A Religious Worldview.....'Childish'

[Hollie]

1. Actually....it's a question. 'Whose worldview is defined, characterized, by naive and impossible terms?'
Whose?



Now, I don't see any religious posters demanding that every person bend their knee to God, or attacking those who don't. But, daily, the bitter-haters go out of their way to denigrate believers, as believing in an 'invisible pixie in the sky," or as 'Bible-thumpers,' or using the pejorative 'Gawd.'

And here is the salient point: the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them.




2. Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”



a. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.


b. 'There is no God':
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism."

If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses. When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor.
The Schwarz Report Essays

c. “Marxism reduced man to his animal wants and material needs….Marxism was a downward step from the human to the animal- a descent from civilization into barbarism, which is to say, from the worship of God to the worship of material things.”
Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 79.




The importance of religion, here, is that it give the value to human life, beginning in the idea of man created in God's image, and, therefore, each man's life is sacred.....as opposed to the materialism of communism, which shares no such concept.
Compare that view with this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Calling such a view 'childish' would be far too kind.

So, what do you call conservatives who are also atheists?

Another failed thread from the OP.

I've always wondered how morons like you can offer a vapid, boring, tedious non-post, and feel satisfied.

You never bring anything to the table....and amble away muttering 'duh...yup. a..yup....'

Is it because you know you're working up to your ability?



Certainly commensurate with your job, as greeter at Wal-Mart.

Says Queen Cut N Paste of Crapola.

So you really have no answer, eh?

You rushed to this thread wanting so very badly to post a well thought out dispositive post.....
....and, instead....
Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting.
Daniel 5:27

Thou shall drink'eth the Kool Aid to cease'eth with these pointless threads.
Daniel 5:27a

 

[PoliticalChic]

So, what do you call conservatives who are also atheists?

Another failed thread from the OP.

I've always wondered how morons like you can offer a vapid, boring, tedious non-post, and feel satisfied.

You never bring anything to the table....and amble away muttering 'duh...yup. a..yup....'

Is it because you know you're working up to your ability?



Certainly commensurate with your job, as greeter at Wal-Mart.

All you bring is the same old stale bread....

Well....as it appears that you are the moth to my flame....
...stale bread must be a delicacy where you come from.


I used to save it for the pigeons....but now you can grovel ...I mean nibble at it.

You can blame it on retirement...

 

[Hollie]

Materialism is Marxism, better tell that to the capitalist as that is how they make their coveted money..

"Historical materialism is a methodological approach to the study of human societies and their development over time first articulated by Karl Marx (1818–1883) as the materialist conception of history. It is principally a theory of history according to which the material conditions of a society's mode of production (its way of producing and reproducing the means of human existence - in Marxist terms, the union of its productive capacity and social relations of production) fundamentally determine its organisation and development."
Historical materialism - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Copy and Paste: Students Abuse Internet Info
POSTED IN SCHOOL LAW BY LAWYERS.COMSM
Copy and Paste Students Abuse Internet Info

One DePaul University student may have thought copying paragraphs from an internet source into a research assignment presented no problems. There was just one: The lifted portion appeared in an obvious purple text, without proper recognition of the source. His response, when confronted, was not contrite, but: “So, how do I get rid of the purple?”

 

[Carla_Danger]

1. Actually....it's a question. 'Whose worldview is defined, characterized, by naive and impossible terms?'
Whose?



Now, I don't see any religious posters demanding that every person bend their knee to God, or attacking those who don't. But, daily, the bitter-haters go out of their way to denigrate believers, as believing in an 'invisible pixie in the sky," or as 'Bible-thumpers,' or using the pejorative 'Gawd.'

And here is the salient point: the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them.




2. Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”



a. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.


b. 'There is no God':
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism."

If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses. When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor.
The Schwarz Report Essays

c. “Marxism reduced man to his animal wants and material needs….Marxism was a downward step from the human to the animal- a descent from civilization into barbarism, which is to say, from the worship of God to the worship of material things.”
Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 79.




The importance of religion, here, is that it give the value to human life, beginning in the idea of man created in God's image, and, therefore, each man's life is sacred.....as opposed to the materialism of communism, which shares no such concept.
Compare that view with this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Calling such a view 'childish' would be far too kind.

So, what do you call conservatives who are also atheists?

So....you are forced to agree with my posts?

Excellent.

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Actually....it's a question. 'Whose worldview is defined, characterized, by naive and impossible terms?'
Whose?



