A hefty dose of "irony," anyone???

[martybegan]

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Wrong. He can still read the results of the investigation, and nothing prevents him from commenting on it.

He didn't simply "comment" on it.

Again, considering it hasn't been released yet, how does a nobody like you know?

 

[August West]

The FBI and the DOJ work for the President. Congress via committee said to release the memo. If the President wants to release it, that is his right.

Considering the issue is entrenched partisan hacks inside both the DOJ and the FBI their protests ring hollow.

Fantastic !!! Let the GOP continue with its suicidal pact for the sake of the Trump Cult...

the truth about your hero Obama and his corrupt cronies scares the livin shit out of you, doesn't it, gnat?

Sorry, but the public has the right to know how the dems and the FBI top guys violated the law. Heads will roll, people will go to jail. Obama and the Clintons will be proven criminals once again.

How can Obama and the Clintons be proven criminals AGAIN if they`ve never been charged or proven to be criminals in the first place? Your fantasies don`t count.

 

[martybegan]

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself.

Compiled from information from the investigation in which he recused himself

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

Not good enough, words can mean different things in different situations.

You just go 'fuh fuh fuh, recusal, fuh fuh fuh" and assume it means he just blinks out of existence. The truth is he only recused himself from an active role in the investigation.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Wrong. He can still read the results of the investigation, and nothing prevents him from commenting on it.

He didn't simply "comment" on it.

Again, considering it hasn't been released yet, how does a nobody like you know?

I've explained that to you. Why do you imagine it's called the "Nunes memo"?

 

[nat4900]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation. He did not recuse himself from the committee.

The verb recuse is used in legal situations and means to remove someone from a position of judicial authority, usually because of some bias.

 

[Redfish]

However, there is plenty that has been found to substantiate criminal activity by the Clinton campaign, the FBI, and the Obama administration.

Careful what you wish for, gnat.

Moron.........this thread is NOT about Clinton and Obama....Stick to the fucking topic or go start another thread.

this thread is another example of the desperation of you left wing fools who cannot get over the FACT that the country chose Trump over crooked, lying, old, senile, Hillary Clinton.

I was merely pointing out that your witch hunt has turned up turd after turd from the Clintons and Obama, as well as their cronies in the FBI and the lying media.

You fools started it and its coming back on you big time. I find it funny.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Exactly. Why is he compiling anything regarding an investigation from which he is supposed to be recused?

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

Not good enough, words can mean different things in different situations.

You just go 'fuh fuh fuh, recusal, fuh fuh fuh" and assume it means he just blinks out of existence. The truth is he only recused himself from an active role in the investigation.

No, recusal has only one meaning and creating a memo regarding how evidence was gathered in the investigation is taking an active role in the investigation.

 

[nat4900]

this thread is another example of the desperation of you left wing fools

Hey. Mr. Tuna.......then you have NOTHING to worry about.....Your fucking orange hero is in the clear....go back to bed, then....LOL

 

[Redfish]

The FBI and the DOJ work for the President. Congress via committee said to release the memo. If the President wants to release it, that is his right.

Considering the issue is entrenched partisan hacks inside both the DOJ and the FBI their protests ring hollow.

Fantastic !!! Let the GOP continue with its suicidal pact for the sake of the Trump Cult...

the truth about your hero Obama and his corrupt cronies scares the livin shit out of you, doesn't it, gnat?

Sorry, but the public has the right to know how the dems and the FBI top guys violated the law. Heads will roll, people will go to jail. Obama and the Clintons will be proven criminals once again.

How can Obama and the Clintons be proven criminals AGAIN if they`ve never been charged or proven to be criminals in the first place? Your fantasies don`t count.

being illegally exonerated does not equal innocent. This is not over. no fantasy involved except the Trump/Russia stole the election one that you libs cannot let go of.

 

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Wrong. He can still read the results of the investigation, and nothing prevents him from commenting on it.

He didn't simply "comment" on it.

Again, considering it hasn't been released yet, how does a nobody like you know?

I've explained that to you. Why do you imagine it's called the "Nunes memo"?

And who titled it that? What source? is it named?

 

[Redfish]

this thread is another example of the desperation of you left wing fools

Hey. Mr. Tuna.......then you have NOTHING to worry about.....Your fucking orange hero is in the clear....go back to bed, then....LOL

I get it, gnat. you hate Trump, that's fine. But creating lies about him just makes you and your kind look like the desperate fools that you are.

If Trump violated the law, I would be the first to say he should be prosecuted. Would you say the same about Obama and the Clintons? its a yes or no question, gnat.

