🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

A great example of why socialism is better than "charity"

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

Every cell in his body is male, ironically with the exception of his sperm cells.
 
So is the left wing
we have better solutions at lower cost. the right wing has nothing but repeal.
You have no solutions but massively higher cost and repeal works.

Repealing bad ideas such as all of the failed socialist policies is the best solution but the right wing will not repeal them which is why the right wing is as bad as the left wing.
lol. right wing solutions are worse.

the left is willing to beat Whatever the right wing has to offer by ten percent and help with social costs.

They are not worse they are just the same

The left only wants more of the same proven failure while the right refuses to stop them
we can do it for less and help with social costs.
^ Excuse me danielpalos
But if we applied this same logic or reasoning to Christianity,
we'd get rid of criminal abuse and addiction and cure diseases
for "LESS" and "help with social costs"

But no, that is NOT justification for Govt to establish certain Christian beliefs and practices,
just because those would save lives, health and help with social costs.

Do you understand when presented this way danielpalos?

If the argument defending Socialism beliefs through Govt
only requires "saving costs and/or lives" then this same argument
can be used to justify Govt adopting Christian beliefs and practices.

We see this conflict already with
* some people pushing "Right to Life" beliefs through Govt as legally necessary
* some people pushing "Right to Health Care" beliefs through Govt as legally necessary
* some people like me saying BOTH of the above are BELIEFS and should remain free choice of taxpayers to fund
according to their beliefs and standards on the terms and conditions

CC: Pogo since this relates indirectly to the other thread,
can I please ask your help to take the point of my comparison
above, relating beliefs about Socialism through Govt and
beliefs about Christianity through Govt, where if one is
crossing the line with religious beliefs and freedom, so is the other.

Can you please help reword this so I can communicate that concept to danielpalos
Even if you disagree and don't believe Christianity and Socialism should be
treated as beliefs that require free choice of citizens and are not for Govt to establish by law.
 
true capitalism is nature not nurture.
It's neither
it must be.
No it is not and there is no reason for it to be
yes, there is. and, you know know that if knew anything about economics instead of simply appealing to ignorance and bigotry.

Look in the mirror. You post nothing but ignorance and fallacy.
No I correct yours
 
So is the left wing
we have better solutions at lower cost. the right wing has nothing but repeal.
You have no solutions but massively higher cost and repeal works.

Repealing bad ideas such as all of the failed socialist policies is the best solution but the right wing will not repeal them which is why the right wing is as bad as the left wing.
lol. right wing solutions are worse.

the left is willing to beat Whatever the right wing has to offer by ten percent and help with social costs.

They are not worse they are just the same

The left only wants more of the same proven failure while the right refuses to stop them
we can do it for less and help with social costs.
No you can't
Socialism is always more costly and solves nothing

If what you say could be done it would have been done already but never has
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

More socialism? Take a history class and learn something please. How is your caliphate? Any dogs left in the UK?
 
Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.
It does not actually
 
Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

Biology is a science and it clearly defines male and female.
 
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

Every cell in his body is male, ironically with the exception of his sperm cells.

Maybe Tommy thinks women can have sperm. Maybe he's the bitch in his faggot relationship.
 
Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

Every cell in his body is male, ironically with the exception of his sperm cells.

Maybe Tommy thinks women can have sperm. Maybe he's the bitch in his faggot relationship.
Thanks for that you thick fucker.
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .
I also pick and choose who I help. Maybe you should be doing more to help the people you like before demanding help from others.
 
we have better solutions at lower cost. the right wing has nothing but repeal.
You have no solutions but massively higher cost and repeal works.

Repealing bad ideas such as all of the failed socialist policies is the best solution but the right wing will not repeal them which is why the right wing is as bad as the left wing.
lol. right wing solutions are worse.

the left is willing to beat Whatever the right wing has to offer by ten percent and help with social costs.

They are not worse they are just the same

The left only wants more of the same proven failure while the right refuses to stop them
we can do it for less and help with social costs.
^ Excuse me danielpalos
But if we applied this same logic or reasoning to Christianity,
we'd get rid of criminal abuse and addiction and cure diseases
for "LESS" and "help with social costs"

But no, that is NOT justification for Govt to establish certain Christian beliefs and practices,
just because those would save lives, health and help with social costs.

Do you understand when presented this way danielpalos?

If the argument defending Socialism beliefs through Govt
only requires "saving costs and/or lives" then this same argument
can be used to justify Govt adopting Christian beliefs and practices.

We see this conflict already with
* some people pushing "Right to Life" beliefs through Govt as legally necessary
* some people pushing "Right to Health Care" beliefs through Govt as legally necessary
* some people like me saying BOTH of the above are BELIEFS and should remain free choice of taxpayers to fund
according to their beliefs and standards on the terms and conditions

CC: Pogo since this relates indirectly to the other thread,
can I please ask your help to take the point of my comparison
above, relating beliefs about Socialism through Govt and
beliefs about Christianity through Govt, where if one is
crossing the line with religious beliefs and freedom, so is the other.

