SassyIrishLass
Diamond Member
- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,974
- 73,364
- 3,605
It's been going on for centuries. It's not going to stop anytime soon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think showing solidarity against the agenda of a nameless Aussie arsehole and those fuckwits on 4 and 8 chan is a good thing. If I was female I'd join them in wearing a scarf.You think hijab is a NZ thing.
That doesn’t show that at all. It proves they’ve conned you to accept violence to women! Good for you. I respect women and denounce Muslims oppression of women. I stand with womenI think showing solidarity against the agenda of a nameless Aussie arsehole and those fuckwits on 4 and 8 chan is a good thing. If I was female I'd join them in wearing a scarf.You think hijab is a NZ thing.
Well. It would be horribly immature of me to say that Mac doesn’t actually care for the nation’s well being. So, I won’t say it.
Christchurch with Muslims in it , a group that doesn’t believe in Christ. I laugh
I denounce radical Islam! Why can’t our politicians?There are no gods/lords'.Christchurch with Muslims in it , a group that doesn’t believe in Christ. I laugh
Just people who believe in fake shit made up by man, killing each other for thousands and thousands of years.
How sick is that?
You do know the christian lord' has killed more peoples on this planet than all otherI denounce radical Islam! Why can’t our politicians?There are no gods/lords'.Christchurch with Muslims in it , a group that doesn’t believe in Christ. I laugh
Just people who believe in fake shit made up by man, killing each other for thousands and thousands of years.
How sick is that?
They havent been hidden, i hear about on NPR as well as the thousands of Muslims getting killed by Isis because they are the wrong brand of Islam or refuse to accept extremist thuggery. Yemen and Somalia are failing states in civil war and crisis including famine and drought. They really are not comparable to a country like NZ with a functioning democratic form of government, strong rights and freedoms and where a civilized western person is not supposed to shoot up mosques and murder innocent people..There was a call for new gun laws.Did you say tbe same thing about "whining" Jews after the shooting at the Pittsburgh Synagogue? I suspect a lot Jews felt it personaly. Being a minority and targeted by violence and expresdong it when your community is attacked is hardly whining. Not when people are getting killed.Being able to see both sides doesn't mean you can't have an opinion.I quote Maajid Nawaz regularly here. He is the liberal Muslim Brit who coined the term "Regressive Left", horrified by the way many on the Left make a bad situation worse by coddling the worst elements of Islam in the West. Mr. Nawaz can see both sides of this issue. I know being able to see both sides of an issue is not considered a good thing here.
He risks his life every day, pushing for reform of his beloved religion. He was assaulted, again, just the other day (I suspect he'll be attacked here, too - that's how they operate). Here's his take on the predictable madness that has followed the New Zealand attack.
The New Zealand Mosque Massacre Blame Game Is Out of Control
LONDON—The anti-Muslim terrorist attack at two mosques in New Zealand marked perhaps the lowest point for Muslim communities in the West since the Bosnia genocide. It has left no doubt that far-right extremism is on the march once more.
But the sheer human tragedy of this attack against my Muslim communities has not deterred extremists from those other two ends of our political spectrum, the far left and the theocratic Islamists, from seeking to exploit it for their own nefarious purposes.
So it is with no surprise that I noticed, a mere day after 50 of my fellow Muslims were so publicly and tragically killed, while the blood was still wet and the bodies remained unburied, that the ideologues had circled like vultures. Opportunistic Islamist and far-left extremists began calling for a purge of people whose politics they disagree with, and started publishing McCarthyite lists of personae non grata to target. Few have come under fiercer assault than my friend and collaborator in dialogue, Sam Harris. The following spectacle has been incredibly unedifying.
Of course, inflammatory anti-Muslim language must be condemned by us all, and many anti-Muslim provocateurs should take a hard look at themselves after New Zealand, just as we must condemn inflammatory Islamist and far-left language. That is different, though, from trying to silence an entire policy concern like Western foreign policy or opposing immigration and critiquing Islam respectively. Only the extremists wish to shut down debate. And so it is crucial that we do not respond to far-right extremism in such a way that we inadvertently empower extremists from other ends of the political spectrum. Terrorists prefer the bullet to the ballot. Let us not become pawns in their game.
.
I don't like seeing anyone attacking innocent Muslims....but I also cannot handle the whining Muslims who feel they were personally attacked when they live 8000 miles away from the attack, and try to use this typically Islamic martyrdom complex to claim the right to attack others.
But i think these folks are being dishonest. They know Christians have been murdered in Iraq by the hundreds since Obama pulled us out of Iraq. Then there's the ethnic cleansing going on in Yemen and the Sudan for over a decade. All has been hidden by the MSM.
Apparently, 350 people in New Zealand converted to Islam the day after the shooting.
I'm guessing this wasn't the reaction the shooter was intending.
Christchurch with Muslims in it , a group that doesn’t believe in Christ. I laugh
white supremacy is classified as rightwing.My definition of a white nationalist is one who believes their nation should maintain a white identity and whose loyalty is to their state and to protecting it from non-white races.
Eh? You don't see that as racist?
Oh...
Where did I indicate that I don't see it as racist?
By the way, are you going to answer my question as to why you believe that the shooter is "right wing"?
