basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,042
- Thread starter
- #61
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He didn’t, of course. But even if He had, your faux question is clearly not just a non-sequitur but also a deflection.was Jesus "the world's policeman" because he spread Christianity around the world?
yes! why? read everything i said on the thread...it's not like i didn't state my case and give specificsHe didn’t, of course. But even if He had, your faux question is clearly not just a non-sequitur but also a deflection.
Is it your contention that America is (or ought to be) the World’s Policeman? If so, why?
my son actually inspired me to make this thread. he's a bibliophile at just 12 years old and keeps reading unusually grim books about ethnic slaughter. he recently read Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sinkiewicz's "Quo Vadis?" which recounts Roman emperor Nero's massacres of Christian converts. although my son says he's atheist, all his friends are Christian. He was horrified that Nero could feed Christians to the lions in front of a cheering crowd and asked me how such a thing was possible. that led to my interest in the topic. upon doing my research, I happened upon Samantha Power's work where she says America should intervene to prevent genocide, so i made this thread basically to make the case...happy now?He didn’t, of course. But even if He had, your faux question is clearly not just a non-sequitur but also a deflection.
Is it your contention that America is (or ought to be) the World’s Policeman? If so, why?
if women, children, and old people were being murdered 100 miles from where you live, wouldn't you run to help? then why do you stop this decision of your heart when the distance is 3,000 miles instead of 100?He didn’t, of course. But even if He had, your faux question is clearly not just a non-sequitur but also a deflection.
Is it your contention that America is (or ought to be) the World’s Policeman? If so, why?
Ok. So now that you admit that you were talking about Americans (making your concern about them not being a “race” an obviously retarded deflection effort), we can get to the second part of my question.yes! why? read everything i said on the thread...it's not like i didn't state my case and give specifics
it will actually be a shame to go on living happily, to be proud to belong to the human race, if steps are not taken to halt one more chapter in the greatest crime in history: genocide. NO MORE!Ok. So now that you admit that you were talking about Americans (making your concern about them not being a “race” an obviously retarded deflection effort), we can get to the second part of my question.
On what basis should the Americans assume the responsibility for being the policeman of the world (with or without the help of other nations)?
No. I don’t care what Samantha suggests.my son actually inspired me to make this thread. he's a bibliophile at just 12 years old and keeps reading unusually grim books about ethnic slaughter. he recently read Nobel Prize winner Henryk Sinkiewicz's "Quo Vadis?" which recounts Roman emperor Nero's massacres of Christian converts. although my son says he's atheist, all his friends are Christian. He was horrified that Nero could feed Christians to the lions in front of a cheering crowd and asked me how such a thing was possible. that led to my interest in the topic. upon doing my research, I happened upon Samantha Power's work where she says America should intervene to prevent genocide, so i made this thread basically to make the case...happy now?
Communist China is savagely oppressing and killing their Muslim population. Should we march in?it will actually be a shame to go on living happily, to be proud to belong to the human race, if steps are not taken to halt one more chapter in the greatest crime in history: genocide. NO MORE!
you don't want to intervene to help humanity. you don't drink. you don't smoke. WHAT DO YOU DO? damn goody two shoes!No. I don’t care what Samantha suggests.
I want your analysis.
We agree that some genocidal maniac trying to wipe out a people is horrific. But who gives the badge to America? Are you actually suggesting that international law should be suspended in any case where one nation is slaughtering the people of some other nation or ethnic group? We somehow have a right to invade some foreign land because our humanitarian instincts trump sovereign borders and international law?
And we have some obligation to have our people shed their blood and lose their lives when we have no particular national interest in the “genocide” in some other land beyond the humanitarian instinct?
yes. i'll get to that. i'm going chronologicallyCommunist China is savagely oppressing and killing their Muslim population. Should we march in?
Also, your copy and pastes are pretty much unreadable. You realize that nobody is bothering to try to read them, don’t you?
Nice deflection effort. A fail, as per your usual effort. But a valiant try.you don't want to intervene to help humanity. you don't drink. you don't smoke. WHAT DO YOU DO? damn goody two shoes!