Now, I don't see any religious posters demanding that every person bend their knee to God, or attacking those who don't. But, daily, the bitter-haters go out of their way to denigrate believers, as believing in an 'invisible pixie in the sky," or as 'Bible-thumpers,' or using the pejorative 'Gawd.'

And here is the salient point: the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them.




2. Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”



a. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.


b. 'There is no God':
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism."

If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses. When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor.
The Schwarz Report Essays

c. “Marxism reduced man to his animal wants and material needs….Marxism was a downward step from the human to the animal- a descent from civilization into barbarism, which is to say, from the worship of God to the worship of material things.”
Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 79.




The importance of religion, here, is that it give the value to human life, beginning in the idea of man created in God's image, and, therefore, each man's life is sacred.....as opposed to the materialism of communism, which shares no such concept.
Compare that view with this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Calling such a view 'childish' would be far too kind.

So, what do you call conservatives who are also atheists?

So....you are forced to agree with my posts?

Excellent.

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now....to underscore the childishness of Leftism....the absurdity of the Left.

They set public policy based on Freud's description of dreams: simple wish fulfillment.

Children do that.




" A map of the world that does not contain Utopia is not worth even glancing at "
Oscar Wilde, The Soul of Man under Socialism, 1889.




8. "In its modern beginnings, socialism was optimistic and well intentioned, without the overlay of its contemporary varieties that tend to bemoan prosperity, romanticize poverty, and promote a view that place individual rights are a secondary concern. This is to say that the earliest socialists sought the fullest possible flourishing of humanity, “the common good.”


A half-century before Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto, there was Gracchus Babeuf’s Plebeian Manifesto, which was later renamed the Manifesto of the Equals. Babeuf’s early (1796) work has been described as socialist, anarchist, and communist,....


“Under socialism…there will be no people living in fetid dens and fetid rags, and bringing up unhealthy, hunger pinched children in the midst of impossible and absolutely repulsive surroundings…Each member of society will share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”
Oscar Wilde"
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006




And sure enough...our pal Drop-Draws still awaits his "share in the general prosperity and happiness of the society…”

Stale bread is good enough for the peasants!

 

[Carla_Danger]

So, what do you call conservatives who are also atheists?

So....you are forced to agree with my posts?

Excellent.

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

I've told you before that I don't read your boring cut n paste jobs. Actually, your postings are very, very, repetitive. lol

Here are a couple of examples...

From your thread titled The Views You've been Trained To Accept

But, in some ways, the Left has grasped and used truths that explain why their star is in the ascendancy.

a. Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy.

From your thread titled Why We're Where We Are

2. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
Dennis Prager.

Basically, your cut n paste jobs are all the same.

 

[Moonglow]

So....you are forced to agree with my posts?

Excellent.

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

I've told you before that I don't read your boring cut n paste jobs. Actually, your postings are very, very, repetitive. lol

Here are a couple of examples...

From your thread titled The Views You've been Trained To Accept

But, in some ways, the Left has grasped and used truths that explain why their star is in the ascendancy.

a. Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy.

From your thread titled Why We're Where We Are

2. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
Dennis Prager.

Basically, your cut n paste jobs are all the same.

When you are getting paid to post, it matters not the sectional redundancy over lapses..

 

[PoliticalChic]

So....you are forced to agree with my posts?

Excellent.

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

I've told you before that I don't read your boring cut n paste jobs. Actually, your postings are very, very, repetitive. lol

Here are a couple of examples...

From your thread titled The Views You've been Trained To Accept

But, in some ways, the Left has grasped and used truths that explain why their star is in the ascendancy.

a. Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy.

From your thread titled Why We're Where We Are

2. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
Dennis Prager.

Basically, your cut n paste jobs are all the same.

Astounding how you "don't read them," but can give examples from them.


For purposes of clarity,and so that I may address you correctly.....are you this stupid, or simply a straight-faced liar?
Actually, you support one of my suspicions.....I always believed that there is a certain affinity between stupid people and lying....perhaps a necessity in that precinct.



You do read them....and strive mightily to find some flaw....unsuccessfully.

Case in point.....the bogus 'cut and paste' thing, which you intend as a pejorative: it refers to method of presentation, not refutation of the facts provided.

When you have no way to cogently disagree.....scream 'cut and paste!!!!'


And you do.

 

[Carla_Danger]

Not hardly, dingbat. You seem to assume all atheists are liberal, which of course isn't true.

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

I've told you before that I don't read your boring cut n paste jobs. Actually, your postings are very, very, repetitive. lol

Here are a couple of examples...

