILY reached in a standard office fire. Of course, truthtards ignore that little fact. They like to pretend the fires were nice, cool affairs.
thats just your own rambling
.Because the only people claiming gross error are truthtards without any evidence
so the former lead fire investigator for NIST is a truthtard ???
First responders knowingly go into dangerous situations. You actually expect us to believe "they" told the first responders that ground zero was safe?!?
Wow. Are you ever gullible! Would you consider walking around on piles
of loose debris looking for bodies "safe"? Would you believe anyone that told you it was?
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxdttHY59b4[/ame]
eots said:SO If...you read all of the testimony you must simply discount all the first responder testimony that contradicts the official theory...why ?And which first responder testimony is that? Is this where you pretend every first responder who claims they heard an explosion really heard explosives?![]()
NIST says there were no explosions as loud a a shotgun blast heard or reported by anyone...this is untrue
So you expect a computer model to PERFECTLY simulate reality. Wow! You're not up on chaos theory, are you. One cannot perfectly model an event such as the collapse of WTC 7 because of the millions of variables that can affect the outcome of the collapse. What they did was build a model that showed a possible way for the collapse to initiate given all the facts known. Is it an absolute fact it happened that way? No. It could have been different. Unfortunately for you truthtards, the evidence does NOT support a controlled demolition as one of the means of collapse initiation.eots said:I can compare the two and see the do not match
chaos theory.. lol...give it up the model accurate or its not
Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report
NIST used computer models that they said have never been used in such an application before and are the state of the art. For this they should be commended for their skill. But the validation of these modeling results is in question. Others have computed aspects with different conclusions on the cause mechanism of the collapse. Moreover, it is common in fire investigation to compute a time-line and compare it to known events. NIST has not done that.
OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
Last edited: