A little perspective on 2014 Senate

It's hard to lose a debate with a teabagger, but it does happen....rarely.
What exactly, in my response, wasn't true?

You do realize that hurling epithets and spewing idiocy from the hate sites is not "debate," right sploogy?


And you calling me a drooling retard is so mature. I've called you little more than teabagger.....A name proudly chosen by your own party.

And so appropriate....
Teabagger is an appropriate name.
Hardly, when meant as a pejorative the way you use it.

Look TEA Party people tied teabags to their hats and naively called themselves tea baggers. If you were sympathetic to their views and used the term in the intended connotation, then fine. Using it as a pejorative is akin to the disconnect with blacks calling each other nigga and the shit storm I'd stir up if I used the word in anger here.

Feel free to call me teabagger. It doesn't hurt me a bit. What should I call you?
 
The reality is the American People are tired of the on going pissing contest. Hope for change has faded as many voters now believe the political process has become so corrupted by money and ideology that it is beyond repair.

As a Democrat I'm optimistic now that the Republicans control the H. of Rep. and the Senate. We will see which ideological force within the GOP wins the battle and sets the agenda for the next two years.

If the crazy New Right sets the agenda, the voters will in mass send them packing in 2016; if the adults in the Republican Party set the agenda, we may begin to see compromise rehabilitated in The District, which will benefit all of us.

Good Points! Basically, the GOP now has a chance to prove they are "Adults.:" Will they take up the banner or revert to the screaming Cruz mentality.
 
How could I identify you as Liberal, Progressive or anything else by your ballot? I'm terribly sorry for your butthurt.


Tissue?

The difference is, I don't make a distinction. I'm a Democrat, and that includes all the things you listed. You will never hear a Democrat claim to be a liberal but not a progressive, but the right wing tries to pretend there is a difference between whatever they claim to be all the other flavors of right wingery or teabaggery. I'm just asking what the difference is?
I'm a Conservative. I am registered as a Republican, though I am rarely happy with my party's presidential nominee. I have attended quite a few TEA Party rallies, but I'm not a card carrying member.

If you want to put me on some kind of a scale, think 2 steps right of Rush Limbaugh and one left of Mike Huckaby.

And yes, some here claim to be Liberal or Progressive, but not both.

That puts you square in the middle of teabagger territory. I won't ask you to go back and find examples of someone who claims to be only liberal but denies being progressive, or the other way around, but if you ever see it again, please let me know. I'm not calling you a liar, but I'm pretty sure you are mistaken. Even if you do find one (which I doubt) it's certainly not the widespread way it is for teabaggers.

what is all this "teabagger" stuff?..you a homosexual or something?
We don't want to hear about your sex life in here, man.

I've said it hundreds of times. I didn't chose that name for you. Your bunch did. You want to call all democrats lazy, traitorous, communist, socialists, etc. etc. on a regular basis and see nothing unusual about that, but you think it's out of line to call you a name chosen by you? That's crazy.

You can say it a thousand times still will never be true,The tea baggers as you call them,started out by calling themselves the tea party,it people like yourself that changed it to tea baggers,after a sexual act,rather pathetic
 
That's pretty juvenile..you set up false "goals" that the republicans have to accomplish.
The object isn't to send him bills that please him so he can sign them....america is tired of what obama wants..people are more interested in what's good for the country.

At this point the goal st to try to prevent further damage due to illegal immigration and open borders...and to dismantle ACA.

Except the establishment in your own party
.and there is your first mistake.
I'm a dedicated anarchist. I know the real score...you hyperpartisans can call each other names and post fake charts and funny cartoons...useful idiots...


wants an Amnesty deal on immigration. and they really stopped talking about "dismantling' the ACA (notice you are calling it the ACA now) and instead "fixing" it.

I know...both parties suck, joe... but the border will have to get closed eventually or there will be trouble...and ACA is unsustainable fiscally and now that people are beginning to see the actual results rather than the platitudes of how great it would be...a majority of americans rejects ACA

So they'll pass a few things around the edges and Obama walks out in 2017 being able to say he reformed health care.

ACA won't survive..and I doubt he'll pull this amnesty he keeps threatening..his own party is going to chill him out on that one...america doesn't want open borders or
for illegals to bypass the legal immigration system that has been in place and worked for over 200 years.


Just a question for you. The right wing is full of different things they call themselves because they are embarrassed to just admit they are teabagger/Gop dittoheads. Libertarian, Conservative, Independent, some of the silly ones call themselves even more off the wall things , like anarchist. An anarchist wouldn't be voting anyway. My question is, what exactly is the difference in all those silly names when every one of them vote exactly the same way? If I were to look at your ballot, exactly how would I tell the difference between it or any other teabaggers ballot? I truly understand your embarrassment to admit you are the same as all the others listed, but what exactly is the difference?

man what a brainwashed parrot of DNC talking points. what a shame
 
]
No...you give what you are, my friend....

Most say that you socialist have no standards at all, but in reality you have millions of standards. depending on the political affiliation and pull of the person involved.

You don't like being called "cumguzzlers?" Then don't call others "teabaggers."

It's a fairly simply concept, one that even the typical democrat should be able to grasp.
 
Anybody else notice that when the cheesedick OP gets pwned in here, he fags out and splits the thread for a bit so it can peter out and then he comes back. How gay?


Anyway........HUGE NGHT for Second Amender guys like myself. Gun grabbers took a direct nut sack kick Tuesday night!!
 
