No. Psalms 2 is not Hezekiah. Isaiah 9 is.
Of course. We have been discussing Isaiah.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Psalms 2 is not Hezekiah. Isaiah 9 is.
yes, but that specific question was about Psalms 2:7 so I was just answering that local question.Of course. We have been discussing Isaiah.
No where does God say he begot a son.
Wrong. David was begotten by Jesse. Jesse was not God.And yet God used that wording (begotten) in reference to David. Would you rather explain that God used that word in reference to Harry Potter, or some other character absent from the book of Psalms?
yes, but that specific question was about Psalms 2:7 so I was just answering that local question.
This is true. God doesn't have human children. It almost seems that the text can't be taken literally.Wrong. David was begotten by Jesse. Jesse was not God.
IIRC the Nation of Israel is also called God's children and Solomon is called God’s son also.Chapter 34 - YOU ARE MY SON
Psalms 2:7 The concept of physical sonship with God the Father is not found in biblical theology or in first century Judaism.jewsforjudaism.org
Yes, David is called God's son. Hosea calls Israel God's son.
God wouldn't have to tell Jesus.
I have to say, it’s surprising how some folks here make up stuff in order to discredit Jesus being the Messiah.
Some claim that the title “Son of Man”, which Jesus preferred to use himself, does not refer to being divine. That the prophecies foretold in books such as Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel, etc were only referring to a normal human that would be a king.
Yet in the New Testament, at the trial of Jesus, the High Priests asked him:
"I put You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!" Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." Then the high priest tore his clothes, saying, "He has spoken blasphemy! What further need do we have of witnesses? Look, now you have heard His blasphemy! What do you think?" They answered and said, "He is deserving of death."
Now here the priest asks if he is “the Christ”, which is the Messiah, and adds “the Son of God”.
If the Messiah/Christ was to be a “regular human being” and not divine, why would the priest ask this?
Then when Jesus says he is, and they will see “the Son of Man” sitting at the right hand of the Power, coming on the clouds of heaven, the priest loses his shit and tears his own clothes off and cries blasphemy. Jesus was referencing Daniel, which some folks here claim was not a real prophet. But if that was true then why did the high priest scream blasphemy about its reference then? If Daniel was just some “story” based off some ancient poem, why would the high priest lose his mind and demand Jesus be put to death?
Daniel ch7:
13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man,[a] comingwith the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
I know reading New Testament is like burning your own eyeballs out for certain people, but can these Christ-deniers explain this paradox?
IIRC the Nation of Israel is also called God's children and Solomon is called God’s son also.
Pretty dumb assumption, eh? The Messiah is just going to lead an army to kill everyone?The Messiah expected by the Jews was an anointed warrior king who would vanquish the enemies of the Jews..... like king David.
Pretty dumb assumption, eh? The Messiah is just going to lead an army to kill everyone?
The book of Rev I think 1:14 says he was like unto son of man, the word like unto means he was liken to, but not son of man. Christians try to be like unto Christ, does not make them Christ.I have to say, it’s surprising how some folks here make up stuff in order to discredit Jesus being the Messiah.
Some claim that the title “Son of Man”, which Jesus preferred to use himself, does not refer to being divine. That the prophecies foretold in books such as Daniel, Isaiah, Ezekiel, etc were only referring to a normal human that would be a king.
Yet in the New Testament, at the trial of Jesus, the High Priests asked him:
"I put You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!" Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." Then the high priest tore his clothes, saying, "He has spoken blasphemy! What further need do we have of witnesses? Look, now you have heard His blasphemy! What do you think?" They answered and said, "He is deserving of death."
Now here the priest asks if he is “the Christ”, which is the Messiah, and adds “the Son of God”.
If the Messiah/Christ was to be a “regular human being” and not divine, why would the priest ask this?
Then when Jesus says he is, and they will see “the Son of Man” sitting at the right hand of the Power, coming on the clouds of heaven, the priest loses his shit and tears his own clothes off and cries blasphemy. Jesus was referencing Daniel, which some folks here claim was not a real prophet. But if that was true then why did the high priest scream blasphemy about its reference then? If Daniel was just some “story” based off some ancient poem, why would the high priest lose his mind and demand Jesus be put to death?
Daniel ch7:
13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man,[a] comingwith the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.14 He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
I know reading New Testament is like burning your own eyeballs out for certain people, but can these Christ-deniers explain this paradox?
Absolutely falsehe must return to life in order to bring peace to the world. Jesus sect believed in reincarnation
And?
Son of Man refers to human form. The description of Rev 1:13 is of the High Priest and King(See Ex 28:4), which is the Messiah. He is like a human, but yet more than just a human.The book of Rev I think 1:14 says he was like unto son of man, the word like unto means he was liken to, but not son of man. Christians try to be like unto Christ, does not make them Christ.
In the Biblical age "son of" meant "reflection of."Son of Man refers to human form. The description of Rev 1:13 is of the High Priest and King(See Ex 28:4), which is the Messiah. He is like a human, but yet more than just a human.
What does that have to do with anything? He is an angel, but never does God say his name is in him. He does not have the power to forgive sins.Fact: Top Messenger Michael was always known as the Messenger of truth (spiritual Light)-Dan 10:21
Remember it's Michael who is known to be THE ONE Overturning the messenger of darkness (lies and ignorance).
And The clearest undeniable description of the Messiah Michael's Kingdom is in the same War Scroll (4Q471)
Where in verse XVII, it says, God will send eternal bliss by the might of
the Princely Angel of the Kingdom of Michael. He will enlighten with joy the children of Israel.
1QM v, 1-2) States:He (Michael)will not have much room to act as Royal Messiah while battling the Sons of Darkness.
“God himself is a supreme agent of salvation and after him in importance is Michael.”
So it doesn't sound like Jesus does it?
Jesus (the imposter) was the lie, it cost us thousands of wars and over 50 million slain over said lie
And?