A hefty dose of "irony," anyone???

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation, he is still on the committee and is still entitled to not only see the results, but vote on their release to the President.

He did more than vote, liar.

He compiled the memo.

Sessions is recused and won't even make a public comment on the subject let alone compile memos.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

 

[nat4900]

Why? Do you have an actual lawful reason whe should be removed?

Did Nunes recuse himself, YES or NO???

Simple question....go on and answer it....

 

[martybegan]

Why? Do you have an actual lawful reason whe should be removed?

Did Nunes recuse himself, YES or NO???

Simple question....go on and answer it....

Yes or No doesn't give the right answer.

he recused himself from the investigation, not from being on the Committee.

 

[nat4900]

. all agencies that work for the President are merely delegation of the power he holds.

Would you be OK with the DOJ investigating Don Jr. and Trump-daddy ordering the DOJ to drop the investigation?......Yes or No?

 

[nat4900]

[QUOTE="martybegan, post: 19178499, member: 23094"]he recused himself from the investigation, not from being on the Committee.[/QUOTE]


Re-think what you just wrote.....and join me in laughing......

 

[Redfish]

The FBI and the DOJ work for the President. Congress via committee said to release the memo. If the President wants to release it, that is his right.

Considering the issue is entrenched partisan hacks inside both the DOJ and the FBI their protests ring hollow.

Fantastic !!! Let the GOP continue with its suicidal pact for the sake of the Trump Cult...

the truth about your hero Obama and his corrupt cronies scares the livin shit out of you, doesn't it, gnat?

Sorry, but the public has the right to know how the dems and the FBI top guys violated the law. Heads will roll, people will go to jail. Obama and the Clintons will be proven criminals once again.

 

[Redfish]

. all agencies that work for the President are merely delegation of the power he holds.

Would you be OK with the DOJ investigating Don Jr. and Trump-daddy ordering the DOJ to drop the investigation?......Yes or No?

they already did and found nothing. WTF is wrong with you, gnat?

 

[nat4900]

What I know is the left and the establishment will do anything to either get Trump out of office, or neuter him.

NOT I...........I want for Trump to be around a while longer to FULLY trash the GOP.

 

[nat4900]

they already did and found nothing.

You know this from what hannity tells you, you fucking moron?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He did more than vote, liar.

He compiled the memo.

Sessions is recused and won't even make a public comment on the subject let alone compile memos.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

 

[martybegan]

. all agencies that work for the President are merely delegation of the power he holds.

Would you be OK with the DOJ investigating Don Jr. and Trump-daddy ordering the DOJ to drop the investigation?......Yes or No?

if the investigation was nothing more than a witch hunt, then yes.

The real issue is that the power to remove the executive lies with Congress, and as a separate branch they are not beholden to him.

If an actual crime has occurred it's up to congress to handle it.

 

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation, he is still on the committee and is still entitled to not only see the results, but vote on their release to the President.

He did more than vote, liar.

He compiled the memo.

Sessions is recused and won't even make a public comment on the subject let alone compile memos.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Wrong. He can still read the results of the investigation, and nothing prevents him from commenting on it.

 

[Redfish]

they already did and found nothing.

You know this from what hannity tells you, you fucking moron?

I don't watch Hannity, do you? I know that from the reports released by the investigators, to date nothing has been found to indicate any wrong doing by Trump or anyone on his campaign team.

However, there is plenty that has been found to substantiate criminal activity by the Clinton campaign, the FBI, and the Obama administration.

Careful what you wish for, gnat.

 

[nat4900]

At "best" for you Trump cult members is that he "gets off on a technicality" ........stating that the FBI made a mistake in procuring a warrant..............NEGLECTING what the warrant found.

Most criminals would cheer your "loyalty" to the law.

 

[nat4900]

However, there is plenty that has been found to substantiate criminal activity by the Clinton campaign, the FBI, and the Obama administration.

Careful what you wish for, gnat.

Moron.........this thread is NOT about Clinton and Obama....Stick to the fucking topic or go start another thread.

 

[martybegan]

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

Again, he recused himself from the investigation. He did not recuse himself from the committee.

 

[martybegan]

At "best" for you Trump cult members is that he "gets off on a technicality" ........stating that the FBI made a mistake in procuring a warrant..............NEGLECTING what the warrant found.

Most criminals would cheer your "loyalty" to the law.

So the law isn't important when going after people you personally don't like?

 

[martybegan]

[QUOTE="martybegan, post: 19178499, member: 23094"]he recused himself from the investigation, not from being on the Committee.

Re-think what you just wrote.....and join me in laughing......[/QUOTE]

it makes perfect sense as long as you aren't a progressive half-wit such as yourself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He did more than vote, liar.

He compiled the memo.

Sessions is recused and won't even make a public comment on the subject let alone compile memos.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Wrong. He can still read the results of the investigation, and nothing prevents him from commenting on it.

He didn't simply "comment" on it.

 

[martybegan]

What I know is the left and the establishment will do anything to either get Trump out of office, or neuter him.

NOT I...........I want for Trump to be around a while longer to FULLY trash the GOP.

Bullshit. you will take whatever you can get.