911 WTC 7 Silent Thermate Demolition, Debunkers Grab Your Ankles!

[Skylar]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.

But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.

When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.

Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

 

[SAYIT]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

 

[jon_berzerk]

an inability to deal with reality mostly

 

[SAYIT]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Just wondering ... the only way the CD theory works - even if one ignores the lack of any evidence of such - is if the perps could predict exactly where those planes would hit the towers.
How could anyone know exactly where those planes would hit?

 

[SAYIT]

an inability to deal with reality mostly

Yeah, I've read that but sometimes I think it's something more.

 

[jon_berzerk]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Just wondering ... the only way the CD theory works - even if one ignores the lack of any evidence of such - is if the perps could predict exactly where those planes would hit the towers.
How could anyone know exactly where those planes would hit?

that should have been obvious

because the the huge black X marked

on each building

 

[jon_berzerk]

an inability to deal with reality mostly

Yeah, I've read that but sometimes I think it's something more.

true it is more

some people can not deal with the fact that a few people

or in some cases one person could do such horrible things

so they assign governmental conspiracies

in a way of dealing with it

 

[Skylar]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

 

[n0spam4me]

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

The above can be applied to those who support the fanatical hijacker conspiracy bit also. and it only applies to some of the people, some of the time.

 

[Faun]

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

The above can be applied to those who support the fanatical hijacker conspiracy bit also. and it only applies to some of the people, some of the time.

ummm ... not for nothin', but ... that 'fanatical hijacker conspiracy' has thousands upon thousands of eye witnesses; whereas the revered truther versions remain cemented in a combustible mixture of conjecture and hallucinations.

 

[daws101]

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

The above can be applied to those who support the fanatical hijacker conspiracy bit also. and it only applies to some of the people, some of the time.

for ,you it would be all the time.

 

[daws101]

guess koko got tossed off the necrophilia thread again!

 

[KokomoJojo]

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

The above can be applied to those who support the fanatical hijacker conspiracy bit also. and it only applies to some of the people, some of the time.

ummm ... not for nothin', but ... that 'fanatical hijacker conspiracy' has thousands upon thousands of eye witnesses; whereas the revered truther versions remain cemented in a combustible mixture of conjecture and hallucinations.

wtf you smokin?

post the names of these witnesses and validations.

 

[KokomoJojo]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

problem is you havent punched holes in anything I posted, if you think you have by all means cite them and I will be happy to explain the facts to you.

 

[KokomoJojo]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

truther arguments arent very silly when you continually wind up with your ass handed to you.

 

[KokomoJojo]

an inability to deal with reality mostly

Yeah, I've read that but sometimes I think it's something more.

true it is more

some people can not deal with the fact that a few people

or in some cases one person could do such horrible things

so they assign governmental conspiracies

in a way of dealing with it

read the footer below, pshychologists warn us that posers/debunkers/huggers are bat shit crazy losers.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

problem is you havent punched holes in anything I posted, if you think you have by all means cite them and I will be happy to explain the facts to you.

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

 

[KokomoJojo]

none if they worked properly, since they self consume

The device in your video doesn't self consume.
Try again?

no shit! LOL



do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents? LOL

Just imagine how kick ass the real mcCoy is now that we have seen a kid who built one that works that good out of shit from his back yard scrap heap eh!

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.

But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.

When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.

Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

you are confused as usual. try to sort it all out next time;.

 

[KokomoJojo]

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

problem is you havent punched holes in anything I posted, if you think you have by all means cite them and I will be happy to explain the facts to you.

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

scratch you off the credible demolition knowledge list.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don't worry yourself with such details as 'self consuming'. Koko has a completely different thermite diagram to show you of a completely different 'cutter' that supposed to self consume. Its not actually a cutter, but an igniter. And it can't even remotely cut through a girder.
But when you point this out, Koko will go back to the original cutter. That doesn't self consume.
When you point this out, Koko returns to the self consuming model that doesn't cut shit.
Brainwash. Rinse. Repeat.

So what do you think it is? You've been observing the nature and methods of these 9/11 "Truthers." What drives them to make such silly arguments and half-baked conclusions?

They've internalized their conspiracy. They've Jack Burton'd their narrative. And made their imagined ability to 'see what no one else can see, do what no one else can do' part of their identity.

So if you point out holes in their theories, they get wildly defensive or evasive. As you're essentially attacking a piece of who they are. Equally, they need to perpetuate their stories to maintain this feeling of having 'special knowledge'.

Which is why most 'Truthers' are so invulnerable to contrary evidence. Acknowledging the holes in their theory is often seen as a personal failure or an almost blasphemous attack. As if you were talking shit about their religion. They shut down. And they will ignore anything, from any source, even their own....that contradicts their narrative.

problem is you havent punched holes in anything I posted, if you think you have by all means cite them and I will be happy to explain the facts to you.

do you think that maybe its because the kid who built it in his back yard didnt construct it according to the patents?

No. I think its because there would have to be tens of thousands, hundreds of which would have been dislodged by the planes crashing into the towers. And because the patented version wouldn't even self consume.

scratch you off the credible demolition knowledge list.

Idiot says what?