Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you realize how many IPCC scientists are nothing more then liberal lapdogs
I'll find you another source there are liek 10 of them
I'll find you another source there are liek 10 of them
"demanddebate" is an anti- climate change organization that is trying to undermine the accepted science in the area. Do you know who funds it? Who are the "scientists" on whose behalf they rely on for "debate"?
I'm not certain why it's so hard to believe that we contribute to climate change and it's our responsibility to be better caretakers of our planet. Is common sense in such short supply?
No one argues we need to be more enviormentally sound...what the arguement is we are the sole cause that the planet is warming and we are all ging to die soon if nothing changes...when it's all a fucking farce and scare tactic.
IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming
Climate scientists allied with the IPCC have been caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating, a shocking example of mass public deception that could spell the beginning of the end for the acceptance of man-made climate change theories.
On Monday, NASAs Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), run by Al Gores chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.
This was startling, reports the London Telegraph. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. Chinas official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its worst snowstorm ever. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.
It soon came to light that the data produced by NASA to make the claim, and in particular temperature records covering large areas of Russia, was merely carried over from the previous month. NASA had used temperature records from the naturally hotter month of September and claimed they represented temperature figures in October.
When NASA was confronted with this glaring error, they then attempted to compensate for the lower temperatures in Russia by claiming they had discovered a new hotspot in the Arctic, despite satellite imagery clearly showing that Arctic sea ice had massively expanded its coverage by 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, since summer 2007.
The figures published by Dr Hansens institute are one of the primary sets of data used by the IPCC to promote its case for man-made global warming and they are widely quoted because they consistently show higher temperatures than other figures.
Yet last weeks latest episode is far from the first time Dr Hansens methodology has been called in question, reports the Telegraph. In 2007 he was forced by Mr Watts and Mr McIntyre to revise his published figures for US surface temperatures, to show that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he had claimed, but the 1930s.
No one argues we need to be more enviormentally sound...what the arguement is we are the sole cause that the planet is warming and we are all ging to die soon if nothing changes...when it's all a fucking farce and scare tactic.
I've never heard anyone argue that we are the SOLE cause. But it is time to stop ignoring our responsibility.
As for anyone who would say we're the sole cause, I'd kind of see the difference between them and me as being the difference between a PETA loony and someone who is for animal conservation.
Maybe if people stop politicizing this we'd get to just do what's right. It's time to start getting energy independent anyway, simply as a security matter. I, personally, would like to stop us sending money to countries that distribute the money to people who hate us and want to blow us up.
just sayin'
No one argues we need to be more enviormentally sound...what the arguement is we are the sole cause that the planet is warming and we are all ging to die soon if nothing changes...when it's all a fucking farce and scare tactic.
No one argues we need to be more enviormentally sound...what the arguement is we are the sole cause that the planet is warming and we are all ging to die soon if nothing changes...when it's all a fucking farce and scare tactic.
First, the arguement is that the GHGs that we are putting into the atmosphere is the primary driver, not the only one. Strawman number one. Strawman number two. No, we are not all going to die. But, down the road, and we do not yet know have far, is an adrupt climate change if we stay on the present course. And a great many of the population then alive will die.
What is a fucking farce is people like yourself that comment without the least idea of the subject on which you are commenting. You are sitting in front of the greatest research tool ever devised by man, and do not seem to have the least idea of how to use it.
No one argues we need to be more enviormentally sound...what the arguement is we are the sole cause that the planet is warming and we are all ging to die soon if nothing changes...when it's all a fucking farce and scare tactic.
First, the arguement is that the GHGs that we are putting into the atmosphere is the primary driver, not the only one. Strawman number one. Strawman number two. No, we are not all going to die. But, down the road, and we do not yet know have far, is an adrupt climate change if we stay on the present course. And a great many of the population then alive will die.
What is a fucking farce is people like yourself that comment without the least idea of the subject on which you are commenting. You are sitting in front of the greatest research tool ever devised by man, and do not seem to have the least idea of how to use it.
you should try to be more condescending.
it really strengthens your argument.
IPCC Scientists Caught Producing False Data To Push Global Warming
Climate scientists allied with the IPCC have been caught citing fake data to make the case that global warming is accelerating, a shocking example of mass public deception that could spell the beginning of the end for the acceptance of man-made climate change theories.
On Monday, NASAs Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), run by Al Gores chief scientific ally, Dr James Hansen, announced that last month was the hottest October on record.
This was startling, reports the London Telegraph. Across the world there were reports of unseasonal snow and plummeting temperatures last month, from the American Great Plains to China, and from the Alps to New Zealand. Chinas official news agency reported that Tibet had suffered its worst snowstorm ever. In the US, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration registered 63 local snowfall records and 115 lowest-ever temperatures for the month, and ranked it as only the 70th-warmest October in 114 years.
