A Democrat finally admits Gun Confiscation is the Goal

[Blues Man]

Nut job killers love the military style. You want a diagram?

Your opinion runs contrary to established fact.

Sure if you say so LOL.. show me a nut job killer who didn't have military style equipment.

None of them did.

Military firearms are capable of selective and / or fully automatic fire

Military STYLE, duh. You do need a diagram.

So you mean a plain old semiautomatic rifle with some plastic stuff attached to it?

If you put a spoiler and racing slicks on a Prius, it's still a Prius and not a corvette

 

[Blues Man]

Military STYLE, duh. You do need a diagram.

We need a fucking diagram. Please.

Military STYLE is so loose, it could be fucking ANYTHING.

It means they look like military weapons. Jeesh!

But they do not OPERATE like military weapons.

Who cares what they look like?

 

[Blues Man]

Today's military weapons, mr. Obtuse. LOL

Sounds okay to me. Btw, these are obsolete/ex-US military, so I assume you approve them:

View attachment 255524
View attachment 255525

Hunting style is the good style.Confiscation will never happen in this guy is a idiot from California who wants to get the far left on this stuff.

So I can have a "hunting style " rifle with a wood stock that operates exactly like a "military style " gun because the "hunting style" gun doesn't have black plastic doodads on it?

 

[cnm]

I would love to hear him explain what the difference between military style semiautomatic weapon is and a non military style one.

You're obviously too thick to understand if you haven't got it by now. But I'll give it another shot and paste pictures very slowly. See if you can pick the difference.

 

[Blues Man]

I would love to hear him explain what the difference between military style semiautomatic weapon is and a non military style one.

You're obviously too thick to understand if you haven't got it by now. But I'll give it another shot and paste pictures very slowly. See if you can pick the difference.

The 3 rifles pictured above are all the same rifle with different looks

SO tell me why the one at the top is OK and the 2 on the bottom are not

 

[cnm]

SO tell me why the one at the top is OK and the 2 on the bottom are not

If they're the same rifle the one at the top will accept a detachable magazine. None of them that will accept detachable magazines are ok. Looks like you too were too thick to spot the difference.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Click bait headline. It's one intellectually impaired Democrat, not the party.

Wait... you think the Democratic party on the whole doesn't want to ban 'assault weapons'?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Swalwell is only talking about assault weapons - like Reagan did.

It does not matter how many times you repeat hese lies, they remain lies.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Nut job killers love the military style. You want a diagram?

Your opinion runs contrary to established fact.

Sure if you say so LOL.. show me a nut job killer who didn't have military style equipment.

None of them did.
Military firearms are capable of selective and / or fully automatic fire

Military STYLE, duh. You do need a diagram.

Yes. Show us what you mean by "military style".

 

[M14 Shooter]

I don't believe confiscation will ever happen in the United States. Just background checks and no more sales of military style maybe someday

Again...
You want to ban BDUs and LBE?

 

[M14 Shooter]

I am not impressed.

Or competent to carry on an intelligent conversation.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Military STYLE, duh. You do need a diagram.

We need a fucking diagram. Please.
Military STYLE is so loose, it could be fucking ANYTHING.

It means they look like military weapons. Jeesh!

Like this?

 

[Blues Man]

SO tell me why the one at the top is OK and the 2 on the bottom are not

If they're the same rifle the one at the top will accept a detachable magazine. None of them that will accept detachable magazines are ok. Looks like you too were too thick to spot the difference.

And you're too thick to realize that magazines don't make a rifle any more effective
But then again I forgot you're from NZ and your opinion holds no weight in the US

Why don't you worry about your own country and let us worry about ours?

 

[M14 Shooter]

It means they look like military weapons. Jeesh!

You mean like this, right?
View attachment 255522

Today's military weapons, mr. Obtuse. LOL

Oh. So, then this:

 

[cnm]

Yes. Show us what you mean by "military style".

Are you blind? I just did.

 

[M14 Shooter]

In the Esquire interview, nowhere does Swalwell advocate for ‘confiscation.’

You apparently did not read his quote in that article.

Why do you need to lie to make a point?

 

[cnm]

And you're too thick to realize that magazines don't make a rifle any more effective

If you think a detachable large magazine capacity is not more effective when one has a lot of targets I can understand why you play blues.

 

[22lcidw]

California Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell:
"I’m the only candidate calling for a mandatory national ban and buyback of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons."

This liberal Democrat admits it - why don't the rest?

Obviously you didn’t bother to read the interview.

You’re as ignorant and as dishonest as most others on the right, as much of a liar and a demagogue as most on the right.

Many people do not trust you anymore. From my perspective and this may not be you, the agendas mean that a person with your views will rape a grandchild. Your attacking people for being boring!

 

[M14 Shooter]

SO tell me why the one at the top is OK and the 2 on the bottom are not

If they're the same rifle the one at the top will accept a detachable magazine. None of them that will accept detachable magazines are ok. Looks like you too were too thick to spot the difference.

And YOU"RE too thick to understand the point.

 

[cnm]

I love the frantic gun nut semantic dance to avoid the point.