The MSM ignores it. If they gave it the coverage it deserves, and wanted to give the amount of coverage they gave a single shooting in New Zealand, they wouldn't have the time to cover anything else.They havent been hidden, i hear about on NPR as well as the thousands of Muslims getting killed by Isis because they are the wrong brand of Islam or refuse to accept extremist thuggery. Yemen and Somalia are failing states in civil war and crisis including famine and drought. They really are not comparable to a country like NZ with a functioning democratic form of government, strong rights and freedoms and where a civilized western person is not supposed to shoot up mosques and murder innocent people..There was a call for new gun laws.Did you say tbe same thing about "whining" Jews after the shooting at the Pittsburgh Synagogue? I suspect a lot Jews felt it personaly. Being a minority and targeted by violence and expresdong it when your community is attacked is hardly whining. Not when people are getting killed.Being able to see both sides doesn't mean you can't have an opinion.I quote Maajid Nawaz regularly here. He is the liberal Muslim Brit who coined the term "Regressive Left", horrified by the way many on the Left make a bad situation worse by coddling the worst elements of Islam in the West. Mr. Nawaz can see both sides of this issue. I know being able to see both sides of an issue is not considered a good thing here.
He risks his life every day, pushing for reform of his beloved religion. He was assaulted, again, just the other day (I suspect he'll be attacked here, too - that's how they operate). Here's his take on the predictable madness that has followed the New Zealand attack.
The New Zealand Mosque Massacre Blame Game Is Out of Control
LONDON—The anti-Muslim terrorist attack at two mosques in New Zealand marked perhaps the lowest point for Muslim communities in the West since the Bosnia genocide. It has left no doubt that far-right extremism is on the march once more.
But the sheer human tragedy of this attack against my Muslim communities has not deterred extremists from those other two ends of our political spectrum, the far left and the theocratic Islamists, from seeking to exploit it for their own nefarious purposes.
So it is with no surprise that I noticed, a mere day after 50 of my fellow Muslims were so publicly and tragically killed, while the blood was still wet and the bodies remained unburied, that the ideologues had circled like vultures. Opportunistic Islamist and far-left extremists began calling for a purge of people whose politics they disagree with, and started publishing McCarthyite lists of personae non grata to target. Few have come under fiercer assault than my friend and collaborator in dialogue, Sam Harris. The following spectacle has been incredibly unedifying.
Of course, inflammatory anti-Muslim language must be condemned by us all, and many anti-Muslim provocateurs should take a hard look at themselves after New Zealand, just as we must condemn inflammatory Islamist and far-left language. That is different, though, from trying to silence an entire policy concern like Western foreign policy or opposing immigration and critiquing Islam respectively. Only the extremists wish to shut down debate. And so it is crucial that we do not respond to far-right extremism in such a way that we inadvertently empower extremists from other ends of the political spectrum. Terrorists prefer the bullet to the ballot. Let us not become pawns in their game.
.
I don't like seeing anyone attacking innocent Muslims....but I also cannot handle the whining Muslims who feel they were personally attacked when they live 8000 miles away from the attack, and try to use this typically Islamic martyrdom complex to claim the right to attack others.
But i think these folks are being dishonest. They know Christians have been murdered in Iraq by the hundreds since Obama pulled us out of Iraq. Then there's the ethnic cleansing going on in Yemen and the Sudan for over a decade. All has been hidden by the MSM.
Because they are trying to white wash white supremacy by calling it nationalism. Kind of like antisemites use the term anti-Zionism to white wash their anti Jewish ideology.that's why they have two different names. too funny.There is no difference.Renaming white supremecist into nationalism.you're damning white americans.
What were my exact words that "damned" white Americans?
are to, two, too the same?
So Arab Nationalists are in fact White Nationalists? Or are They White Supremacist?There is no difference.Renaming white supremecist into nationalism.you're damning white americans.
What were my exact words that "damned" white Americans?
white supremacy is classified as rightwing.My definition of a white nationalist is one who believes their nation should maintain a white identity and whose loyalty is to their state and to protecting it from non-white races.
Eh? You don't see that as racist?
Oh...
Where did I indicate that I don't see it as racist?
By the way, are you going to answer my question as to why you believe that the shooter is "right wing"?
Arab is an ethnic group and when history referrrd to Pan Arab Nationalism and Jewish Nationalism at the time of the Mandate it was about nation building and freedom from external rule. White is a broad category encompassing many ethnicities and diverse cultures who are dominant in their states. White nationslism is thinly cloaked white supremacy and it is not about building a nation but cleaning out those you dont like. I havent heard the term Arab nationalism used outside the split up of the mandate so it is not a good comparison. That is not to say certain Arab countries arent conducting ethnic cleansing campaigns of their own but they arent calling it nationalism.So Arab Nationalists are in fact White Nationalists? Or are They White Supremacist.There is no difference.Renaming white supremecist into nationalism.you're damning white americans.
What were my exact words that "damned" white Americans?
It's obvious you are a liar, and not a good one.
A Nationalist itself has nothing to do with Race, and in America which is the most diverse country on the planet, Nationalism refers to America as a Nation and not any particular group of people.
So Arab Nationalists are in fact White Nationalists? Or are They White Supremacist?There is no difference.Renaming white supremecist into nationalism.you're damning white americans.
What were my exact words that "damned" white Americans?
It's obvious you are a liar, and not a good one.
A Nationalist itself has nothing to do with Race, and in America which is the most diverse country on the planet, Nationalism refers to America as a Sovereign Nation under a Constitutional Republic, and not any particular group of people.
Propagandists who seek to transform the West into Islamist theocracies like to add the word "white" to the word "nationalist" in order to infuse the notion of national sovereignty with something nefarious.So Arab Nationalists are in fact White Nationalists? Or are They White Supremacist?There is no difference.Renaming white supremecist into nationalism.you're damning white americans.
What were my exact words that "damned" white Americans?
It's obvious you are a liar, and not a good one.
A Nationalist itself has nothing to do with Race, and in America which is the most diverse country on the planet, Nationalism refers to America as a Sovereign Nation under a Constitutional Republic, and not any particular group of people.