From your thread titled The Views You've been Trained To Accept

But, in some ways, the Left has grasped and used truths that explain why their star is in the ascendancy.

a. Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy.

From your thread titled Why We're Where We Are

2. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
Dennis Prager.

Basically, your cut n paste jobs are all the same.

Astounding how you "don't read them," but can give examples from them.


For purposes of clarity,and so that I may address you correctly.....are you this stupid, or simply a straight-faced liar?
Actually, you support one of my suspicions.....I always believed that there is a certain affinity between stupid people and lying....perhaps a necessity in that precinct.



You do read them....and strive mightily to find some flaw....unsuccessfully.

Case in point.....the bogus 'cut and paste' thing, which you intend as a pejorative: it refers to method of presentation, not refutation of the facts provided.

When you have no way to cogently disagree.....scream 'cut and paste!!!!'


And you do.

You seem to be suffering from delusions of grandeur. It's not that hard to find a duplicate cut n paste by you, really it isn't.

All you have to do is point your mouse to one of your threads. Any thread, it doesn't matter.

Like this one...

Liberalism's Greatest Success: The Colleges

It is easily provable that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats follow the dictates of Stalin's emissaries in the United States, the CPUSA (the Communist Party, USA)....

See, they all say the same damn thing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"You seem to assume all atheists are liberal,...."

You should learn to read with the same precision with which I post....

What I actually stated in the OP was this:
"....the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them."



I went further and defined Liberals as totalitarians as follows:

"Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”


Seems you are one of the less astute to whom things must be explained repeatedly.
If stupidity were an element on the Periodic Chart, the symbol would be your picture.

I guess your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read. I read that Leftism is a religion and lefties are Marxist, then completely tuned out. Just curious, do you do cut n paste by request? Your material is not only boring, but very repetitive.

Have you decided on a label for people who are conservative and also atheist? I believe we have 1 or 2 on this forum.

So, your latest excuse for ineptitude is that you didn't read the posts to which you responded.

And...to show how truly stupid you are, not only didn't you read it...."your long cut n paste jobs are just too boring to read"....
....you go on to decry same as "very repetitive."

Didn't read,....but it's repetitive.

That's as stupid as the old joke "the food was bad and the portions too small."

Small....as in your IQ.


And...a style point from one who simply wants to help.....something can be 'repetitive,' but "very repetitive" smacks of teenage hyperbole.

I've told you before that I don't read your boring cut n paste jobs. Actually, your postings are very, very, repetitive. lol

Here are a couple of examples...

From your thread titled The Views You've been Trained To Accept

But, in some ways, the Left has grasped and used truths that explain why their star is in the ascendancy.

a. Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy.

From your thread titled Why We're Where We Are

2. Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.
Dennis Prager.

Basically, your cut n paste jobs are all the same.

Astounding how you "don't read them," but can give examples from them.


For purposes of clarity,and so that I may address you correctly.....are you this stupid, or simply a straight-faced liar?
Actually, you support one of my suspicions.....I always believed that there is a certain affinity between stupid people and lying....perhaps a necessity in that precinct.



You do read them....and strive mightily to find some flaw....unsuccessfully.

Case in point.....the bogus 'cut and paste' thing, which you intend as a pejorative: it refers to method of presentation, not refutation of the facts provided.

When you have no way to cogently disagree.....scream 'cut and paste!!!!'


And you do.

You seem to be suffering from delusions of grandeur. It's not that hard to find a duplicate cut n paste by you, really it isn't.

All you have to do is point your mouse to one of your threads. Any thread, it doesn't matter.

Like this one...

Liberalism's Greatest Success: The Colleges

It is easily provable that Liberals/Progressives/Democrats follow the dictates of Stalin's emissaries in the United States, the CPUSA (the Communist Party, USA)....

See, they all say the same damn thing.

Case in point.....the bogus 'cut and paste' thing, which you intend as a pejorative: it refers to method of presentation, not refutation of the facts provided.

When you have no way to cogently disagree.....scream 'cut and paste!!!!'

 

[PoliticalChic]

9. The premise of the OP is to compare the religious view with the materialist....and while we cannot know the result of a religious life....there is ample proof for that of the socialist:


" Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!


Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



a. Need an example of this utopianism, and the Left’s willingness to destroy what is providentially good, in the hope of finding this imaginary utopia?

Michael Moore tells CNN's Anderson Cooper that capitalism “is an evil system set up to benefit the few at the expense of the many…. "So, what system do you want?" Anderson Cooper asked Moore. "Well there's no system right now that exists. We're going to create that system.” Michael Moore We re Going To Replace Capitalism As We Know It RealClearPolitics



Leftism: destroy what is good, and proven successful....in favor of some imaginary 'progress.'