Can you please help reword this so I can communicate that concept to danielpalos
Even if you disagree and don't believe Christianity and Socialism should be
treated as beliefs that require free choice of citizens and are not for Govt to establish by law.
Ten simple Commandments from a God not the Expense of Government. Good capitalists do.
 
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

1295180.png
 
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.
He's not a woman. Basic biology says so. Why do you ignore science?
Science disagrees with you.

Every cell in his body is male, ironically with the exception of his sperm cells.

Maybe Tommy thinks women can have sperm. Maybe he's the bitch in his faggot relationship.
Thanks for that you thick fucker.

Thanks for proving what we all suspected.
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .
My republican buddy’s wife got cancer. They couldn’t afford the deductible or copayment so they had a charity fund raiser.

He didn’t invite me. Not after all the arguments we had about socialized medicine.

Stupid Americans. Free to be broken by medical costs.

Does the idiot know if republicans could they would let the insurance companies deny her because she has a pre existing condition?
Arent there charities in the US that cover things like this ? In the UK socialised medicine would care for this poor woman until she was well again.

Charity turns the recipient into a beggar to be pitied. Socialism is a contract between government and the people that lets you keep some dignity.

I'm fascinated by the way you cite one of the primary reasons for charity as a negative aspect.

Dignity comes from one's self and one's actions; it is most definitely not conveyed by stealing someone else's money via government and being told you have a right to feel good about it.
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

HE is not a woman, and Jesus would have told him to stop putting his own desires ahead of the needs of others. Then He'd have given him the address of a shelter that was NOT for women only (or, more likely, have healed him of the mental defect that made him imagine he was something he wasn't).

Just FYI, Christian is not defined as "agreeing with Tommy inane beliefs".
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.

As a man, he puts all the other women in the shelter at risk. Are you really suggesting that his needs and desires invalidate the needs of all those other people? Those women didn't decide for him to run around, pretending to be female. That was his choice. Ultimately, finding a way to deal with it is HIS responsibility; it is no one else's responsibility to suffer so that he can have what he wants.
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Right, they turned away a man. At a Christian shelter. Now they probably should have driven her somewhere else, but they were right.

Tommy, what would your beloved Muslims have done? Why are you always picking on the Christians?
She is a woman and these people are not Christians. Would Jesus have turned her away ?

Let's see. Send one person to a different shelter vs. protecting a shelter full of already traumatized and brutalized women from another man. Such a hard call.
As a woman she would be at risk going to a mans shelter.

As a man, he's a risk to the battered women. Biology rules.

It's not even an issue of whether or not he himself is physically dangerous to those women. The point is, they have already been traumatized, and his mere presence would further exacerbate that trauma, to the point where many of them would leave and risk their own health and welfare. Does their trauma and need to feel safe as victims no longer matter because it doesn't coincide with the PC line on how they "should" feel? That shelter was set up precisely for the purpose of helping not just with the cold and hunger and homelessness, but with the trauma of victims of violence. Is Tommy really suggesting that they should abandon their entire mission in existing, and the welfare of dozens of women, all in order to make one person who doesn't fit their mission parameters feel good?
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .
My republican buddy’s wife got cancer. They couldn’t afford the deductible or copayment so they had a charity fund raiser.

He didn’t invite me. Not after all the arguments we had about socialized medicine.

Stupid Americans. Free to be broken by medical costs.

Does the idiot know if republicans could they would let the insurance companies deny her because she has a pre existing condition?
Arent there charities in the US that cover things like this ? In the UK socialised medicine would care for this poor woman until she was well again.

Charity turns the recipient into a beggar to be pitied. Socialism is a contract between government and the people that lets you keep some dignity.

I'm fascinated by the way you cite one of the primary reasons for charity as a negative aspect.

Dignity comes from one's self and one's actions; it is most definitely not conveyed by stealing someone else's money via government and being told you have a right to feel good about it.

Socialism is a lot more dignified than charity. Everybody pays in and everybody is entitled. Its a right. The NHS works on the same principle. How many Americans are suffering in pain because they cant afford the treatment ? Barbaric.
 
Christian homeless shelter defends decision to turn away trans woman

A Christian homeless shelter in Alaska has defended turning away a homeless transgender woman on a cold January evening.

The Downtown Hope Center shelter in Anchorage, Alaska, is under investigation from the city’s Equal Rights Commission after a vulnerable homeless trans woman with nowhere to sleep was denied access into the women’s shelter.
Police had dropped the unnamed woman, identified as Jessie Doe, at the overnight shelter in January 2018—but twice in two days she was turned away by staff.

The average overnight January temperature in Anchorage, Alaska, is -12° Celsius (9° Fahrenheit).

Here is a "charity" that picks those it helps by criteria other than need. The US needs more socialism so that less people freeze on Winters nights. So does the UK for that matter. .

Since she's not a woman, he should have been denied. Sounds to me like he wanted special treatment and people to ignore basic biology.

There's an easy solution. How about you bleeding hearts fool enough to believe someone can be a gender because they feel like it take them into your homes.

How about they take all the money they're spending on trying to harass this shelter out of business, and use it to open a shelter for LGBTQ homeless people?
 

Forum List

Back
Top