The reality is the American People are tired of the on going pissing contest. Hope for change has faded as many voters now believe the political process has become so corrupted by money and ideology that it is beyond repair.

As a Democrat I'm optimistic now that the Republicans control the H. of Rep. and the Senate. We will see which ideological force within the GOP wins the battle and sets the agenda for the next two years.

If the crazy New Right sets the agenda, the voters will in mass send them packing in 2016; if the adults in the Republican Party set the agenda, we may begin to see compromise rehabilitated in The District, which will benefit all of us.

Good Points! Basically, the GOP now has a chance to prove they are "Adults.:" Will they take up the banner or revert to the screaming Cruz mentality.

oh please, you have harry reid on the floor bitching about the Koch brothers, Obama wailing about Fox new, rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin etc. YOU CALL that acting an adult?. You lib/Dems can just sit back now, nobody is going to BOW TO YOUR DEMANDS. get used to being in the MINORITY. that's what you all are
 
Watching all the insane crowing about an off year election, you have to consider the following.

President Obama got 69 Million votes in 2008 and 66 million in 2012. These are STILL the two highest vote totals ever achieved by ANYONE in the history of the United states.

So how many votes were expended to send knuckle-draggers to the Senate in nine states?

NCTillis1,413,269
COGarner965,496
LACassidy602,439
IAErnst586,921
ARCotton476,309
WVCapito280,123
MTDaines210,863
SDRounds140,721
AKSullivan110,203
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Grand total of all the seats that flipped?

4,786,344

Yup. less than 8% of what Obama got in 2012.
Do you truly think comparing the number of votes received in a nation-wide, 50-state, presidential election to state-wide senate elections in 9 states is relevant or valid in any way, shape, or form? This isn't even partisan idiocy, it's just idiocy.
 
The reality is the American People are tired of the on going pissing contest. Hope for change has faded as many voters now believe the political process has become so corrupted by money and ideology that it is beyond repair.

As a Democrat I'm optimistic now that the Republicans control the H. of Rep. and the Senate. We will see which ideological force within the GOP wins the battle and sets the agenda for the next two years.

If the crazy New Right sets the agenda, the voters will in mass send them packing in 2016; if the adults in the Republican Party set the agenda, we may begin to see compromise rehabilitated in The District, which will benefit all of us.

Good Points! Basically, the GOP now has a chance to prove they are "Adults.:" Will they take up the banner or revert to the screaming Cruz mentality.

oh please, you have harry reid on the floor bitching about the Koch brothers, Obama wailing about Fox new, rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin etc. YOU CALL that acting an adult?. You lib/Dems can just sit back now, nobody is going to BOW TO YOUR DEMANDS. get used to being in the MINORITY. that's what you all are

Stephanie is representative of the crazy New Right; she is too limited to ever get it. Sadly, she's not alone.
 
The reality is the American People are tired of the on going pissing contest. Hope for change has faded as many voters now believe the political process has become so corrupted by money and ideology that it is beyond repair.

As a Democrat I'm optimistic now that the Republicans control the H. of Rep. and the Senate. We will see which ideological force within the GOP wins the battle and sets the agenda for the next two years.

If the crazy New Right sets the agenda, the voters will in mass send them packing in 2016; if the adults in the Republican Party set the agenda, we may begin to see compromise rehabilitated in The District, which will benefit all of us.

Good Points! Basically, the GOP now has a chance to prove they are "Adults.:" Will they take up the banner or revert to the screaming Cruz mentality.

oh please, you have harry reid on the floor bitching about the Koch brothers, Obama wailing about Fox new, rush Limbaugh, Sarah Palin etc. YOU CALL that acting an adult?. You lib/Dems can just sit back now, nobody is going to BOW TO YOUR DEMANDS. get used to being in the MINORITY. that's what you all are

Stephanie is representative of the crazy New Right; she is too limited to ever get it. Sadly, she's not alone.





Says the moron who claims the Repub wave is not important or meaningful.
 
IF you can, please explain this "rich people" obsession you have and feel that only Republicans are the "RICH" ??

i know you are some kind of high-functioning retard, so I'll try to make this simple for you.

It's not who is rich. It's who is putting the interests of the rich ahead of working people.

Unions smashing, right to work, cutting welfare to give tax breaks, free trade... that's the GOP schtick.

Frankly, I don't care if George Soros is rich, if he isn't fucking with me.
 
ACA won't survive..and I doubt he'll pull this amnesty he keeps threatening..his own party is going to chill him out on that one...america doesn't want open borders or
for illegals to bypass the legal immigration system that has been in place and worked for over 200 years.

They are already talking about how to 'make the ACA Better". Not repeal it. Not scrap it. "Make it better".

Polls show that both parties want immigration reform.
 
IF you can, please explain this "rich people" obsession you have and feel that only Republicans are the "RICH" ??

i know you are some kind of high-functioning retard, so I'll try to make this simple for you.

It's not who is rich. It's who is putting the interests of the rich ahead of working people.

Unions smashing, right to work, cutting welfare to give tax breaks, free trade... that's the GOP schtick.

Frankly, I don't care if George Soros is rich, if he isn't fucking with me.
So what do we get, those damn Backwater states voted out the Democrat party and Obama is still going to act like a thug dictator

No, he's going to act Like a President, just like Bush and Reagan and Ike and Clinton did.

He has never acted like a President Joe, he acts like a spoiled little child.

Much like yourself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top