A Conservative Republican Ordered The IRS Tea Party Investigations

I don't give a fuck who did it, those who ordered it, those who ignored it, and those who did it, all need to go to jail.
 
I think it's been pretty well proven that orders came out of DC.

Oh? provide your evidence of that.

The IRS agents testified to that effect. Further it is inconceivable that bureaucrats like that would initiate such a program without guidance from DC.

No, an IRS agent did not testify to that fact. The agent said, and I quote, "it's impossible for that to have happened without superiors knowing about it". That does not translate to "the order came from D.C." No matter how desperately Issa wants it to be the case.
 
Last edited:
I don't give a fuck who did it, those who ordered it, those who ignored it, and those who did it, all need to go to jail.

For what? None of them were denied tax exempt status (although many should have) and even while their applications were being scrutinized, they enjoyed the status that allowed them to funnel anonymous cash to conservative candidates.
 
I don't give a fuck who did it, those who ordered it, those who ignored it, and those who did it, all need to go to jail.

For what? None of them were denied tax exempt status (although many should have) and even while their applications were being scrutinized, they enjoyed the status that allowed them to funnel anonymous cash to conservative candidates.

Civil rights violations of the 14thA.
 
I don't give a fuck who did it, those who ordered it, those who ignored it, and those who did it, all need to go to jail.

For what? None of them were denied tax exempt status (although many should have) and even while their applications were being scrutinized, they enjoyed the status that allowed them to funnel anonymous cash to conservative candidates.

Civil rights violations of the 14thA.

Nothing was denied them. They got their status. In fact, the IRS Approved More Conservative Groups Than Liberal Groups .

Do you believe, then, that Sheriff Arpio should go to jail?
 
For what? None of them were denied tax exempt status (although many should have) and even while their applications were being scrutinized, they enjoyed the status that allowed them to funnel anonymous cash to conservative candidates.

Civil rights violations of the 14thA.

Nothing was denied them. They got their status. In fact, the IRS Approved More Conservative Groups Than Liberal Groups .

Do you believe, then, that Sheriff Arpio should go to jail?
Yes they were denied a timely decision and singled out for unequal treatment. You are for equal treatment, amiright?
 
Oh? provide your evidence of that.

The IRS agents testified to that effect. Further it is inconceivable that bureaucrats like that would initiate such a program without guidance from DC.

No, an IRS agent did not testify to that fact. The agent said, and I quote, "it's impossible for that to have happened without superiors knowing about it". That does not translate to "the order came from D.C." No matter how desperately Issa wants it to be the case.

As usual you are wrong.
IRS Workers Say Supervisors Directed Targeting « CBS DC
 
Civil rights violations of the 14thA.

Nothing was denied them. They got their status. In fact, the IRS Approved More Conservative Groups Than Liberal Groups .

Do you believe, then, that Sheriff Arpio should go to jail?
Yes they were denied a timely decision and singled out for unequal treatment. You are for equal treatment, amiright?

They weren't denied anything while their applications were scrutinized. They had and kept their tax exempt status.

Yes or no, should Joe Arpio go to jail for targeting Hispanics?
 
Nothing was denied them. They got their status. In fact, the IRS Approved More Conservative Groups Than Liberal Groups .

Do you believe, then, that Sheriff Arpio should go to jail?
Yes they were denied a timely decision and singled out for unequal treatment. You are for equal treatment, amiright?

They weren't denied anything while their applications were scrutinized. They had and kept their tax exempt status.

Yes or no, should Joe Arpio go to jail for targeting Hispanics?

The delays stretched into months and years. It prevented them from raising funds. They were subject to unequal treatment, which is prohibited under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

You want to discuss Sheriff Joe, go start a thread.
 
There is a lot left to learn..

Such as why did Obama's cabinet know about the investigations and Obama didn't.
 
There is a lot left to learn..

Such as why did Obama's cabinet know about the investigations and Obama didn't.

It's a lesson learned during the Clinton summer of subpoenas. Keep the President out of the loop on investigations so there is no accusations of meddling.
 
Yes they were denied a timely decision and singled out for unequal treatment. You are for equal treatment, amiright?

They weren't denied anything while their applications were scrutinized. They had and kept their tax exempt status.

Yes or no, should Joe Arpio go to jail for targeting Hispanics?

The delays stretched into months and years. It prevented them from raising funds. They were subject to unequal treatment, which is prohibited under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.

You want to discuss Sheriff Joe, go start a thread.

Giving them 501c status was against the law.

Simple as that.
 
uhhuh

Cummings will release his 'evidence' at the end of the week.

So we will see who has the real info later.

good luck, b/c if he's lying...

Issa is refusing to release the reports. If it's found Issa is trying to cover up for the right wing cronies, I'm sure you will be leading the charge to call for his resignation, correct?

If it turns out to be true? You'll get to see the difference between a Conservative and a liberal.
 
Oh? provide your evidence of that.

The IRS agents testified to that effect. Further it is inconceivable that bureaucrats like that would initiate such a program without guidance from DC.

You should be able to provide links.

The Cincinnati based manager—a long-time employee of the IRS who self-identifies as a “conservative Republican”—was interviewed on Thursday by the staff of the Oversight Committee. What he had to say might well be the beginning of the end of Darrell Issa’s campaign to lay the blame for the IRS fiasco at the White House doorstep.

According to the transcript of the interview, the still unnamed supervisor was asked, “Do you have any reason to believe that anyone in the White House was involved in the decision to screen tea party cases?”

The manager’s response? “I have no reason to believe that.”

The gentleman is in a unique position to know what actually happened as he was the supervisor who, in 2010, sent the matter to the IRS technical office in Washington for further guidance after an IRS screener under his supervision identified an applicant for 501 (c)(4) status as a “high profile’” conservative organization. According to the manager, he forwarded the case to the Washington based technical folks for their guidance so that the matter could be treated “with consistency”.

What this tells us is that this was not a case of Washington instructing the Cincinnati office to target Tea Party applicants but rather it was the Cincinnati office that first sought guidance from the IRS in Washington as to how to handle the matter. This is a far cry, indeed, from what Chairman Issa has been trying to sell to the American public through his constant—yet fully unsubstantiated—claims that the targeting originated in White House.​

The Proof That White House Was Not Involved In IRS Tea Party Targeting Finally Exposed?
 
People like swallow and witch deserve this regime. Let's hope they get to experience the fullness of it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top