Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On the other hand...we need to replace Kennedy now, so we can replace Ginsburg next.
Now if Ginsburg would just die we could see some REAL squealing!
Or that woman from Alaska.Nope.....protecting our liberties is what matters......and liberal activist judges won't do that.Not gonna happen. McConnell is a hypocrite, but at the end of the day, power is all that matters. Words and morals are just dressing.
There are 2-3 GOP RINO's we need to worry about, will McCain stab the party in the back again with a thumbs down? Then there's that idiot from Maine.
He also pulled a fast one making sure Obama won in 08'Nope.....protecting our liberties is what matters......and liberal activist judges won't do that.Not gonna happen. McConnell is a hypocrite, but at the end of the day, power is all that matters. Words and morals are just dressing.
There are 2-3 GOP RINO's we need to worry about, will McCain stab the party in the back again with a thumbs down? Then there's that idiot from Maine.
On behalf of Arizona, I apologize for McCain. We didn't know he was going to do that; he never said anything at any of the meetings.
Now if Ginsburg would just die we could see some REAL squealing!
Or that woman from Alaska.Nope.....protecting our liberties is what matters......and liberal activist judges won't do that.Not gonna happen. McConnell is a hypocrite, but at the end of the day, power is all that matters. Words and morals are just dressing.
There are 2-3 GOP RINO's we need to worry about, will McCain stab the party in the back again with a thumbs down? Then there's that idiot from Maine.
Now if Ginsburg would just die we could see some REAL squealing!
Ginsberg will never die. She's just going to nasty away.
There are legitimate reasons why Trump should not be allowed to pick a supreme court justice.
A Better Reason to Delay Kennedy’s Replacement
By Paul Schiff Berman
Mr. Berman is a professor at George Washington University Law School.
Almost immediately after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement on Wednesday, Senate Democrats argued that his replacement should not be confirmed until after the midterm elections this fall — a version of the same argument that Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, used to stymie President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in 2016.
This is surely a valid argument, not least because Mr. McConnell’s blatantly anti-democratic ploy stole a judicial appointment from a popularly elected president and gave it to one who lost the popular vote by millions.
But there is another reason to withhold confirmation that both Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree on: People under the cloud of investigation do not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases. By this logic, President Trump should not be permitted to appoint a new Supreme Court justice until after the special counsel investigation is over, and we know for sure whether there is evidence of wrongdoing.
True, that point is unlikely to stop Mr. McConnell or his colleagues. But it highlights the real risk involved in letting a deeply compromised president shape a court that may one day stand between him and impeachment.
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/29/opinion/a-better-reason-to-delay-kennedys-replacement.html
We only need a tie. Pence puts it over.Or that woman from Alaska.Nope.....protecting our liberties is what matters......and liberal activist judges won't do that.Not gonna happen. McConnell is a hypocrite, but at the end of the day, power is all that matters. Words and morals are just dressing.
There are 2-3 GOP RINO's we need to worry about, will McCain stab the party in the back again with a thumbs down? Then there's that idiot from Maine.
Yeah she's the third.
First, if a president under investigation can’t appoint judges its a good thing hildabeast isn’t in office or one seat would still be empty.There are legitimate reasons why Trump should not be allowed to pick a supreme court justice.
A Better Reason to Delay Kennedy’s Replacement
By Paul Schiff Berman
Mr. Berman is a professor at George Washington University Law School.
Almost immediately after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement on Wednesday, Senate Democrats argued that his replacement should not be confirmed until after the midterm elections this fall — a version of the same argument that Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, used to stymie President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in 2016.
This is surely a valid argument, not least because Mr. McConnell’s blatantly anti-democratic ploy stole a judicial appointment from a popularly elected president and gave it to one who lost the popular vote by millions.
But there is another reason to withhold confirmation that both Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree on: People under the cloud of investigation do not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases. By this logic, President Trump should not be permitted to appoint a new Supreme Court justice until after the special counsel investigation is over, and we know for sure whether there is evidence of wrongdoing.
True, that point is unlikely to stop Mr. McConnell or his colleagues. But it highlights the real risk involved in letting a deeply compromised president shape a court that may one day stand between him and impeachment.
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/29/opinion/a-better-reason-to-delay-kennedys-replacement.html
Nope.....protecting our liberties is what matters......and liberal activist judges won't do that.Not gonna happen. McConnell is a hypocrite, but at the end of the day, power is all that matters. Words and morals are just dressing.
There are legitimate reasons why Trump should not be allowed to pick a supreme court justice.
A Better Reason to Delay Kennedy’s Replacement
By Paul Schiff Berman
Mr. Berman is a professor at George Washington University Law School.
Almost immediately after Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement on Wednesday, Senate Democrats argued that his replacement should not be confirmed until after the midterm elections this fall — a version of the same argument that Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, used to stymie President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court in 2016.
This is surely a valid argument, not least because Mr. McConnell’s blatantly anti-democratic ploy stole a judicial appointment from a popularly elected president and gave it to one who lost the popular vote by millions.
But there is another reason to withhold confirmation that both Republicans and Democrats should be able to agree on: People under the cloud of investigation do not get to pick the judges who may preside over their cases. By this logic, President Trump should not be permitted to appoint a new Supreme Court justice until after the special counsel investigation is over, and we know for sure whether there is evidence of wrongdoing.
True, that point is unlikely to stop Mr. McConnell or his colleagues. But it highlights the real risk involved in letting a deeply compromised president shape a court that may one day stand between him and impeachment.
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/29/opinion/a-better-reason-to-delay-kennedys-replacement.html