Brings to mind the election of the current inhabitant of the White House, huh.

 

[Hollie]

9. The premise of the OP is to compare the religious view with the materialist....and while we cannot know the result of a religious life....there is ample proof for that of the socialist:


" Marxism rested on the assumption that the condition of the working classes would grow ever worse under capitalism, that there would be but two classes: one small and rich, the other vast and increasingly impoverished, and revolution would be the anodyne that would result in the “common good.” But by the early 20th century, it was clear that this assumption was completely wrong!


Under capitalism, the standard of living of all was improving: prices falling, incomes rising, health and sanitation improving, lengthening of life spans, diets becoming more varied, the new jobs created in industry paid more than most could make in agriculture, housing improved, and middle class industrialists and business owners displaced nobility and gentry as heroes."
From a speech by Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President, Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty.
Delivered at Hillsdale College, October 27, 2006



a. Need an example of this utopianism, and the Left’s willingness to destroy what is providentially good, in the hope of finding this imaginary utopia?

Michael Moore tells CNN's Anderson Cooper that capitalism “is an evil system set up to benefit the few at the expense of the many…. "So, what system do you want?" Anderson Cooper asked Moore. "Well there's no system right now that exists. We're going to create that system.” Michael Moore We re Going To Replace Capitalism As We Know It RealClearPolitics



Leftism: destroy what is good, and proven successful....in favor of some imaginary 'progress.'

Brings to mind the election of the current inhabitant of the White House, huh.

Hyper-religionism: hate, hate, hate. The hyper-religious hate themselves, they hate each other and they hate their miserable existence.

Brings to mind every thread of edited, parsed and out of context cut and paste "quotes" dumped into the forum by PoliticalQuack.

 

[PoliticalChic]

10. The religion of Leftism has, as its goal, Utopia here on Earth rather than in an afterlife…



And for the John Lennon-idolaters, it is a world without religion or a world governed by the amoral United Nations, where mass murderers sit on ‘human rights’ councils.
No possessions means no private property, and the state possesses everything…
....the individual is a serf, a vassal whose only rights are those granted to him by some world government.



BTW....the formulation of a 'united nations' was the behest of Joseph Stalin. Connect those dots.





11. The desire to find a perfect world goes back further than Marx or Stalin...

"There is an ancient literary tradition, going back at least to Plato’s Republic, of constructing imaginary ideal societies. Such attempts include Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis (1626), Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726), Samuel Butler’s Erewhon (1872), William Morris’s News From Nowhere (1890) and H G Wells’s Time Machine (1895).

The creators of these happy communities usually had some particular axe of their own to grind by way of a solution to society’s problems: for William Morris the answer was socialism, in Samuel Gott’s New Jerusalem (1648) it was education, and in Campanella’s City of the Sun (1623) it was eugenics.



....by far the most famous example of the genre is Thomas More’s Utopia, which has given its name to the concept of a perfect society where life is without care."
Robert Whelan, "Wild in Woods," p. 59-60




The origin of the word "Utopia" is the answer to the question of which worldview is naive, and childlike.....


"For thousands of years human beings have dreamt of perfect worlds, worlds free of conflict, hunger and unhappiness. But can these worlds ever exist in reality?

In 1516 Sir Thomas More wrote the first 'Utopia'. He coined the word 'utopia' from the Greek ou-topos meaning 'no place' or 'nowhere'. ... So at the very heart of the word is a vital question: can a perfect world ever be realised?" Utopia



"....'utopia' from the Greek ou-topos meaning 'no place' or 'nowhere'."
Never was.....never will be.




Yet the slaughterers of millions, those builders of castles in the sky scoff at religion, biblical guidance, and God.

And the easily led swear by it!

 

[Hollie]

10. The religion of Leftism has, as its goal, Utopia here on Earth rather than in an afterlife…



And for the John Lennon-idolaters, it is a world without religion or a world governed by the amoral United Nations, where mass murderers sit on ‘human rights’ councils.
No possessions means no private property, and the state possesses everything…
....the individual is a serf, a vassal whose only rights are those granted to him by some world government.



BTW....the formulation of a 'united nations' was the behest of Joseph Stalin. Connect those dots.





11. The desire to find a perfect world goes back further than Marx or Stalin...

"There is an ancient literary tradition, going back at least to Plato’s Republic, of constructing imaginary ideal societies. Such attempts include Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis (1626), Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726), Samuel Butler’s Erewhon (1872), William Morris’s News From Nowhere (1890) and H G Wells’s Time Machine (1895).