 

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation. He did not recuse himself from the committee.

The verb recuse is used in legal situations and means to remove someone from a position of judicial authority, usually because of some bias.

This isn't a judicial situation, it is a legislative one. And he did recuse himself from the investigation.

He did not recuse himself from the committee, which is responsible for the results of the investigation.

 

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

Not good enough, words can mean different things in different situations.

You just go 'fuh fuh fuh, recusal, fuh fuh fuh" and assume it means he just blinks out of existence. The truth is he only recused himself from an active role in the investigation.

No, recusal has only one meaning and creating a memo regarding how evidence was gathered in the investigation is taking an active role in the investigation.

No, it isn't. But keep stretching definitions to suit your own interest, you cheap, dime store hack.

 

[nat4900]

If Trump violated the law, I would be the first to say he should be prosecuted. Would you say the same about Obama and the Clintons? its a yes or no question, gnat.

Sure.........Since your fucking party is in charge of EVERYTHING....Go on and start an investigation (and thread) about Clinton and Obama....

Meanwhile......ponder this about Trump....


Trump denies business dealings with Russia - The Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com/.../trump...dealings-with-russia/.../b0e...
Jan 11, 2017

BUT............................

Eric trump once said, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’

Trump Jr.'s love affair with Moscow - POLITICO

Jul 12, 2017 - At the conference, he showed a deep familiarity with the Moscow real estate market and the Russian economy. “We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” he said of Trump Organization properties. “There's indeed a lot of money coming for new-builds and resale reflecting a trend in the Russian ...

 

[nat4900]

This isn't a judicial situation, it is a legislative one. And he did recuse himself from the investigation.

He did not recuse himself from the committee, which is responsible for the results of the investigation.

Tell you what.......go to your grave believing your own bullshit.

 

[kwc57]

What I know is the left and the establishment will do anything to either get Trump out of office, or neuter him.

NOT I...........I want for Trump to be around a while longer to FULLY trash the GOP.

So do most conservatives, because the GOP is almost as worthless as the DNC. Most of the establishment GOP are proving to be as liberal as the DNC. When you drain the swamp, you don't give a shit what t-shirt the alligators are wearing.

 

[nat4900]

No, it isn't. But keep stretching definitions to suit your own interest, you cheap, dime store hack.

Ponder this..............Sessions recused himself.......and if tomorrow, Sessions decides to FIRE Mueller.....following your fucked up logic. you'd be OK with that little situation?

 

[martybegan]

This isn't a judicial situation, it is a legislative one. And he did recuse himself from the investigation.

He did not recuse himself from the committee, which is responsible for the results of the investigation.

Tell you what.......go to your grave believing your own bullshit.

Thank you for losing the argument.

 

[kwc57]

If Trump violated the law, I would be the first to say he should be prosecuted. Would you say the same about Obama and the Clintons? its a yes or no question, gnat.

Sure.........Since your fucking party is in charge of EVERYTHING....Go on and start an investigation (and thread) about Clinton and Obama....

Meanwhile......ponder this about Trump....


Trump denies business dealings with Russia - The Washington Post
www.washingtonpost.com/.../trump...dealings-with-russia/.../b0e...
Jan 11, 2017

BUT............................

Eric trump once said, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’

Trump Jr.'s love affair with Moscow - POLITICO

Jul 12, 2017 - At the conference, he showed a deep familiarity with the Moscow real estate market and the Russian economy. “We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” he said of Trump Organization properties. “There's indeed a lot of money coming for new-builds and resale reflecting a trend in the Russian ...

Dimwit, unless the GOP holds a 60 vote majority in the Senate, they do NOT control everything. Nice try, but no cigar.

 

[martybegan]

Again, he recused himself from the investigation part, he is still part of the committee and thus can still work on the information as presented.

No.

Recusal means he has nothing at all to do with it. The most he should do is sign off on anything needing his signature as committee chair.

Do you have a law to back that up?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Do you have a law to back that up?

I have a definition of the word. What do you imagine it means?

He had nothing to do with the investigation, as he recused himself from it.

Except of course to compile a memo regarding the collection of evidence in said investigation in an attempt to damage the credibility of said investigation.

Not good enough, words can mean different things in different situations.

You just go 'fuh fuh fuh, recusal, fuh fuh fuh" and assume it means he just blinks out of existence. The truth is he only recused himself from an active role in the investigation.

No, recusal has only one meaning and creating a memo regarding how evidence was gathered in the investigation is taking an active role in the investigation.

No, it isn't. its merely interpreting the results of the investigation.