It soon came to light that the data produced by NASA to make the claim, and in particular temperature records covering large areas of Russia, was merely carried over from the previous month. NASA had used temperature records from the naturally hotter month of September and claimed they represented temperature figures in October.
When NASA was confronted with this glaring error, they then attempted to compensate for the lower temperatures in Russia by claiming they had discovered a new hotspot in the Arctic, despite satellite imagery clearly showing that Arctic sea ice had massively expanded its coverage by 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, since summer 2007.
The figures published by Dr Hansens institute are one of the primary sets of data used by the IPCC to promote its case for man-made global warming and they are widely quoted because they consistently show higher temperatures than other figures.
Yet last weeks latest episode is far from the first time Dr Hansens methodology has been called in question, reports the Telegraph. In 2007 he was forced by Mr Watts and Mr McIntyre to revise his published figures for US surface temperatures, to show that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s, as he had claimed, but the 1930s.
And this is why I have been saying throughout this thread that NASA is not a reputable source on this issue. James Hansen ought to be sitting in the Federal Pen right next to Robert Hanssen and for about the same thing. Selling out his country.
get what they need.First, the arguement is that the GHGs that we are putting into the atmosphere is the primary driver, not the only one. Strawman number one. Strawman number two. No, we are not all going to die. But, down the road, and we do not yet know have far, is an adrupt climate change if we stay on the present course. And a great many of the population then alive will die.
What is a fucking farce is people like yourself that comment without the least idea of the subject on which you are commenting. You are sitting in front of the greatest research tool ever devised by man, and do not seem to have the least idea of how to use it.
you should try to be more condescending.
it really strengthens your argument.
I have little toleration of fools. In my trade, they get people killed.
its ok...god forbid you actually read shit with scientific data thaty proves you are wrong..you just expect people to only read your shit that you believe and you won't open your pea seized brain to something different.
Just some contributors to the report
Frano Battaglia- Professor of chemical physics and Enviromental Chemistry
Bob Carter- Paleoclimatologist and professor
Richard Courtney- Engineer for fuel use and climate consequence
Joseph D'Aleo- Meteorolgist elected councilor of AMS, first director of meteorolofy for the Weather Channel
Fred Goldberg- PHD Polar expert, organizer of 2006 Stockholm Climate Conference
Vincent Gray- PHD (Chemistry) publisger of New Zealand Climate Newsletter
Klauss Heiss- PHD Economist
Craid Idso- PHD Meteorology
Madhav Khandekar-- PHD Meteorologist, formelly with Enviorment Canada, Expert Reviewer for the IPCC 2007
Fred Singer- Atmorspheric Physicist and former director of US Weather Satellite Service
Anton Uriarte- Professor of Climatology PHD
Yeah, you're right no scientists...its ok ignore the report and dont read it cause it could prove you wrong
Who the fuck has ever heard of "James Cook University"?? Geeze, old rocks, it's too late for that. Lived in Ca. for 40 years. Seen it all, especially Ca. going to the damn spend everything, and more democrats. They're giving out IOU's for tax refunds this year. Going to be 42 billion dollars into the red until Obama bails them out with your tax dollars. I had to move to the great state Idaho to fine some sanity. I do love to fish for Ore. Salmon, though. Maybe we will meet some day and have a cup of jo. See how nice I am now that I know your from the "progressive" state of Ore? PS might have pinched an arrow point or two from Christmas Valley.
JR Reeves:
From your article:
While some may see this as evidence in direct opposition to global warming trends, NASA-funded research from 2005 indicates that expanding Antarctic ice may actually be proof positive of such warming (Warmer air may cause increased antarctic sea ice cover). “Most people have heard of climate change and how rising air temperatures are melting glaciers and sea ice in the Arctic,” said Dylan C. Powell, lead author of the paper and a doctoral candidate at the University of Maryland Baltimore County. “However, findings from our simulations suggest a counterintuitive phenomenon. Some of the melt in the Arctic may be balanced by increases in sea ice volume in the Antarctic.”
Ooops.
Expanding sea ice is a consequence of the melting of land ice, and is consistent with predictions of global warming. Makes sense to me. As land ice melts and chucks of it slide into the ocean, it increases sea ice.
OOPS.
Here's the deal dude. First, you should read your articles before posting them.
Second, nobody is really that concerned about sea ice. Other than its albedo properties. Melting land ice is what is of grave concern. Because melting land ice is what increases sea level. Melting ambient sea ice doesn't increase sea level.
And guess what? The last decade has been the warmest in recorded history, and land ice contines to melt at a rapid pace.