The creators of these happy communities usually had some particular axe of their own to grind by way of a solution to society’s problems: for William Morris the answer was socialism, in Samuel Gott’s New Jerusalem (1648) it was education, and in Campanella’s City of the Sun (1623) it was eugenics.



....by far the most famous example of the genre is Thomas More’s Utopia, which has given its name to the concept of a perfect society where life is without care."
Robert Whelan, "Wild in Woods," p. 59-60




The origin of the word "Utopia" is the answer to the question of which worldview is naive, and childlike.....


"For thousands of years human beings have dreamt of perfect worlds, worlds free of conflict, hunger and unhappiness. But can these worlds ever exist in reality?

In 1516 Sir Thomas More wrote the first 'Utopia'. He coined the word 'utopia' from the Greek ou-topos meaning 'no place' or 'nowhere'. ... So at the very heart of the word is a vital question: can a perfect world ever be realised?" Utopia



"....'utopia' from the Greek ou-topos meaning 'no place' or 'nowhere'."
Never was.....never will be.




Yet the slaughterers of millions, those builders of castles in the sky scoff at religion, biblical guidance, and God.

And the easily led swear by it!

Yet, the slaughter of millions was prompted by religion, biblical guidance and its polytheistic gawds.

And the easily persuaded "good xtians" swear by it.

 

[NoNukes]

1. Actually....it's a question. 'Whose worldview is defined, characterized, by naive and impossible terms?'
Whose?



Now, I don't see any religious posters demanding that every person bend their knee to God, or attacking those who don't. But, daily, the bitter-haters go out of their way to denigrate believers, as believing in an 'invisible pixie in the sky," or as 'Bible-thumpers,' or using the pejorative 'Gawd.'

And here is the salient point: the majority of the sneering cult seem not to recognize not just a childishness of their own beliefs...
....but the downright danger to humanity of them.




2. Most of those jeering are totalitarians, mostly of the Liberal persuasion.
Theirs, the opposite view to the religious one, is Leftism....a religion unto itself.
The 'Left' would include every totalitarian belief, every political doctrine that stems from materialism/Marxism, that finds 'economic inequality' more important than identifying good and evil.

'Every Leftist is, essentially, a Marxist…even though most eschew the title since the fall of the Soviet Union. Even so, Left-wing ideas are predicated on Marx’s materialist view. Philosophically, the term implies that only material things are real.'
Prager, chapter 1, “Still The Best Hope”



a. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.


b. 'There is no God':
This concept is an essential element of Marxism. As Lenin stated: "Atheism is a natural and inseparable portion of Marxism, of the theory and practice of Scientific Socialism."

If God exists and is in supreme command of the universe, He possesses discretionary power, and His actions cannot always be calculated accurately in advance. The whole edifice of Marxism collapses. When Marx and the Communists deny the existence of God, they simultaneously deny the authority of the Ten Commandments, the existence of absolute standards of right and wrong, of good and evil; and man is left on the playing fields of the universe without a referee, without a book of rules. The winning side in any conflict can decide on what rules of conduct to apply. Morality is the creation of the victor.
The Schwarz Report Essays

c. “Marxism reduced man to his animal wants and material needs….Marxism was a downward step from the human to the animal- a descent from civilization into barbarism, which is to say, from the worship of God to the worship of material things.”
Berman, “Terror and Liberalism,” p. 79.




The importance of religion, here, is that it give the value to human life, beginning in the idea of man created in God's image, and, therefore, each man's life is sacred.....as opposed to the materialism of communism, which shares no such concept.
Compare that view with this:

"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life." Leon Trotsky

Calling such a view 'childish' would be far too kind.

Look at all of the religious people on these boards who criticize aethiests.

It's interesting.....telling, in fact, what you chose to respond to.

You Liberals simply hate it when facts about you are revealed.



And you did serve as proof of this:

Now...what was I saying about some worldviews being.....deadly.
Some 112 million human beings....slaughtered by savages who aim to eradicate religion.
Yet, the facts are met by Liberals and Progressives with a shrug.

Good deflection. You did not even have to cut and paste. Or did you?

Deflection?

Is that the term your masters tell you to throw in when you're stumped?

My post, of course, noted that you produced a vapid attempt at avoiding the subject.
You did....but unsuccessfully....as is the case with most of your endeavors.

There are obviously no mirrors in Brooklyn. Pity.